Which Critique of Human Rights? Evaluating the post-colonialist and the post-Althusserian alternatives

Alex Cistelecan
{"title":"Which Critique of Human Rights? Evaluating the post-colonialist and the post-Althusserian alternatives","authors":"Alex Cistelecan","doi":"10.4324/9780203814031-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In a short pamphlet written in 1808 bearing the title Who thinks abstractly?, Hegel joined his contemporary debates concerning the importance of the recent French Revolution. His position basically reverts the arguments advanced by the German nationalists and by various conservatives like Joseph de Maistre or Edmund Burke: while these authors accuse the abstraction of the French principles (equality, liberty etc.) and oppose to it the richness of the local customs, traditions and common sense, Hegel argues that, on the contrary, it is the common sense and common people who think abstractly, while the presumably abstract principles of the French revolution open up the space in which a concrete understanding of human nature can take place. In today’s world, one could say that the legacy of human rights is in need of a similar Hegelian reversal. The general trend regarding human rights consists nowadays in a constant attack on the formal, empty, abstract nature of the declaration of human rights, and an emphasis on the possible alternatives to it, namely the plural, rich, vivid, authentic particular cultures, narratives, situations. To put it in Hegelian terms, this contemporary trend could be accounted as demanding a necessary passage from ‘abstract right’ to ‘morality’ – where morality is to be","PeriodicalId":296400,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Žižek Studies","volume":"98 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-03-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"11","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Žižek Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203814031-6","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 11

Abstract

In a short pamphlet written in 1808 bearing the title Who thinks abstractly?, Hegel joined his contemporary debates concerning the importance of the recent French Revolution. His position basically reverts the arguments advanced by the German nationalists and by various conservatives like Joseph de Maistre or Edmund Burke: while these authors accuse the abstraction of the French principles (equality, liberty etc.) and oppose to it the richness of the local customs, traditions and common sense, Hegel argues that, on the contrary, it is the common sense and common people who think abstractly, while the presumably abstract principles of the French revolution open up the space in which a concrete understanding of human nature can take place. In today’s world, one could say that the legacy of human rights is in need of a similar Hegelian reversal. The general trend regarding human rights consists nowadays in a constant attack on the formal, empty, abstract nature of the declaration of human rights, and an emphasis on the possible alternatives to it, namely the plural, rich, vivid, authentic particular cultures, narratives, situations. To put it in Hegelian terms, this contemporary trend could be accounted as demanding a necessary passage from ‘abstract right’ to ‘morality’ – where morality is to be
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
哪种人权批判?评价后殖民主义和后阿尔都塞主义的选择
在1808年写的一本题为《谁在抽象地思考?》黑格尔加入了当时关于法国大革命重要性的辩论。他的立场基本上推翻了德国民族主义者和约瑟夫·德·迈斯特尔和埃德蒙·伯克等保守派提出的观点虽然这些作者指责法国原则(平等、自由等)的抽象,并反对丰富的地方习俗、传统和常识,但黑格尔认为,恰恰相反,是常识和普通人在抽象地思考,而法国大革命的抽象原则则为具体理解人性开辟了空间。在今天的世界里,人们可以说,人权的遗产需要一个类似的黑格尔式的逆转。目前关于人权的总趋势是不断攻击人权宣言的形式、空洞和抽象性质,并强调它的可能替代方案,即多元、丰富、生动、真实的特定文化、叙述和情况。用黑格尔的术语来说,这种当代趋势可以被认为是要求从“抽象权利”到“道德”的必要通道——道德应该在哪里
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Žižek, universalismo y colonialismo: doce tesis para no aceptarlo todo From Kant to Hegel Still Dancing: drive as a category of political economy The Real Internet Which Critique of Human Rights? Evaluating the post-colonialist and the post-Althusserian alternatives
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1