Disease-related knowledge, health behaviours and clinical outcomes following an educational intervention in patients with diabetes according to their health literacy level: a systematic review

G. Chaves, R. Britto, P. Oh, G. Ghisi
{"title":"Disease-related knowledge, health behaviours and clinical outcomes following an educational intervention in patients with diabetes according to their health literacy level: a systematic review","authors":"G. Chaves, R. Britto, P. Oh, G. Ghisi","doi":"10.4322/2675-9977.cpcr.42809","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: The effectiveness of education programs designed to improve disease-related knowledge and change behaviours in people with diabetes has been established. Low health literacy (HL) is considered a barrier to improving health outcomes in people with diabetes. The evidence of the effects of education programs considering HL levels in diabetes has not been previously systematically reviewed. Aim: This systematic review aimed to verify the impact of education on patients’ knowledge, health behaviour change and clinical outcomes in patients with diabetes with low and marginal Health Literacy (HL). Methods: A literature search of electronic databases was conducted for published articles from database inception to April 2020. Eligible articles included assessment of HL, disease-related knowledge, health behaviours (physical activity, diet, smoking cessation, medication adherence, self-care), and clinical outcomes (diabetes management based on A1C values, self-efficacy, perceived susceptibility of complications, self-reported medical care, patient activation, and diabetes-related distress) in diabetes patients that receive any type of education intervention. Results: Overall, 8 articles were included, of which 4 (50%) were RCTs. Four studies were considered “fair” quality. The most used screening instrument to assess HL was the Test of Functional Health Literacy in Adults short form (S-TOFHLA; n=5, 62.5%). All studies showed improvement in disease-related knowledge and behaviour after an education program, regardless of HL level. The overall quality of the evidence of the studies was graded as low to very low according to the GRADE scale. Included studies differed substantially in their education programs characteristics, such as mode of delivery and intervention content. Conclusion: Educational interventions can improve knowledge, change behaviour and improve clinical outcomes of diabetic patients with low or marginal health literacy.","PeriodicalId":164984,"journal":{"name":"Cardiorespiratory Physiotherapy, Critical Care and Rehabilitation","volume":"8 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cardiorespiratory Physiotherapy, Critical Care and Rehabilitation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4322/2675-9977.cpcr.42809","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Background: The effectiveness of education programs designed to improve disease-related knowledge and change behaviours in people with diabetes has been established. Low health literacy (HL) is considered a barrier to improving health outcomes in people with diabetes. The evidence of the effects of education programs considering HL levels in diabetes has not been previously systematically reviewed. Aim: This systematic review aimed to verify the impact of education on patients’ knowledge, health behaviour change and clinical outcomes in patients with diabetes with low and marginal Health Literacy (HL). Methods: A literature search of electronic databases was conducted for published articles from database inception to April 2020. Eligible articles included assessment of HL, disease-related knowledge, health behaviours (physical activity, diet, smoking cessation, medication adherence, self-care), and clinical outcomes (diabetes management based on A1C values, self-efficacy, perceived susceptibility of complications, self-reported medical care, patient activation, and diabetes-related distress) in diabetes patients that receive any type of education intervention. Results: Overall, 8 articles were included, of which 4 (50%) were RCTs. Four studies were considered “fair” quality. The most used screening instrument to assess HL was the Test of Functional Health Literacy in Adults short form (S-TOFHLA; n=5, 62.5%). All studies showed improvement in disease-related knowledge and behaviour after an education program, regardless of HL level. The overall quality of the evidence of the studies was graded as low to very low according to the GRADE scale. Included studies differed substantially in their education programs characteristics, such as mode of delivery and intervention content. Conclusion: Educational interventions can improve knowledge, change behaviour and improve clinical outcomes of diabetic patients with low or marginal health literacy.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
糖尿病患者健康素养水平教育干预后的疾病相关知识、健康行为和临床结果:一项系统综述
背景:旨在提高糖尿病患者疾病相关知识和改变糖尿病患者行为的教育项目的有效性已经得到证实。低健康素养(HL)被认为是改善糖尿病患者健康结果的一个障碍。考虑到糖尿病中HL水平的教育计划的影响的证据以前没有被系统地回顾过。目的:本系统综述旨在验证教育对低和边缘健康素养(HL)糖尿病患者的知识、健康行为改变和临床结果的影响。方法:检索电子数据库自建库至2020年4月的已发表文章。符合条件的文章包括接受任何类型教育干预的糖尿病患者的HL、疾病相关知识、健康行为(体育活动、饮食、戒烟、药物依从性、自我保健)和临床结果(基于A1C值的糖尿病管理、自我效能感、并发症易感性、自我报告的医疗保健、患者激活和糖尿病相关痛苦)的评估。结果:共纳入8篇文章,其中4篇(50%)为随机对照试验。4项研究被认为质量“一般”。评估HL最常用的筛查工具是成人功能健康素养测试(S-TOFHLA;n = 5, 62.5%)。所有研究均显示,无论HL水平如何,教育计划后疾病相关知识和行为均有所改善。根据GRADE量表,研究证据的总体质量被分为低到极低。纳入的研究在其教育项目特征上存在很大差异,例如交付模式和干预内容。结论:教育干预可以提高低健康素养或边缘健康素养糖尿病患者的知识,改变其行为,改善其临床结局。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Analysis of heart rate variability and accelerometry in patients following surgery for the treatment of gastrointestinal cancer In-hospital mobilization after cardiac surgery: investigation of a dose-effect of once- and twice-daily exercise on cardiac autonomic modulation Can diaphragmatic mobility be measured by chest wall volumes? Disease-related knowledge, health behaviours and clinical outcomes following an educational intervention in patients with diabetes according to their health literacy level: a systematic review Cardiorespiratory Physiotherapy, Critical Care and Rehabilitation (CPCR) journal: a new source of scientific knowledge for physiotherapy clinicians and researchers
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1