The Imperialist Claws of Metacapitalism

G. Mickhail
{"title":"The Imperialist Claws of Metacapitalism","authors":"G. Mickhail","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.1017505","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The information and industrial revolutions are so different and yet similar. Both enjoyed the emergence of accounting measurement and management techniques which privileged the efficient allocation of resources as the principal imperative to a firm's participation in a free market economy. MetaCapitalism is one such corporate change strategy which promised untold wealth and unprecedented growth, and under that guise a predatory Darwinistic corporate strategy was implemented. Fundamentally, it promotes extreme outsourcing and downsizing of human capital, de-capitalisation of all non-core capital assets and the diminished role of the State in the global free market economy. Yet the most disturbing aspect is its complete and total disregard for even the slightest social or public policy implications. Essentially then, its most salient danger is an unmistakable endorsement of a fundamentalist brand of value free, reckless capitalism that is ultimately detrimental not only to the long-term business interest, but human as well. One of the main findings of evaluating the Fortune 100 companies' performance in implementing MetaCapitalism was the resulting monopolies. Lenin described monopolies as essential to imperialism which is the highest stage of capitalism. The parallels between the resulting monopolies under MetaCapitalism, and what Lenin described as the final stage of Capitalism are poignant. I would like to draw upon those parallels in the hope that earlier work might enlighten our understanding and inform our critique of MetaCapiatlism.","PeriodicalId":245549,"journal":{"name":"Business History eJournal","volume":"8 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2007-09-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Business History eJournal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1017505","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The information and industrial revolutions are so different and yet similar. Both enjoyed the emergence of accounting measurement and management techniques which privileged the efficient allocation of resources as the principal imperative to a firm's participation in a free market economy. MetaCapitalism is one such corporate change strategy which promised untold wealth and unprecedented growth, and under that guise a predatory Darwinistic corporate strategy was implemented. Fundamentally, it promotes extreme outsourcing and downsizing of human capital, de-capitalisation of all non-core capital assets and the diminished role of the State in the global free market economy. Yet the most disturbing aspect is its complete and total disregard for even the slightest social or public policy implications. Essentially then, its most salient danger is an unmistakable endorsement of a fundamentalist brand of value free, reckless capitalism that is ultimately detrimental not only to the long-term business interest, but human as well. One of the main findings of evaluating the Fortune 100 companies' performance in implementing MetaCapitalism was the resulting monopolies. Lenin described monopolies as essential to imperialism which is the highest stage of capitalism. The parallels between the resulting monopolies under MetaCapitalism, and what Lenin described as the final stage of Capitalism are poignant. I would like to draw upon those parallels in the hope that earlier work might enlighten our understanding and inform our critique of MetaCapiatlism.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
元资本主义的帝国主义之爪
信息革命和工业革命既不同又相似。两者都得益于会计计量和管理技术的出现,这些技术使资源的有效配置成为企业参与自由市场经济的主要必要条件。元资本主义就是这样一种企业变革战略,它承诺了数不清的财富和前所未有的增长,并在这种伪装下实施了掠夺性的达尔文主义企业战略。从根本上说,它促进了人力资本的极度外包和缩小,所有非核心资本资产的资本化,以及国家在全球自由市场经济中的作用的减弱。然而,最令人不安的方面是,它完全无视哪怕是最轻微的社会或公共政策影响。从本质上讲,它最突出的危险是,它毫无疑问地支持了一种原教旨主义的、无价值的、不计后果的资本主义,这种资本主义最终不仅会损害长期商业利益,也会损害人类的利益。在评估《财富》100强企业在实施元资本主义方面的表现时,一个主要发现是由此产生的垄断。列宁认为垄断是资本主义最高阶段帝国主义的必要条件。在元资本主义下产生的垄断与列宁所描述的资本主义的最后阶段之间的相似之处令人心酸。我想借鉴这些相似之处,希望早期的工作可以启发我们的理解,并为我们对元资本主义的批判提供信息。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Continuity and Change in Construction Procurement William Henry Cavendish-Bentinck-Scott, 4th Duke of Portland Emergence of Modern Impersonal Exchange: Role of Formalization in the Rise of Modern Capitalism Samuelson’s Neoclassical Synthesis Did Not Betray Keynes: Keynes Had Offered Just Such a Synthesis in the General Theory, As Well As to Hicks and Harrod in Correspondence, in 1936 Longitudinal Study of Seylan Bank, Sri Lanka from 1996 to 2008
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1