THE LINGUISTIC STRATEGIES DIFFERENCES BETWEEN MEN AND WOMEN POST GRADUATE STUDENTS OF ENGLISH EDUCATION PROGRAM OF UNDIKSHA SINGARAJA

Komang Trisna Sari Dewi
{"title":"THE LINGUISTIC STRATEGIES DIFFERENCES BETWEEN MEN AND WOMEN POST GRADUATE STUDENTS OF ENGLISH EDUCATION PROGRAM OF UNDIKSHA SINGARAJA","authors":"Komang Trisna Sari Dewi","doi":"10.25078/YB.V2I2.1028","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study focused on the analysis of linguistic strategies differences between men and women which was to investigate the linguistic strategies applied by male and female post graduate students of the English Education Program of UNDIKSHA Singaraja. This study was designed by using descriptive qualitative approach in which the data collected were analyzed qualitatively. The researcher acted as non-participant observer in which the data were gathered by recording the conversation done. The result of the data analysis showed that the data show that during the daily conversation, it can be found that the linguistic strategies applied by both male and female speakers. They use this kind of strategy in order to express their opinion or feeling. Moreover, from those conversations, the data which was related to the strategies was got. Based on data, it can be concluded that male and female post graduate students of the English Education Program of UNDIKSHA Singaraja, differ in applying linguistic strategies during their daily conversation. In having a conversation, men interrupt more than women and women show their silence response more often in their conversation rituals. Moreover, in raising the conversation topic, both men and women have different topic to be talked about. Men tend to speak about something which can put them in competitive situation, such as game whereas women tend to speak about something that can make them stand in the middle of solidarity, such as feelings. Besides, men also use indirectness to convey something that can low their status but women use indirectness because they felt they had lower status than men and they wanted to get pleasant experience of getting one’s way not because one demands it (power) but because the other person wants the same thing (solidarity).","PeriodicalId":315000,"journal":{"name":"Yavana Bhasha : Journal of English Language Education","volume":"72 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-08-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Yavana Bhasha : Journal of English Language Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.25078/YB.V2I2.1028","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study focused on the analysis of linguistic strategies differences between men and women which was to investigate the linguistic strategies applied by male and female post graduate students of the English Education Program of UNDIKSHA Singaraja. This study was designed by using descriptive qualitative approach in which the data collected were analyzed qualitatively. The researcher acted as non-participant observer in which the data were gathered by recording the conversation done. The result of the data analysis showed that the data show that during the daily conversation, it can be found that the linguistic strategies applied by both male and female speakers. They use this kind of strategy in order to express their opinion or feeling. Moreover, from those conversations, the data which was related to the strategies was got. Based on data, it can be concluded that male and female post graduate students of the English Education Program of UNDIKSHA Singaraja, differ in applying linguistic strategies during their daily conversation. In having a conversation, men interrupt more than women and women show their silence response more often in their conversation rituals. Moreover, in raising the conversation topic, both men and women have different topic to be talked about. Men tend to speak about something which can put them in competitive situation, such as game whereas women tend to speak about something that can make them stand in the middle of solidarity, such as feelings. Besides, men also use indirectness to convey something that can low their status but women use indirectness because they felt they had lower status than men and they wanted to get pleasant experience of getting one’s way not because one demands it (power) but because the other person wants the same thing (solidarity).
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
英语教育专业男女研究生的语言策略差异
本研究的重点是分析男女之间的语言策略差异,旨在调查UNDIKSHA Singaraja英语教育项目的男女研究生使用的语言策略。本研究采用描述性定性方法,对收集的数据进行定性分析。研究人员作为非参与者的观察者,通过记录所做的谈话来收集数据。数据分析的结果表明,数据表明,在日常会话中,可以发现男性和女性说话者所使用的语言策略。他们用这种策略来表达自己的观点或感受。此外,从这些对话中,获得了与策略相关的数据。根据数据,可以得出结论,UNDIKSHA Singaraja英语教育项目的男女研究生在日常会话中使用语言策略存在差异。在谈话中,男人比女人更爱插嘴,而女人在谈话中更常表现出沉默的反应。此外,在提出谈话话题时,男人和女人都有不同的话题可以谈论。男性倾向于谈论一些会让他们处于竞争状态的事情,比如游戏,而女性倾向于谈论一些会让他们站在团结中间的事情,比如感觉。此外,男性也使用间接来传达一些可以降低他们地位的东西,但女性使用间接是因为她们觉得自己的地位比男性低,她们想要获得随心所欲的愉快体验,不是因为一个人要求它(权力),而是因为另一个人想要同样的东西(团结)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
TEACHERS' QUESTIONS TO PROMOTE STUDENTS' CRITICAL THINKING IN EFL CLASS USING COOPERATIVE LEARNING MODEL WITH PEER TUTORS TO IMPROVE UNDERGRADUATE STUDENTS' READING ACHIEVEMENT THE EFFECTIVENESS OF USING VIDEO BLOGS (VLOGS) TO IMPROVE SENIOR HIGH SCHOOL STUDENTS' SPEAKING ABILITY CALL EVALUATION: STUDENTS' PERCEPTION AND CHALLENGES ON THE USE OF VLE AND GAME-BASED LEARNING THE FACTORS THAT INFLUENCE STUDENTS' INTEREST TO CHOOSE THE HOSPITALITY MAJORS
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1