The transformed water regulatory regime of South Africa [Discussion of South African Association for Water User Associations v Minister of Water and Sanitation [2020] ZAGPPHC 252 (19 June 2020)]

Germarie Viljoen
{"title":"The transformed water regulatory regime of South Africa [Discussion of South African Association for Water User Associations v Minister of Water and Sanitation [2020] ZAGPPHC 252 (19 June 2020)]","authors":"Germarie Viljoen","doi":"10.47348/slr/2022/i2a8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"A completely new water law dispensation, amounting to a regime change, was introduced with the National Water Act 36 of 1998. The water regulatory framework changed from one that linked access to water to land ownership and differentiated between private and public water, to a framework that applies to “all water” in South Africa and that acknowledges that “water belongs to all people”. To facilitate the notion that water belongs to all people, the legislature formally introduced the concept of public trusteeship into the country’s water law. Since the promulgation of the Act, there has been no attempt in reported case law to provide a thorough exposition of the impact of the concept of public trusteeship in the water law context. This case note explores how the High Court for the first time deliberated on the impact on the nature, form, extent and limits of use rights that can be acquired in water as a natural resource in the new regulatory regime.","PeriodicalId":325707,"journal":{"name":"Stellenbosch Law Review","volume":"15 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Stellenbosch Law Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.47348/slr/2022/i2a8","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

A completely new water law dispensation, amounting to a regime change, was introduced with the National Water Act 36 of 1998. The water regulatory framework changed from one that linked access to water to land ownership and differentiated between private and public water, to a framework that applies to “all water” in South Africa and that acknowledges that “water belongs to all people”. To facilitate the notion that water belongs to all people, the legislature formally introduced the concept of public trusteeship into the country’s water law. Since the promulgation of the Act, there has been no attempt in reported case law to provide a thorough exposition of the impact of the concept of public trusteeship in the water law context. This case note explores how the High Court for the first time deliberated on the impact on the nature, form, extent and limits of use rights that can be acquired in water as a natural resource in the new regulatory regime.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
南非水监管制度的变革[南非用水户协会协会与水和卫生部长的讨论[2020]ZAGPPHC 252(2020年6月19日)]
1998年第36号《国家水法》引入了一种全新的水法豁免制度,相当于一种制度的改变。水管理框架从一个将水的获取与土地所有权联系起来并区分私人和公共水的框架转变为一个适用于南非“所有水”并承认“水属于所有人”的框架。为了促进水属于所有人的概念,立法机关正式将公共托管的概念引入了国家的水法。自《法令》颁布以来,在已报告的判例法中,没有人试图全面阐述公共托管概念在水法范围内的影响。本案例说明探讨了高等法院如何首次审议在新的监管制度下,水作为一种自然资源可以获得的使用权对其性质、形式、范围和限制的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Providing Greater Clarity on the Meaning of Basic Education [Discussion of Moko V Acting Principal, Malusi Secondary School 2021 3 SA 323 (CC)] The best interests of the child in the face of COVID-19 travel restrictions: Analysing the rights of children and parents [Discussion of CD v Department of Social Development (5570/2020) [2020] ZAWCHC 25 (14 April 2020)] The Protection of the Environmental Rights and Interests of Children: A South African Perspective The Legal Combatting of B-BBEE Fronting Practices in South Africa – Past and Present King NNO V De Jager 2021 4 SA 1 (CC): Three Perspectives
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1