Rates of Readmission and Emergency Department Visits of Publicly Versus Commercially Insured Patients in a Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery Accreditation and Quality Improvement Program Accredited Center

B. Clapp, Andres Vivar, Christian Castro, Jisoo Kim, Jesus Gamez, C. Dodoo, B. Davis
{"title":"Rates of Readmission and Emergency Department Visits of Publicly Versus Commercially Insured Patients in a Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery Accreditation and Quality Improvement Program Accredited Center","authors":"B. Clapp, Andres Vivar, Christian Castro, Jisoo Kim, Jesus Gamez, C. Dodoo, B. Davis","doi":"10.4293/JSLS.2022.00009","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Patients with governmental insurance are known to utilize the emergency department (ER) at a higher rate and have higher readmission rates than other patients. Twenty percent of our patients are publicly insured. Our objective was to determine if there was a higher rate of readmissions and ER visits within 30 days in publicly insured patients. Methods: Data was analyzed from a single center submitted to the Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery Accreditation and Quality Improvement Program Participant Use Data File from January 1, 2015 to December 31, 2018. We added insurance status and described quantitative variables using mean, and standard deviation (SD). These were reported as regression coefficients (RC) and prevalence ratio (PR), along with their 95% confidence interval (CI). P values of less than 5% were considered statistically significant. Results: The overall rate of ER visits, readmissions, and reoperations were 3.5%, 7.4%, and 2.2% respectively. Medicaid and Medicare patients were found to have longer operative times, 62.7 minutes vs 57.5 minutes (p = 0.35). Patients on public insurance had higher adjusted risk of ER visits (PR 1.43, 95% CI: 0.41–5.3; p = 0.58) and readmissions (PR 1.64, 95% CI: 0.76–3.55; p = 0.21) than patients on commercial/self-pay insurance. Re-operations were lower in the publicly insured group (PR 0.93, 95% CI: 0.2–4.7; p = 0.92) than patients on commercial/self-pay insurance. However, these outcomes were not statistically significant. Conclusions: Publicly insured patients tend to have a higher adjusted risk of ER visits and readmissions but was not statistically significant. The rate of re-operation was slightly lower in publicly insured patients.","PeriodicalId":114569,"journal":{"name":"JSLS : Journal of the Society of Laparoscopic & Robotic Surgeons","volume":"37 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JSLS : Journal of the Society of Laparoscopic & Robotic Surgeons","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4293/JSLS.2022.00009","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Patients with governmental insurance are known to utilize the emergency department (ER) at a higher rate and have higher readmission rates than other patients. Twenty percent of our patients are publicly insured. Our objective was to determine if there was a higher rate of readmissions and ER visits within 30 days in publicly insured patients. Methods: Data was analyzed from a single center submitted to the Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery Accreditation and Quality Improvement Program Participant Use Data File from January 1, 2015 to December 31, 2018. We added insurance status and described quantitative variables using mean, and standard deviation (SD). These were reported as regression coefficients (RC) and prevalence ratio (PR), along with their 95% confidence interval (CI). P values of less than 5% were considered statistically significant. Results: The overall rate of ER visits, readmissions, and reoperations were 3.5%, 7.4%, and 2.2% respectively. Medicaid and Medicare patients were found to have longer operative times, 62.7 minutes vs 57.5 minutes (p = 0.35). Patients on public insurance had higher adjusted risk of ER visits (PR 1.43, 95% CI: 0.41–5.3; p = 0.58) and readmissions (PR 1.64, 95% CI: 0.76–3.55; p = 0.21) than patients on commercial/self-pay insurance. Re-operations were lower in the publicly insured group (PR 0.93, 95% CI: 0.2–4.7; p = 0.92) than patients on commercial/self-pay insurance. However, these outcomes were not statistically significant. Conclusions: Publicly insured patients tend to have a higher adjusted risk of ER visits and readmissions but was not statistically significant. The rate of re-operation was slightly lower in publicly insured patients.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在代谢和减肥手术认证和质量改进计划认证中心,公共与商业保险患者的再入院率和急诊就诊率
背景:与其他患者相比,有政府保险的患者使用急诊科(ER)的比率更高,再入院率也更高。我们20%的病人都有公共保险。我们的目的是确定在公共保险患者中,30天内是否有更高的再入院率和急诊室就诊率。方法:对2015年1月1日至2018年12月31日提交给代谢和减肥手术认证和质量改进计划参与者使用数据文件的单个中心的数据进行分析。我们加入了保险状况,并使用均值和标准差(SD)来描述定量变量。这些结果以回归系数(RC)和患病率(PR)及其95%置信区间(CI)进行报告。P值小于5%被认为具有统计学意义。结果:急诊总就诊率、再入院率和再手术率分别为3.5%、7.4%和2.2%。医疗补助和医疗保险患者的手术时间更长,分别为62.7分钟和57.5分钟(p = 0.35)。公共保险患者就诊的调整风险较高(PR = 1.43, 95% CI: 0.41-5.3;p = 0.58)和再入院(PR 1.64, 95% CI: 0.76-3.55;P = 0.21)高于商业/自费保险患者。公共保险组的再手术率较低(PR 0.93, 95% CI: 0.2-4.7;P = 0.92)高于商业/自费保险患者。然而,这些结果没有统计学意义。结论:公共保险患者倾向于有更高的急诊室就诊和再入院的调整风险,但没有统计学意义。公共保险患者的再手术率略低。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Endoscopic Bariatric Therapies: Current Status and Future Perspectives Robotic Adrenalectomy: A 10-Year Clinical Experience at a Tertiary Medical Center Virtual SLS MIS 2021 Conference Abstract Supplement Feasibility of Laparoscopic Para-Aortic Lymphadenectomy for Locally Advanced Cervical Cancer Rates of Readmission and Emergency Department Visits of Publicly Versus Commercially Insured Patients in a Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery Accreditation and Quality Improvement Program Accredited Center
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1