ZELLNER’S G-PRIORS IN BAYESIAN MODEL AVERAGING OF LARGE MODEL SPACE USING MARKOV CHAIN MONTE CARLO MODEL COMPOSITION APPLICABLE UNDER BAYESIAN MODEL SAMPLING

O. K, D. I. A.
{"title":"ZELLNER’S G-PRIORS IN BAYESIAN MODEL AVERAGING OF LARGE MODEL SPACE USING MARKOV CHAIN MONTE CARLO MODEL COMPOSITION APPLICABLE UNDER BAYESIAN MODEL SAMPLING","authors":"O. K, D. I. A.","doi":"10.56892/bimajst.v6i02.350","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Applied researchers are frequently faced with the issue of model uncertainty in situations where many possible models exist. For large model space in regression analysis, the challenge has always been how to select a single model among competing large model space when making inferences. Bayesian Model Averaging (BMA) is a technique designed to help account for the uncertainty inherent in the model selection process. Informative prior distributions related to a natural conjugate prior specification are investigated under a limited choice of a single scalar hyper parameter called g-prior which corresponds to the degree of prior uncertainty on regression coefficients. This study focuses on situations with extremely large model space made up of large set of regressors generated by a small number of observations, when estimating model parameters. A set of g-prior structures in literature are considered with a view to identify an improved g-prior specification for regression coefficients in Bayesian Model Averaging. The study demonstrates the sensitivity of posterior results to the choice of g-prior on simulated dataand real-life data. Markov Chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) are used to generate a process which moves through large model space to adequately identify the high posterior probability models using the Markov Chain Monte Carlo Model Composition (MC3), a method applicable under Bayesian Model Sampling (BMS). To assess the sensitivity and predictive ability of the g-priors,predictive criteria like Log Predictive Score (LPS) and Log Marginal Likelihood (LML) are employed. The results reveal a g-prior structure that exhibited equally competitive and consistent predictive ability among considered g-prior structures in literature.","PeriodicalId":292938,"journal":{"name":"BIMA JOURNAL OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY (2536-6041)","volume":"20 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-08-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BIMA JOURNAL OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY (2536-6041)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.56892/bimajst.v6i02.350","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Applied researchers are frequently faced with the issue of model uncertainty in situations where many possible models exist. For large model space in regression analysis, the challenge has always been how to select a single model among competing large model space when making inferences. Bayesian Model Averaging (BMA) is a technique designed to help account for the uncertainty inherent in the model selection process. Informative prior distributions related to a natural conjugate prior specification are investigated under a limited choice of a single scalar hyper parameter called g-prior which corresponds to the degree of prior uncertainty on regression coefficients. This study focuses on situations with extremely large model space made up of large set of regressors generated by a small number of observations, when estimating model parameters. A set of g-prior structures in literature are considered with a view to identify an improved g-prior specification for regression coefficients in Bayesian Model Averaging. The study demonstrates the sensitivity of posterior results to the choice of g-prior on simulated dataand real-life data. Markov Chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) are used to generate a process which moves through large model space to adequately identify the high posterior probability models using the Markov Chain Monte Carlo Model Composition (MC3), a method applicable under Bayesian Model Sampling (BMS). To assess the sensitivity and predictive ability of the g-priors,predictive criteria like Log Predictive Score (LPS) and Log Marginal Likelihood (LML) are employed. The results reveal a g-prior structure that exhibited equally competitive and consistent predictive ability among considered g-prior structures in literature.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Zellner的g先验在贝叶斯模型中利用马尔可夫链蒙特卡罗模型组成对大模型空间进行平均,适用于贝叶斯模型抽样
在存在多种可能模型的情况下,应用研究人员经常面临模型不确定性的问题。对于回归分析中的大模型空间,如何在相互竞争的大模型空间中选择单个模型进行推理一直是一个难题。贝叶斯模型平均(BMA)是一种旨在帮助解释模型选择过程中固有的不确定性的技术。在有限选择一个称为g-prior的标量超参数的情况下,研究了与自然共轭先验规范相关的信息先验分布,该参数对应于回归系数的先验不确定性程度。本研究的重点是在估计模型参数时,由少量观测产生的大量回归量组成的模型空间非常大的情况。为了确定贝叶斯模型平均中回归系数的改进的g-prior规范,本文考虑了一组文献中的g-prior结构。研究表明,在模拟数据和实际数据上,后验结果对g先验选择的敏感性。马尔可夫链蒙特卡罗(MCMC)是利用适用于贝叶斯模型抽样(BMS)的马尔可夫链蒙特卡罗模型组成(MC3)方法,生成一个在大模型空间中移动的过程,以充分识别高后验概率模型。为了评估g先验的敏感性和预测能力,采用了Log predictive Score (LPS)和Log Marginal Likelihood (LML)等预测标准。结果表明,在文献中考虑的g-prior结构中,g-prior结构表现出同样的竞争和一致的预测能力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
TRACE ELEMENTS’ POLLUTION ASSESSMENT IN VEGETABLES FROM IRRIGATION AREAS OF DADIN KOWA DAM, GOMBE STATE, NIGERIA EVALUATION OF HAZARD INDICES OF BACKGROUND RADIATION IN SOME MAJOR TOWNS OF GOMBE STATE, NIGERIA CARDIOVASCULAR RISK FACTORS AND PRESCRIPTION PATTERN AMONG PATIENTS WITH TYPE 2 DIABETES MELLITUS IN NORTH-EAST NIGERIA PHYTOCHEMICAL SCREENING, In vitro ANTIOXIDANT AND GC-MS ANALYSIS OF Ziziphus mauritiana LEAVES EXTRACT DEPOSITIONAL ENVIRONMENT OF THE TERTIARY KERRI – KERRI FORMATION IN THE GONGOLA SUB-BASIN, NORTHERN BENUE TROUGH: PEBBLES MORPHOMETRIC AND GRAIN SIZE ANALYSIS APPROACH
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1