Relative Abundance in the Land of Oil: Reorganization of Extractive Resource Governance in Decentralizing Indonesia

Sakti Wira Yudha
{"title":"Relative Abundance in the Land of Oil: Reorganization of Extractive Resource Governance in Decentralizing Indonesia","authors":"Sakti Wira Yudha","doi":"10.32996/jhsss.2023.5.4.2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study aims to examine the governance of extractive resources by the state as an axis of development at the national and subnational levels. This study focuses on Indonesia and Bojonegoro Regency as the main unit of analysis. Using the method of historical sociology, this article argues that the institutional capacity of the state in the governance of extractive resources, particularly oil, depends on the extent to which the mechanisms of autonomy and distribution of state power are reorganized to achieve developmental transformation. The combination of historical evidence not only adds to the theoretical understanding of state social power but also contributes to development theory by adding a historical dimension. As a country with abundant natural resources, Indonesia has faced challenges in the governance of extractive resources since colonial times. The abundance of natural resources is not always linear with development outcomes in each period of governance. Indonesia has seventeen oil and gas-producing provinces. However, the resource curse still applies in eight provinces where the number of poor people is higher than the national average. The governance of Indonesia's extractive industries is no longer monopolized by the national government but involves subnational governments. Politically, many local governments have complained that the process of calculating, distributing and reporting oil and gas revenue-sharing funds often creates tensions between central and local governments. Synergies between the state and civil society in the governance of extractive resources are needed to accelerate development transformation. Historical experience shows that the limited distributive power of civil society in extractive resource governance hinders the process of accelerating development transformation in Indonesia.","PeriodicalId":431386,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences Studies","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.32996/jhsss.2023.5.4.2","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study aims to examine the governance of extractive resources by the state as an axis of development at the national and subnational levels. This study focuses on Indonesia and Bojonegoro Regency as the main unit of analysis. Using the method of historical sociology, this article argues that the institutional capacity of the state in the governance of extractive resources, particularly oil, depends on the extent to which the mechanisms of autonomy and distribution of state power are reorganized to achieve developmental transformation. The combination of historical evidence not only adds to the theoretical understanding of state social power but also contributes to development theory by adding a historical dimension. As a country with abundant natural resources, Indonesia has faced challenges in the governance of extractive resources since colonial times. The abundance of natural resources is not always linear with development outcomes in each period of governance. Indonesia has seventeen oil and gas-producing provinces. However, the resource curse still applies in eight provinces where the number of poor people is higher than the national average. The governance of Indonesia's extractive industries is no longer monopolized by the national government but involves subnational governments. Politically, many local governments have complained that the process of calculating, distributing and reporting oil and gas revenue-sharing funds often creates tensions between central and local governments. Synergies between the state and civil society in the governance of extractive resources are needed to accelerate development transformation. Historical experience shows that the limited distributive power of civil society in extractive resource governance hinders the process of accelerating development transformation in Indonesia.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
相对丰富的土地上的石油:重组的采掘资源治理在分散印度尼西亚
本研究旨在研究国家对采掘资源的治理,将其作为国家和次国家层面的发展轴心。本研究以印度尼西亚和博永内哥罗摄政为主要分析单位。本文运用历史社会学的方法,认为国家治理采掘资源(尤其是石油)的制度能力,取决于国家权力的自治和分配机制重组以实现发展转型的程度。历史证据的结合不仅增加了对国家社会权力的理论认识,而且通过增加历史维度为发展理论做出了贡献。作为一个自然资源丰富的国家,印尼自殖民时代以来就面临着采掘资源治理的挑战。在每个治理时期,自然资源的丰富程度并不总是与发展成果成线性关系。印尼有17个产油和产气省份。然而,在贫困人口数量高于全国平均水平的8个省份,“资源诅咒”仍然存在。印尼采掘业的管理不再由国家政府垄断,而是涉及地方政府。在政治上,许多地方政府抱怨说,计算、分配和报告油气收入分成基金的过程,往往会在中央和地方政府之间制造紧张关系。为了加快发展转型,需要国家和民间社会在采掘资源治理方面发挥协同作用。历史经验表明,民间社会在采掘业资源治理中的分配权力有限,阻碍了印尼加快发展转型的进程。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Cyberculture/Cyberspace as a Mode of Transmission of Cultures, Identities and Power Relations: A Theoretical Perspective Media Framework and Enterprise Management Analysis under Emergencies: “Earth Pit Pickled Cabbage” Incident as an Example Strengthening Ecological Citizenship by the “Sebarang Bersatu” Community Forest in Rehabilitation Forest and Land Former Tin Mining: Case Study in Juru Seberang Village, Belitung Regency Consideration of Cold War Factors after Second World War Issues of Gender in the First-Grade IT Textbook in Oman
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1