Thematic Review of Canadian Engineering Education Research between 2017-2021

Austin Martins-Robalino, Aurora Wang, Bronwyn Chorlton, J. Gales
{"title":"Thematic Review of Canadian Engineering Education Research between 2017-2021","authors":"Austin Martins-Robalino, Aurora Wang, Bronwyn Chorlton, J. Gales","doi":"10.24908/pceea.vi.15952","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Trends in engineering education have shifted over time, with teaching methods adapting to facilitate student learning [1], and the importance of equity, diversity and inclusivity (EDI) coming to the forefront [2]. It is important to understand the trends in engineering education to assess where we are coming from and where things currently stand in terms of teaching methods, culture, and pedagogy, to guide engineering educators and researchers moving forward. The purpose of this paper is to provide an overview of thematic trends in past CEEA papers over the previous five years (2017-2021), exploring shifts and evolutions in the major topics discussed as well as looking at the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on engineering education research. Papers were analyzed from the 2017-2021 CEEA proceedings. By studying the frequency of main themes in papers for each year, the popularity of subjects that have been trending were determined, allowing for an analysis of the major trends seen year over year. During the period under review, institutions across Canada transitioned to online learning in response to the COVID-19 pandemic. This resulted in a prevalent thematic shift in paper topics towards an increased interest regarding pure online delivery of a course during the COVID-19 pandemic. Prior to the 2021 proceedings, which saw 41 (41.8%) papers discuss online learning in some form, research into this topic generally had little traction with 2017 having the next highest frequency of 17 (10.2%) publications, and 2018-2020 each having under five publications on this topic. Up until 2021, the focus on teaching beyond conventional formats had been primarily on mixed delivery (such as flipped classrooms and blended learning), as opposed to purely online. Other trends observed from the analysis include the importance of K-12 outreach with this theme seeing most focus at the CEEA 2020 conference with seven (7.9%) papers discussing this topic. In addition to the changing trends in topics, a discussion on the ambiguity of research and practice-based papers and their definition was undertaken. This analysis will assist engineering educators to understand the research topics of interest that past CEEA submissions have gravitated towards, and will highlight topics that are important, but are presently understudied.","PeriodicalId":314914,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the Canadian Engineering Education Association (CEEA)","volume":"33 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the Canadian Engineering Education Association (CEEA)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24908/pceea.vi.15952","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Trends in engineering education have shifted over time, with teaching methods adapting to facilitate student learning [1], and the importance of equity, diversity and inclusivity (EDI) coming to the forefront [2]. It is important to understand the trends in engineering education to assess where we are coming from and where things currently stand in terms of teaching methods, culture, and pedagogy, to guide engineering educators and researchers moving forward. The purpose of this paper is to provide an overview of thematic trends in past CEEA papers over the previous five years (2017-2021), exploring shifts and evolutions in the major topics discussed as well as looking at the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on engineering education research. Papers were analyzed from the 2017-2021 CEEA proceedings. By studying the frequency of main themes in papers for each year, the popularity of subjects that have been trending were determined, allowing for an analysis of the major trends seen year over year. During the period under review, institutions across Canada transitioned to online learning in response to the COVID-19 pandemic. This resulted in a prevalent thematic shift in paper topics towards an increased interest regarding pure online delivery of a course during the COVID-19 pandemic. Prior to the 2021 proceedings, which saw 41 (41.8%) papers discuss online learning in some form, research into this topic generally had little traction with 2017 having the next highest frequency of 17 (10.2%) publications, and 2018-2020 each having under five publications on this topic. Up until 2021, the focus on teaching beyond conventional formats had been primarily on mixed delivery (such as flipped classrooms and blended learning), as opposed to purely online. Other trends observed from the analysis include the importance of K-12 outreach with this theme seeing most focus at the CEEA 2020 conference with seven (7.9%) papers discussing this topic. In addition to the changing trends in topics, a discussion on the ambiguity of research and practice-based papers and their definition was undertaken. This analysis will assist engineering educators to understand the research topics of interest that past CEEA submissions have gravitated towards, and will highlight topics that are important, but are presently understudied.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
2017-2021年加拿大工程教育研究专题回顾
随着时间的推移,工程教育的趋势发生了变化,教学方法不断适应,以促进学生的学习[1],公平、多样性和包容性(EDI)的重要性日益突出[2]。重要的是要了解工程教育的趋势,以评估我们从哪里来,以及目前在教学方法,文化和教学法方面的情况,以指导工程教育者和研究人员前进。本文的目的是概述过去五年(2017-2021年)CEEA论文的主题趋势,探讨所讨论的主要主题的变化和演变,以及研究COVID-19大流行对工程教育研究的影响。论文分析来自2017-2021年CEEA会议录。通过研究每年论文中主要主题的出现频率,确定了有趋势的主题的受欢迎程度,从而可以分析每年的主要趋势。在本报告所述期间,为应对COVID-19大流行,加拿大各地的机构都转向了在线学习。这导致论文主题普遍转向对COVID-19大流行期间纯在线交付课程的兴趣增加。在2021年的会议记录中,有41篇(41.8%)论文以某种形式讨论了在线学习,在此之前,对这一主题的研究通常没有什么吸引力,2017年的频率次之,有17篇(10.2%)出版物,2018-2020年各有不到5篇关于这一主题的出版物。直到2021年,传统教学模式之外的教学重点主要是混合教学(如翻转课堂和混合学习),而不是纯粹的在线教学。从分析中观察到的其他趋势包括K-12外展的重要性,这一主题在CEEA 2020会议上最受关注,有7篇(7.9%)论文讨论了这一主题。除了主题的变化趋势外,还讨论了基于研究和实践的论文及其定义的模糊性。这一分析将有助于工程教育工作者了解过去CEEA提交的研究主题,并将突出显示重要但目前尚未得到充分研究的主题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
What Makes an Exemplary Engineering Leader? In the Words of Engineers Questioning Green Growth and Sustainable Development in Undergraduate Engineering Memorization: Friend or Foe when Solving Problems in STEM Undergraduate Courses Persistent mistakes in learning basic circuit analysis Development and Assessment of a Training Module on Intellectual Property Literacy
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1