{"title":"Quasi-Contract","authors":"B. Frier","doi":"10.1093/oso/9780197573211.003.0009","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The jurists recognized that there were some situations in which a contract-like set of duties and obligations arose from circumstances involving no agreement between the parties. The two most influential forms of such “quasi-contract” are unauthorized administration of affairs (negotiorum gestio) and what is now called unjustified enrichment (actionable through the condictio). Although this body of law remained somewhat underdeveloped, it contains many important insights into Roman concepts of obligation. Particularly for unjustified enrichment, the jurists clarified when a benefit conferred upon one person at another’s expense can be reclaimed on the basis that the recipient has no legitimate basis for retaining the benefit.","PeriodicalId":181337,"journal":{"name":"A Casebook on the Roman Law of Contracts","volume":"6 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-06-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"A Casebook on the Roman Law of Contracts","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780197573211.003.0009","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The jurists recognized that there were some situations in which a contract-like set of duties and obligations arose from circumstances involving no agreement between the parties. The two most influential forms of such “quasi-contract” are unauthorized administration of affairs (negotiorum gestio) and what is now called unjustified enrichment (actionable through the condictio). Although this body of law remained somewhat underdeveloped, it contains many important insights into Roman concepts of obligation. Particularly for unjustified enrichment, the jurists clarified when a benefit conferred upon one person at another’s expense can be reclaimed on the basis that the recipient has no legitimate basis for retaining the benefit.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
准合同
法学家认识到,在某些情况下,一套类似合同的责任和义务产生于当事人之间没有协议的情况。这类"准契约"的两种最具影响力的形式是未经授权的事务管理(协商处理)和现在所谓的不正当得利(可通过附带条件提起诉讼)。虽然这一法律体系仍然有些不发达,但它包含了许多关于罗马义务概念的重要见解。特别是对于不正当的得利,法学家澄清了在什么情况下,以牺牲他人的利益为代价授予某人的利益可以在接受者没有保留该利益的合法依据的基础上收回。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Introduction to Roman Contract Law Quasi-Contract Capacity to Contract Filling in the Gaps
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1