Combining BIM and Last Planner on Construction Sites: an Investigation of the Related Challenges

Yaya Pitti, Conrad Boton, D. Forgues
{"title":"Combining BIM and Last Planner on Construction Sites: an Investigation of the Related Challenges","authors":"Yaya Pitti, Conrad Boton, D. Forgues","doi":"10.3311/CCC2019-113","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The construction industry is facing a gradual but important transformation towards more productivity and collaboration. In this \nframework, two major approaches are often cited in the literature as having the potential to improve the practices in the industry: \nBuilding Information Modeling (BIM) and Lean Construction. Several scientific studies have demonstrated the synergy of these \ntwo approaches and very recent research has reported positive results from the use of software applications as support for their \nimplementation on construction sites. However, the stakes of such integration have been very little studied. This article presents \nthe results of a research project conducted within a general contractor firm that decided to implement BIM and Last Planner \nSystem (LPS) on its construction sites. The research uses a four-stage action research approach, including the characterization of \nthe research issue, the establishment of an action plan, its implementation and its evaluation. \nCompared to recent related studies, the research is less enthusiastic. While it highlights the need for new tools to improve \nproduction planning and control, it also points to a strong resistance to change by practitioners at the site. They emphasize the \nnecessity for adequate pre-service training and the need for new resources that can work full-time on the ongoing training of site \nteams. In addition, some limitations of the tool lead workers to believe that it can quickly become a factor that slows down their \ndaily work rather than improving it.","PeriodicalId":231420,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the Creative Construction Conference 2019","volume":"40 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the Creative Construction Conference 2019","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3311/CCC2019-113","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

The construction industry is facing a gradual but important transformation towards more productivity and collaboration. In this framework, two major approaches are often cited in the literature as having the potential to improve the practices in the industry: Building Information Modeling (BIM) and Lean Construction. Several scientific studies have demonstrated the synergy of these two approaches and very recent research has reported positive results from the use of software applications as support for their implementation on construction sites. However, the stakes of such integration have been very little studied. This article presents the results of a research project conducted within a general contractor firm that decided to implement BIM and Last Planner System (LPS) on its construction sites. The research uses a four-stage action research approach, including the characterization of the research issue, the establishment of an action plan, its implementation and its evaluation. Compared to recent related studies, the research is less enthusiastic. While it highlights the need for new tools to improve production planning and control, it also points to a strong resistance to change by practitioners at the site. They emphasize the necessity for adequate pre-service training and the need for new resources that can work full-time on the ongoing training of site teams. In addition, some limitations of the tool lead workers to believe that it can quickly become a factor that slows down their daily work rather than improving it.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
BIM与建筑工地最后规划师的结合:相关挑战的调查
建筑行业正面临着一个渐进但重要的转变,即向更高的生产力和协作方向转变。在这个框架中,文献中经常引用两种主要方法,它们具有改进行业实践的潜力:建筑信息模型(BIM)和精益建筑。一些科学研究已经证明了这两种方法的协同作用,最近的研究报告了使用软件应用程序作为在建筑工地实施的支持的积极结果。然而,很少有人研究这种整合的利害关系。本文介绍了在一家总承包商公司内进行的研究项目的结果,该公司决定在其建筑工地实施BIM和最后规划师系统(LPS)。本研究采用四阶段行动研究方法,包括研究问题的特征、行动计划的制定、行动计划的实施和评估。与近年来的相关研究相比,该研究缺乏热情。虽然它强调了需要新的工具来改善生产计划和控制,但它也指出了现场从业者对变革的强烈抵制。他们强调有必要进行充分的职前培训,并需要新的资源,以便全时进行现场小组的持续培训。此外,该工具的一些局限性使工人认为,它可以很快成为一个因素,减慢他们的日常工作,而不是提高它。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Input for Hybrid Simulation Modelling Construction Operations What are the Barriers and Drivers Toward BIM Adoption in Nigeria? Ontology Assisted Collaboration Sessions on 4D BIM A Balanced Scorecard for Assessing Automation in Construction Traceability for Built Assets: Proposed Framework for a Digital Record
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1