Toppling statues, affective publics and the lessons of the Black Lives Matter movement

D. Beech, M. Jordan
{"title":"Toppling statues, affective publics and the lessons of the Black Lives Matter movement","authors":"D. Beech, M. Jordan","doi":"10.1386/aps_00045_3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this opening article, we explore how the Black Lives Matter (BLM) movement challenges the traditional norms and conduct of the bourgeois public sphere. Ahmed argues how the White male body is abstracted in order to achieve a universal status (Ahmed) and how his ‘invisibility’ is his power; the socially constructed ‘invisibility’ of whiteness forces those people considered to be of colour to be ‘marked and highly visible’ (Purwar). We assert that this abstracting of whiteness, along with the dominance of rational debate leads to the patriarchal practices of the bourgeois public sphere. Utilizing Papacharissi’s concept of ‘Affective Publics’, we examine the extent to which the online and offline activities of the BLM movement – including the toppling of statues – charge social media with the capacity to act as a fully fledged public sphere. We conclude that the BLM movement exemplifies a mode of public participation that outstrips conventional thinking on the bourgeois public sphere and therefore can be taken as model for radically rethinking what a public sphere ought to be.","PeriodicalId":311280,"journal":{"name":"Art & the Public Sphere","volume":"172 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Art & the Public Sphere","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1386/aps_00045_3","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

In this opening article, we explore how the Black Lives Matter (BLM) movement challenges the traditional norms and conduct of the bourgeois public sphere. Ahmed argues how the White male body is abstracted in order to achieve a universal status (Ahmed) and how his ‘invisibility’ is his power; the socially constructed ‘invisibility’ of whiteness forces those people considered to be of colour to be ‘marked and highly visible’ (Purwar). We assert that this abstracting of whiteness, along with the dominance of rational debate leads to the patriarchal practices of the bourgeois public sphere. Utilizing Papacharissi’s concept of ‘Affective Publics’, we examine the extent to which the online and offline activities of the BLM movement – including the toppling of statues – charge social media with the capacity to act as a fully fledged public sphere. We conclude that the BLM movement exemplifies a mode of public participation that outstrips conventional thinking on the bourgeois public sphere and therefore can be taken as model for radically rethinking what a public sphere ought to be.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
推倒的雕像,有感情的公众,以及黑人的命也是命运动的教训
在这篇开篇文章中,我们探讨了黑人的命也是命(BLM)运动如何挑战资产阶级公共领域的传统规范和行为。Ahmed认为白人男性的身体是如何被抽象出来以获得普遍地位的(Ahmed),以及他的“隐形”是他的力量;社会建构的白人的“隐形”迫使那些被认为是有色人种的人“被标记和高度可见”(Purwar)。我们断言,这种对白人的抽象,以及理性辩论的主导地位,导致了资产阶级公共领域的父权实践。利用Papacharissi的“情感公众”概念,我们考察了BLM运动的线上和线下活动——包括推倒雕像——在多大程度上赋予了社会媒体作为一个成熟的公共领域的能力。我们的结论是,土地管理局运动体现了一种公众参与的模式,这种模式超越了对资产阶级公共领域的传统思维,因此可以被视为从根本上重新思考公共领域应该是什么样子的模式。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Art, politics, pedagogy: Juxtaposing, discomfiting, disrupting The case for creative folklore in pedagogical practice Paying it forward to end period poverty in Aotearoa/New Zealand: Pedagogies and politics of care, community, and academic activism Teaching urban spaces and world politics: Perdido Street Station and pedagogies of production Conflictual sociability? A paradoxical approach to politicized street theatre
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1