Exploratory Study on Latvian Secondary School Teachers’ Understanding of the Concept of Scientific Literacy

Agnese Davidsone, V. Silkane
{"title":"Exploratory Study on Latvian Secondary School Teachers’ Understanding of the Concept of Scientific Literacy","authors":"Agnese Davidsone, V. Silkane","doi":"10.22364/atee.2022.12","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Teachers’ scientific knowledge and understanding of science are prominent in determining how teaching scientific literacy will be integrated in the curriculum. However, in previous literature in-service teachers’ understanding of scientific literacy has not been studied sufficiently. This qualitative study aims to close this gap and explore how Latvian secondary school teachers (N = 23) understand the concept of scientific literacy. In our study, we distinguished three dimensions of scientific literacy: procedural, affective, and conceptual. Our results indicate that teachers associate scientific literacy mainly with the aspects related to procedural dimension: having knowledge about conducting a scientific study, applying scientific methods, and having an understanding about scientific concepts and processes. Teachers do not perceive themselves as highly scientifically literate for a variety of reasons. For the teachers interviewed, features of scientific literacy overlap with media and information literacy and critical thinking. We conclude that the teachers’ understanding only partly covers the depth and breadth of the concept of scientific literacy, and differs depending on teachers’ previous education and school subject thought. The importance of teachers’ (further) education in developing their understanding of the concept of scientific literacy is discussed.","PeriodicalId":286803,"journal":{"name":"To Be or Not to Be a Great Educator","volume":"93 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"To Be or Not to Be a Great Educator","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22364/atee.2022.12","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Teachers’ scientific knowledge and understanding of science are prominent in determining how teaching scientific literacy will be integrated in the curriculum. However, in previous literature in-service teachers’ understanding of scientific literacy has not been studied sufficiently. This qualitative study aims to close this gap and explore how Latvian secondary school teachers (N = 23) understand the concept of scientific literacy. In our study, we distinguished three dimensions of scientific literacy: procedural, affective, and conceptual. Our results indicate that teachers associate scientific literacy mainly with the aspects related to procedural dimension: having knowledge about conducting a scientific study, applying scientific methods, and having an understanding about scientific concepts and processes. Teachers do not perceive themselves as highly scientifically literate for a variety of reasons. For the teachers interviewed, features of scientific literacy overlap with media and information literacy and critical thinking. We conclude that the teachers’ understanding only partly covers the depth and breadth of the concept of scientific literacy, and differs depending on teachers’ previous education and school subject thought. The importance of teachers’ (further) education in developing their understanding of the concept of scientific literacy is discussed.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
拉脱维亚中学教师对科学素养概念理解的探索性研究
教师的科学知识和对科学的理解是决定如何将科学素养教学融入课程的重要因素。然而,在以往的文献中,对在职教师对科学素养的理解研究不够。本定性研究旨在缩小这一差距,并探讨拉脱维亚中学教师(N = 23)如何理解科学素养的概念。在我们的研究中,我们区分了科学素养的三个维度:程序、情感和概念。我们的研究结果表明,教师将科学素养主要与程序维度相关的方面联系起来:具有进行科学研究的知识,应用科学方法,以及对科学概念和过程的理解。由于种种原因,教师不认为自己具有高度的科学素养。受访教师的科学素养特征与媒介信息素养和批判性思维特征重叠。我们得出结论,教师对科学素养概念的理解仅部分涵盖了科学素养概念的深度和广度,并且根据教师以往的教育和学校的学科思想而有所不同。讨论了教师(继续)教育在培养他们对科学素养概念的理解中的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Indicators of Social Emotional Health (SEHS-T) and Resilience in the Latvian Teachers’ Sample Focusing on Arts Education from the Perspectives of Well-Being The Impact of Additional Sports Activities on the Development of Students in General Education Schools Integrating Computational Thinking into Classroom Practice: A Case Study Teacher Creator: Practices of Creating Educational Contexts
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1