Comparative analysis of efficacy and safety of Bilastine 20 mg and Levocetirizine 5 mg in the treatment of Allergic Rhinoconjunctivitis

D. sharma, Hemendra Bamaniya
{"title":"Comparative analysis of efficacy and safety of Bilastine 20 mg and Levocetirizine 5 mg in the treatment of Allergic Rhinoconjunctivitis","authors":"D. sharma, Hemendra Bamaniya","doi":"10.17511/JOOO.2020.I08.06","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: The present study was conducted to assess the efficacy and safety of bilastine 20 mgand compare the results with that of levocetirizine 5 mg in the treatment of allergicrhinoconjunctivitis. Material and Methods: It was a prospective study conducted in theDepartment of Ophthalmology and Department of Otorhinolaryngology at a tertiary institute ofsouthern Rajasthan, India during the period of 6 months from September 2019 to February 2020.100 patients of chronic allergic rhinoconjunctivitis were included in the study, of which 50 weretreated with Bilastine 20 mg, and the rest 50 patients were treated with levocetirizine 5 mg. Theprimary assessment was done by calculating the total symptom score (TSS) before and after the 7thand 14th post-treatment day. Results: The age of the patients ranges from 10 years to 65 yearswith a mean age of 32±5.2 years. The primary efficacy parameter for assessment was a reduction intotal symptom score (TSS). Both bilastine 20 mg and levocetirizine 5 mg significantly reduced theTSS on the 7th and 14th post-treatment days (p-value< 0.001). There was no significant differencebetween TSS of bilastine and levocetirizine after 7 days (p-value= 0.41) and after 14 days treatment(p-value= 0.68). Adverse events were reported by 10% of patients in the bilastine group and by38% of patients in the levocetirizine group. Conclusion: Bilastine is a selective H1 antihistaminewith good efficacy and excellent safety profile and it is highly recommended to use it as a first-linetreatment for allergic rhinoconjunctivitis.","PeriodicalId":112259,"journal":{"name":"Tropical Journal of Ophthalmology and Otolaryngology","volume":"15 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Tropical Journal of Ophthalmology and Otolaryngology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17511/JOOO.2020.I08.06","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: The present study was conducted to assess the efficacy and safety of bilastine 20 mgand compare the results with that of levocetirizine 5 mg in the treatment of allergicrhinoconjunctivitis. Material and Methods: It was a prospective study conducted in theDepartment of Ophthalmology and Department of Otorhinolaryngology at a tertiary institute ofsouthern Rajasthan, India during the period of 6 months from September 2019 to February 2020.100 patients of chronic allergic rhinoconjunctivitis were included in the study, of which 50 weretreated with Bilastine 20 mg, and the rest 50 patients were treated with levocetirizine 5 mg. Theprimary assessment was done by calculating the total symptom score (TSS) before and after the 7thand 14th post-treatment day. Results: The age of the patients ranges from 10 years to 65 yearswith a mean age of 32±5.2 years. The primary efficacy parameter for assessment was a reduction intotal symptom score (TSS). Both bilastine 20 mg and levocetirizine 5 mg significantly reduced theTSS on the 7th and 14th post-treatment days (p-value< 0.001). There was no significant differencebetween TSS of bilastine and levocetirizine after 7 days (p-value= 0.41) and after 14 days treatment(p-value= 0.68). Adverse events were reported by 10% of patients in the bilastine group and by38% of patients in the levocetirizine group. Conclusion: Bilastine is a selective H1 antihistaminewith good efficacy and excellent safety profile and it is highly recommended to use it as a first-linetreatment for allergic rhinoconjunctivitis.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Bilastine 20mg与左西替利嗪5mg治疗变应性鼻结膜炎的疗效及安全性比较分析
目的:评价bilastine 20mg与左西替利嗪5mg治疗变应性鼻结膜炎的疗效和安全性。材料与方法:前瞻性研究于2019年9月至2020年2月在印度拉贾斯坦邦南部某高等专科医院眼科和耳鼻喉科开展,研究时间为6个月,共纳入100例慢性变应性鼻结膜炎患者,其中50例患者采用Bilastine 20mg治疗,其余50例患者采用左西替利嗪5mg治疗。通过计算治疗后第7天和第14天前后的总症状评分(TSS)进行初步评估。结果:患者年龄10 ~ 65岁,平均年龄32±5.2岁。评估的主要疗效参数是总症状评分(TSS)的降低。bilastine 20mg和左西替利嗪5mg在治疗后第7天和第14天均显著降低tss (p值< 0.001)。bilastine和左西替利嗪治疗7 d后TSS与治疗14 d后TSS差异无统计学意义(p值= 0.41)。bilastine组有10%的患者报告了不良事件,而左西替利嗪组有38%的患者报告了不良事件。结论:Bilastine是一种选择性H1抗组胺药,疗效好,安全性好,建议作为变应性鼻结膜炎的一线治疗药物。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
A retrospective study to analyse the ocular morbidity in the slum-dwelling population of central India. Sleep-disordered breathing a neglected risk factor in primary open-angle glaucoma Effect of donor and host factors on corneal graft transparency Clinical patterns of Uveitis in a Regional Eye Institute of North India Comparison of conjunctival free autograft and Rotational flap technique in primary pterygium surgery: Visual changes and safety profiles
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1