Chapter 9. Epistemic stance and authorial presence in scientific research writing

Jingjing Wang, F. Jiang
{"title":"Chapter 9. Epistemic stance and authorial presence in scientific research writing","authors":"Jingjing Wang, F. Jiang","doi":"10.1075/aals.18.09wan","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this study, we investigate hedges, boosters and self-mentions as main expressions of epistemic positioning and how much they are projected by explicit authorial presence in the research writings by Chinese PhD students and expert writers across four science disciplines. Results show that PhD science students used considerably more hedges, boosters and self-mentions than journal article writers. They exhibit an obvious preference for certain epistemic resources and an avoidance to hedge or boost their/others’ claims in their academic writings. The results are discussed with regard to different cultures, disciplines and writer groups, and pedagogical implications on L2 research writing instructions are also raised at the end of the chapter.","PeriodicalId":371971,"journal":{"name":"Intercultural Perspectives on Research Writing","volume":"24 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-11-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"7","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Intercultural Perspectives on Research Writing","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1075/aals.18.09wan","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7

Abstract

In this study, we investigate hedges, boosters and self-mentions as main expressions of epistemic positioning and how much they are projected by explicit authorial presence in the research writings by Chinese PhD students and expert writers across four science disciplines. Results show that PhD science students used considerably more hedges, boosters and self-mentions than journal article writers. They exhibit an obvious preference for certain epistemic resources and an avoidance to hedge or boost their/others’ claims in their academic writings. The results are discussed with regard to different cultures, disciplines and writer groups, and pedagogical implications on L2 research writing instructions are also raised at the end of the chapter.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
第9章。科研写作中的认识论立场与作者存在
在这项研究中,我们调查了模糊限制语、助推器和自我提及作为认知定位的主要表达方式,以及它们在四个科学学科的中国博士生和专家作者的研究文章中被明确作者存在的程度。结果显示,理科博士生比期刊文章作者使用更多的模糊限制语、助推器和自我提及。他们对某些知识资源表现出明显的偏好,并避免在学术著作中对冲或增强他们/他人的主张。研究结果在不同的文化、学科和作者群体中进行了讨论,并在本章的最后提出了二语研究性写作指导的教学意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Chapter 6. Chinese writers of English RAs as creators of a research space in a national context Chapter 12. Evaluation in research article introductions in the Social Sciences written by English as a Lingua Franca and English native users Chapter 1. A contrastive (English, Czech English, Czech) study of rhetorical functions of citations in Linguistics research articles Chapter 9. Epistemic stance and authorial presence in scientific research writing Chapter 8. Hybrid rhetorical structure in English Sociology research article abstracts
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1