Classification of Local Governments by Road Traffic Safety Characteristics

P. Subin, 최새로나, L. Young, Oh, Cheol
{"title":"Classification of Local Governments by Road Traffic Safety Characteristics","authors":"P. Subin, 최새로나, L. Young, Oh, Cheol","doi":"10.7470/JKST.2020.38.5.361","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"To achieve an ambitious goal to reduce fatalities to 2,796 by 2021 as described in the 8th National Road Safety Master Plan, we need to focus on implementing appropriate traffic safety strategies for hazardous areas in the field. Because budget, time and staff are limited, decision makers of local governments are required to set up ‘target accidents’, such as an accident type that had the highest traffic fatalities last year, to reduce traffic fatalities dramatically. However, when decision makers review traffic safety levels of their local governments, it is necessary to consider not only the number of traffic fatalities but also socio-economic characteristics and traffic conditions affecting probability of traffic accidents. This paper suggests a methodology to quantify traffic safety levels of local government in a variety of views such as traffic conditions, road environments, economic levels and traffic culture in each local government. Using a mixed clustering method, the paper classifies local governments as four groups that are defined as Robust-developED Local governments (R-ED), Vulnerable-devlopED Local governments (V-ED), Robust-developING Local governments (R-ING), and Vulnerable-developING Local governments (V-ING) considering traffic safety and socio-economic characteristics. As discussed in the results in the paper, it is expected that the methodology of the paper could be used to compare and monitor traffic safety levels of local governments for decision makers.","PeriodicalId":146954,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the Eastern Asia Society for Transportation Studies","volume":"46 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-10-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the Eastern Asia Society for Transportation Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7470/JKST.2020.38.5.361","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

To achieve an ambitious goal to reduce fatalities to 2,796 by 2021 as described in the 8th National Road Safety Master Plan, we need to focus on implementing appropriate traffic safety strategies for hazardous areas in the field. Because budget, time and staff are limited, decision makers of local governments are required to set up ‘target accidents’, such as an accident type that had the highest traffic fatalities last year, to reduce traffic fatalities dramatically. However, when decision makers review traffic safety levels of their local governments, it is necessary to consider not only the number of traffic fatalities but also socio-economic characteristics and traffic conditions affecting probability of traffic accidents. This paper suggests a methodology to quantify traffic safety levels of local government in a variety of views such as traffic conditions, road environments, economic levels and traffic culture in each local government. Using a mixed clustering method, the paper classifies local governments as four groups that are defined as Robust-developED Local governments (R-ED), Vulnerable-devlopED Local governments (V-ED), Robust-developING Local governments (R-ING), and Vulnerable-developING Local governments (V-ING) considering traffic safety and socio-economic characteristics. As discussed in the results in the paper, it is expected that the methodology of the paper could be used to compare and monitor traffic safety levels of local governments for decision makers.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
道路交通安全特征对地方政府的分类
为了实现《第八个国家道路安全总体规划》中所述的到2021年将死亡人数减少到2796人的宏伟目标,我们需要重点关注在现场危险地区实施适当的交通安全战略。由于预算、时间和人员有限,地方政府的决策者被要求制定“目标事故”,例如去年交通事故死亡率最高的事故类型,以大幅减少交通事故死亡率。然而,当决策者审查其地方政府的交通安全水平时,不仅需要考虑交通死亡人数,还需要考虑影响交通事故概率的社会经济特征和交通条件。本文提出了一种量化地方政府交通安全水平的方法,可以从各个地方政府的交通状况、道路环境、经济水平和交通文化等多种角度来量化地方政府的交通安全水平。基于交通安全和社会经济特征,采用混合聚类方法将地方政府划分为四类,分别为稳健发展型地方政府(R-ED)、脆弱发展型地方政府(V-ED)、稳健发展型地方政府(R-ING)和脆弱发展型地方政府(V-ING)。正如本文结果中所讨论的那样,预计本文的方法可以用于比较和监测地方政府的交通安全水平,以供决策者使用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Study on Estimation the Benefits of Transportation Investment Project Using the Consumer Surplus Benefit Method Developing Evaluation Methodology of Progression for Signalized Arteries Using Car Trajectory Data Analyzing the Impact of Flight Delay on Commercial Revenues at Airport Analysis of Aircraft Delay Factors at Jeju International Airport Recurrent Congestion Severity Priority Analysis Methodology Based On Mobility Big-Data
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1