{"title":"The relationship between coaching leadership behaviors and burnout of male athletes","authors":"M. Salehian, Mojtaba Mojtaba Sheikh Moghaddasi","doi":"10.52547/hases.1.1.80","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Copyright: © 2021 by the authors. Submitted for possible open access publication under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license. Abstract: The purpose of this study was to investigate relationship between coaching leadership behaviors and burnout (physical and emotional exhaustion, feeling of progression and feeling of unworthy) in male athletes. This was an applied and descriptive study. The statistical population of this research was all male athletes in age range of 18-23 (young). A total of 196 athletes were selected by simple random sampling. The instrument of study included two questionnaires: Raedeke & Smith (2001) Athletes 'Burnout Questionnaire and Chelladurai (1998) Coaching Leadership Report. Their internal consistency with Cronbach's alpha for athletes' burnout questionnaire was 0.765 and leadership behaviors of coaches 0.784. Pearson correlation coefficient and regression analysis and SPSS-22 software were used to investigate the hypotheses. A linear model (structural equation) was used to present the model. According to findings of research, coaches are more likely to use behavioral training and less than arbitrary behavior. There was a significant relationship between behavioral training behavior and all scales (physical exhaustion, feelings of depreciation and reduction of progress), between the authoritarian behavior and physical-emotional exhaustion scales, and feeling of progression reduction in scorpion between democratic behavior and a significant positive correlation scale of progress reduction feeling and bu.","PeriodicalId":278976,"journal":{"name":"Humanistic Approach to Sport and Exercise Studies (HASES)","volume":"11 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Humanistic Approach to Sport and Exercise Studies (HASES)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.52547/hases.1.1.80","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
男运动员教练领导行为与职业倦怠的关系
版权所有:©2021作者。在知识共享署名(CC BY)许可的条款和条件下,为可能的开放获取出版物而提交。摘要:本研究旨在探讨教练领导行为与男运动员职业倦怠(身心耗竭、进步感和无价值感)的关系。这是一项应用描述性研究。本研究的统计人群均为18-23岁(年轻)的男性运动员。采用简单随机抽样的方法,共选出196名运动员。研究工具包括两份问卷:Raedeke & Smith(2001)运动员倦怠问卷和Chelladurai(1998)教练领导力报告。运动员倦怠问卷与Cronbach’s alpha的内部一致性为0.765,教练员领导行为与Cronbach’s alpha的内部一致性为0.784。采用Pearson相关系数、回归分析及SPSS-22软件对假设进行检验。采用线性模型(结构方程)来表示模型。根据研究发现,教练更倾向于使用行为训练,而不是随意的行为。行为训练行为与所有量表(身体疲惫、贬低感和进步减少)、专制行为与身心疲惫量表、民主行为与进步减少感和进步减少感量表之间存在显著正相关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。