False-Positive T-Cell Cytotoxicity Crossmatch Results Due to Autoantibodies in Korean Network for Organ Sharing Crossmatch Tests

Hyejin Park, Byungho Lee, Y. Lim, B. Han, E. Song, M. Park
{"title":"False-Positive T-Cell Cytotoxicity Crossmatch Results Due to Autoantibodies in Korean Network for Organ Sharing Crossmatch Tests","authors":"Hyejin Park, Byungho Lee, Y. Lim, B. Han, E. Song, M. Park","doi":"10.4285/JKSTN.2017.31.3.150","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Basic National Institute of Health (NIH) and sensitive antihuman globulin (AHG) methods are widely used for T-cell complement-dependent cytotoxicity crossmatch (XM) tests. Whereas NIH-negative, AHG-positive (NIH-/AHG+) results are caused by weak antibodies, NIH+/AHG- results are usually due to autoantibodies. We found that solid organ transplantation candidates with NIH+/AHG- XM results are repeatedly excluded from allocation of deceased donor organs by the Korean Network for Organ Sharing (KONOS) allocation system. Here, we attempted to demonstrate that these patients do not have donor-specific HLA antibodies (DSAs). \nMethods: Sera showing NIH+/AHG- results in the analysis of 1,668 KONOS T-cell XM tests were screened for panel reactive antibody (PRA) using a Luminex test. For screen-positive samples, antibody identification was conducted using a Luminex single antigen assay and the presence or absence of class I DSAs was determined. For positive controls, 42 KONOS XM tests showing probable true-positive (NIH-/AHG+ or NIH+/AHG+) results were reviewed for PRA results based on electronic medical records and the presence or absence of DSAs was determined. \nResults: NIH+/AHG- results were observed in 1.3% (21/1,668) of KONOS XM tests analyzed. Most of these (18/21, 85.7%) were negative for PRA or DSAs. All probable true-positive cases were either positive for DSAs (24/42, 57.1%) or had high PRA (mean, 92% [range; 42%∼100%]), complicating accurate identification of antibody specificities. \nConclusions: NIH+/AHG- results are not rare (1.3%) in KONOS XM tests. Most of these results are not due to DSAs, and these patients should not be excluded from organ allocation.","PeriodicalId":420886,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of The Korean Society for Transplantation","volume":"108 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Journal of The Korean Society for Transplantation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4285/JKSTN.2017.31.3.150","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Basic National Institute of Health (NIH) and sensitive antihuman globulin (AHG) methods are widely used for T-cell complement-dependent cytotoxicity crossmatch (XM) tests. Whereas NIH-negative, AHG-positive (NIH-/AHG+) results are caused by weak antibodies, NIH+/AHG- results are usually due to autoantibodies. We found that solid organ transplantation candidates with NIH+/AHG- XM results are repeatedly excluded from allocation of deceased donor organs by the Korean Network for Organ Sharing (KONOS) allocation system. Here, we attempted to demonstrate that these patients do not have donor-specific HLA antibodies (DSAs). Methods: Sera showing NIH+/AHG- results in the analysis of 1,668 KONOS T-cell XM tests were screened for panel reactive antibody (PRA) using a Luminex test. For screen-positive samples, antibody identification was conducted using a Luminex single antigen assay and the presence or absence of class I DSAs was determined. For positive controls, 42 KONOS XM tests showing probable true-positive (NIH-/AHG+ or NIH+/AHG+) results were reviewed for PRA results based on electronic medical records and the presence or absence of DSAs was determined. Results: NIH+/AHG- results were observed in 1.3% (21/1,668) of KONOS XM tests analyzed. Most of these (18/21, 85.7%) were negative for PRA or DSAs. All probable true-positive cases were either positive for DSAs (24/42, 57.1%) or had high PRA (mean, 92% [range; 42%∼100%]), complicating accurate identification of antibody specificities. Conclusions: NIH+/AHG- results are not rare (1.3%) in KONOS XM tests. Most of these results are not due to DSAs, and these patients should not be excluded from organ allocation.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
韩国器官共享交叉配型试验网络中自身抗体引起的t细胞毒性交叉配型假阳性结果
背景:美国国立卫生研究院(NIH)和敏感的抗人球蛋白(AHG)方法被广泛用于t细胞补体依赖性细胞毒性交叉配伍(XM)试验。NIH阴性、AHG阳性(NIH-/AHG+)结果是由弱抗体引起的,而NIH+/AHG-结果通常是由自身抗体引起的。我们发现,具有NIH+/AHG- XM结果的实体器官移植候选人一再被韩国器官共享网络(KONOS)分配系统排除在死者供体器官分配之外。在这里,我们试图证明这些患者没有供体特异性HLA抗体(dsa)。方法:使用Luminex测试筛选1,668例KONOS t细胞XM试验中显示NIH+/AHG-结果的血清,以筛选面板反应性抗体(PRA)。对于筛选阳性样本,使用Luminex单抗原测定法进行抗体鉴定,并确定是否存在I类dsa。对于阳性对照,根据电子病历审查42例显示可能真阳性(NIH-/AHG+或NIH+/AHG+)结果的KONOS XM试验,并确定是否存在dsa。结果:在分析的KONOS XM试验中,有1.3%(21/ 1668)出现NIH+/AHG-结果。多数患者(18/21,85.7%)PRA或dsa阴性。所有可能的真阳性病例要么dsa阳性(24/42,57.1%),要么PRA高(平均,92%[范围;42% ~ 100%]),使抗体特异性的准确鉴定复杂化。结论:NIH+/AHG-结果在KONOS XM检测中并不罕见(1.3%)。这些结果大多不是由于dsa,这些患者不应排除器官分配。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Angiotensin II type 1 receptor antibodies in kidney transplantation Pediatric liver transplantation in Korea: long-term outcomes and allocations A case of Castleman disease that improved after kidney transplantation Donor Specific Antibody Negative Antibody-Mediated Rejection after ABO Incompatible Liver Transplantation Successful Treatment of Invasive Gastric Mucormycosis in a Kidney Transplant Recipient
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1