Abusiveness is Non-Binary: Five Shades of Gray in German Online News-Comments

Marco Niemann
{"title":"Abusiveness is Non-Binary: Five Shades of Gray in German Online News-Comments","authors":"Marco Niemann","doi":"10.1109/CBI.2019.00009","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Online news comment sections face a surge in uncivil, abusive and even straightforwardly hateful and threatening posts. In Germany especially the refugee crisis beginning in 2015 has sparked a lot of controversial and even unacceptable user comments. Overwhelmed by the amount of content and facing the risk of fines and a churn of readers as well as advertisers, many platforms shut down their comment sections as a last resort. To reduce their moderation effort, academics started applying machine learning to classify comments automatically. However, these efforts so far have been mostly focused on English texts. To provide similar systems for German, this paper implements and evaluates six different machine learning classifiers and five different strategies to convert textual comments into machine-compatible vectors. Contrary to common belief in the domain, comments often evade binary classification: Often comments are not only hateful, or insulting or threatening but fall within multiple of these categories. Hence, we will go beyond traditional multi-class classification models and prototypically evaluate the use of multi-label techniques. The first evaluations indicate that systems for abusive language detection are transferable to the German language and that supporting multi-labels might not only help to improve the detection of rare abusiveness types but also lead to a more realistic representation of actual online commentary.","PeriodicalId":193238,"journal":{"name":"2019 IEEE 21st Conference on Business Informatics (CBI)","volume":"6 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-07-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2019 IEEE 21st Conference on Business Informatics (CBI)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/CBI.2019.00009","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

Online news comment sections face a surge in uncivil, abusive and even straightforwardly hateful and threatening posts. In Germany especially the refugee crisis beginning in 2015 has sparked a lot of controversial and even unacceptable user comments. Overwhelmed by the amount of content and facing the risk of fines and a churn of readers as well as advertisers, many platforms shut down their comment sections as a last resort. To reduce their moderation effort, academics started applying machine learning to classify comments automatically. However, these efforts so far have been mostly focused on English texts. To provide similar systems for German, this paper implements and evaluates six different machine learning classifiers and five different strategies to convert textual comments into machine-compatible vectors. Contrary to common belief in the domain, comments often evade binary classification: Often comments are not only hateful, or insulting or threatening but fall within multiple of these categories. Hence, we will go beyond traditional multi-class classification models and prototypically evaluate the use of multi-label techniques. The first evaluations indicate that systems for abusive language detection are transferable to the German language and that supporting multi-labels might not only help to improve the detection of rare abusiveness types but also lead to a more realistic representation of actual online commentary.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
谩骂是非二元的:德国网络新闻评论的五种灰色阴影
网络新闻评论区出现了大量不文明、辱骂甚至直接充满仇恨和威胁的帖子。在德国,尤其是2015年开始的难民危机引发了许多有争议甚至不可接受的用户评论。由于内容太多,再加上面临罚款、流失读者和广告客户的风险,许多平台不得已关闭了评论区。为了减少审核工作量,学者们开始应用机器学习对评论进行自动分类。然而,到目前为止,这些努力主要集中在英语文本上。为了为德语提供类似的系统,本文实现并评估了六种不同的机器学习分类器和五种不同的策略,以将文本注释转换为机器兼容的向量。与该领域的普遍看法相反,评论经常逃避二元分类:通常评论不仅是仇恨的、侮辱的或威胁的,而且属于这些类别的多个类别。因此,我们将超越传统的多类别分类模型,并对多标签技术的使用进行原型评估。最初的评估表明,谩骂语言检测系统可以转移到德语中,支持多标签不仅有助于改进对罕见的谩骂类型的检测,而且还可以更真实地表示实际的在线评论。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Preconditions for the Use of a Checklist by Enterprise Architects to Improve the Quality of a Business Case A Framework for Industrial Symbiosis Systems for Agent-Based Simulation Conceptual Modeling Meets Customer Journey Mapping: Structuring a Tool for Service Innovation Are We Ready to Play in the Cloud? Developing new Quality Certifications to Tackle Challenges of Cloud Gaming Services Shadow IT and Business-Managed IT: Where Is the Theory?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1