Improving the Learning Experience within MCAD Education: A Tool for Students to Assist in Self-Assessment during Modeling Exercises

F. Mandorli, Herald Otto
{"title":"Improving the Learning Experience within MCAD Education: A Tool for Students to Assist in Self-Assessment during Modeling Exercises","authors":"F. Mandorli, Herald Otto","doi":"10.14733/CADCONFP.2021.149-153","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: Current developments and recent work in educational research have been aimed at creating awareness of and addressing the most prominent shortcomings and failures of current CAD education, in particular at institutions of higher education. Such efforts have provided new insights and recommendations, although the work is still limited and the results sometimes contradictory. Obviously, there is demand for a change of focus in traditional CAD education from the declarative knowledge relating to geometric algorithms and commands required for operating a CAD system, in the literature referred to as command knowledge, toward knowledge and expertise which can transcend a particular CAD system. This demand highlights the need for higher level thinking relating to what is commonly known as strategic knowledge, i.e. knowledge of the different methods of achieving a specific task (goal) and knowing how to choose among those methods. This requires, among other factors, a high-quality learning experience during frequent educational exercises in the CAD laboratory, providing opportunities for students to experience both design and creation of their own CAD models and the re-design and alteration of them. This also includes promoting good design practice by relating CAD model attributes and parameters to part functionality and design intent, which, in turn, depends on the restructuring of curricula. Current efforts are aimed at designing alternative teaching approaches and integrating suitable elements of those into CAD education so that it is transformed into a more student-centered, learning-oriented and practice-oriented system. It needs to be better structured so that it efficiently and effectively matches actual student learning outcomes with skills and competencies related to, among other attributes, spatial ability and mental visualization, cognitive model composition, meta-cognitive processes including planning, predicting, revision, and, most importantly, self-assessment and self-regulation (cf. [9,11,12]).","PeriodicalId":166025,"journal":{"name":"CAD'21 Proceedings","volume":"1229 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-05-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"CAD'21 Proceedings","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14733/CADCONFP.2021.149-153","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Introduction: Current developments and recent work in educational research have been aimed at creating awareness of and addressing the most prominent shortcomings and failures of current CAD education, in particular at institutions of higher education. Such efforts have provided new insights and recommendations, although the work is still limited and the results sometimes contradictory. Obviously, there is demand for a change of focus in traditional CAD education from the declarative knowledge relating to geometric algorithms and commands required for operating a CAD system, in the literature referred to as command knowledge, toward knowledge and expertise which can transcend a particular CAD system. This demand highlights the need for higher level thinking relating to what is commonly known as strategic knowledge, i.e. knowledge of the different methods of achieving a specific task (goal) and knowing how to choose among those methods. This requires, among other factors, a high-quality learning experience during frequent educational exercises in the CAD laboratory, providing opportunities for students to experience both design and creation of their own CAD models and the re-design and alteration of them. This also includes promoting good design practice by relating CAD model attributes and parameters to part functionality and design intent, which, in turn, depends on the restructuring of curricula. Current efforts are aimed at designing alternative teaching approaches and integrating suitable elements of those into CAD education so that it is transformed into a more student-centered, learning-oriented and practice-oriented system. It needs to be better structured so that it efficiently and effectively matches actual student learning outcomes with skills and competencies related to, among other attributes, spatial ability and mental visualization, cognitive model composition, meta-cognitive processes including planning, predicting, revision, and, most importantly, self-assessment and self-regulation (cf. [9,11,12]).
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
改善MCAD教育中的学习体验:学生在建模练习中协助自我评估的工具
导读:目前教育研究的发展和最近的工作旨在提高人们对当前CAD教育的认识,并解决当前CAD教育中最突出的缺点和失败,特别是在高等教育机构。这些努力提供了新的见解和建议,尽管工作仍然有限,结果有时相互矛盾。显然,传统CAD教育的重点需要从与操作CAD系统所需的几何算法和命令相关的说明性知识(在文献中称为命令知识)转变为可以超越特定CAD系统的知识和专业知识。这种需求强调了对更高层次思维的需求,这种思维通常被称为战略知识,即了解实现特定任务(目标)的不同方法,并知道如何在这些方法中进行选择。除其他因素外,这需要在CAD实验室频繁的教学练习中获得高质量的学习体验,为学生提供体验设计和创建自己的CAD模型以及重新设计和更改模型的机会。这也包括通过将CAD模型属性和参数与零件功能和设计意图相关联来促进良好的设计实践,这反过来又取决于课程的重组。目前的努力旨在设计替代教学方法,并将这些方法中的适当元素纳入CAD教育,使其转变为一个更以学生为中心、以学习为导向和以实践为导向的系统。它需要更好的结构,以便有效地将学生的实际学习成果与空间能力和心理可视化、认知模型组成、元认知过程(包括计划、预测、修订,以及最重要的自我评估和自我调节)等属性相关的技能和能力相匹配(参见[9,11,12])。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Interior Ball-Pivoting on Point Clouds for Offsetting Triangular Meshes Modeling Coverage Areas of Anisotropic Transmitters by Voronoi-like Structures Hybrid Line-Arc Toolpath Machining with Corner Transition and Grouping Lookahead Scheme A Semi-Automatic CAD Procedure to Design Custom-made Surgical Cutting Guides Comparative Study of 3D Reconstruction Methods for Medical Imaging
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1