Prediction of Financial Strength Ratings Using Machine Learning and Conventional Techniques

Hussein A. Abdou, Wael Abdallah, James Mulkeen, C. Ntim, Yan Wang
{"title":"Prediction of Financial Strength Ratings Using Machine Learning and Conventional Techniques","authors":"Hussein A. Abdou, Wael Abdallah, James Mulkeen, C. Ntim, Yan Wang","doi":"10.21511/IMFI.14(4).2017.16","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Financial strength ratings (FSRs) have become more significant particularly since the recent financial crisis of 2007-09 where rating agencies failed to forecast defaults and the downgrade of some banks. The aim of this paper is to predict Capital Intelligence banks’ financial strength ratings (FSRs) group membership using machine learning and conventional techniques. Here we use five different statistical techniques, namely CHAID, CART, multilayer-perceptron neural networks, discriminant analysis and logistic regression. We also use three different evaluation criteria namely average correct classification rate, misclassification cost and gains charts. Our data is collected from Bankscope database for the Middle Eastern commercial banks by reference to the first decade in the 21st Century. Our findings show that when predicting bank FSRs during the period 2007-2009, discriminant analysis is surprisingly superior to all other techniques used in this paper. When only machine learning techniques are used, CHAID outperform other techniques. In addition, our findings highlight that when a random sample is used to predict bank FSRs, CART outperform all other techniques. Our evaluation criteria have confirmed our findings and both CART and discriminant analysis are superior to other techniques in predicting bank FSRs. This has implications for Middle Eastern banks as we would suggest that improving their bank FSR can improve their presence in the market.","PeriodicalId":346559,"journal":{"name":"Innovation Measurement & Indicators eJournal","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-12-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"15","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Innovation Measurement & Indicators eJournal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21511/IMFI.14(4).2017.16","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 15

Abstract

Financial strength ratings (FSRs) have become more significant particularly since the recent financial crisis of 2007-09 where rating agencies failed to forecast defaults and the downgrade of some banks. The aim of this paper is to predict Capital Intelligence banks’ financial strength ratings (FSRs) group membership using machine learning and conventional techniques. Here we use five different statistical techniques, namely CHAID, CART, multilayer-perceptron neural networks, discriminant analysis and logistic regression. We also use three different evaluation criteria namely average correct classification rate, misclassification cost and gains charts. Our data is collected from Bankscope database for the Middle Eastern commercial banks by reference to the first decade in the 21st Century. Our findings show that when predicting bank FSRs during the period 2007-2009, discriminant analysis is surprisingly superior to all other techniques used in this paper. When only machine learning techniques are used, CHAID outperform other techniques. In addition, our findings highlight that when a random sample is used to predict bank FSRs, CART outperform all other techniques. Our evaluation criteria have confirmed our findings and both CART and discriminant analysis are superior to other techniques in predicting bank FSRs. This has implications for Middle Eastern banks as we would suggest that improving their bank FSR can improve their presence in the market.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
使用机器学习和传统技术预测财务实力评级
金融实力评级(FSRs)变得更加重要,尤其是自2007-09年的金融危机以来,当时评级机构未能预测到一些银行的违约和降级。本文的目的是利用机器学习和传统技术预测资本情报银行的财务实力评级(FSRs)小组成员。在这里,我们使用了五种不同的统计技术,即CHAID、CART、多层感知器神经网络、判别分析和逻辑回归。我们还使用了三种不同的评价标准,即平均正确分类率、错误分类成本和收益图。我们的数据是参照21世纪第一个十年从Bankscope数据库中收集的中东商业银行数据。我们的研究结果表明,在预测2007-2009年银行金融稳定率时,判别分析比本文中使用的所有其他技术都要优越得多。当只使用机器学习技术时,CHAID优于其他技术。此外,我们的研究结果强调,当使用随机样本来预测银行fsr时,CART优于所有其他技术。我们的评估标准证实了我们的发现,CART和判别分析在预测银行fsr方面优于其他技术。这对中东银行有影响,因为我们认为,改善银行FSR可以改善它们在市场上的存在。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Disregarding the Shoulders of Giants: Inferences from Innovation Research Exploration and Exploitation in US Technological Change The Arms Race of Models: Complexify or Die Destabilization and Consolidation: Conceptualizing, Measuring, and Validating the Dual Characteristics of Technology Patent Classification Systems and Technological Categorization: An Overview and Data Update
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1