COLORADO'S BONUS PLAN FOR AGED PENSIONERS

O. Traylor
{"title":"COLORADO'S BONUS PLAN FOR AGED PENSIONERS","authors":"O. Traylor","doi":"10.1086/bullnattax41787493","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"this question as well as the large issue of post-war fiscal policy. The federal government at once submitted a far-reaching set of proposals of which the focus was not merely revision of Dominion-Provincial relations according to the recommendations of the earlier Royal Commission, but rather maintenance of a high level of employment and income. The provinces were asked to give! up income taxation and succession duties for a term of years in return foi unconditional subsidies which would vary with gross national production. These subsidies were to be more generous than those given under the wartime tax agreements and they were not, as were those recommended by the Royal Commission, to rest explicitly upon fiscal need. The federal government also offered to carry a larger share of the cost of a social security program, and it proposed a coordinated program of counter-cyclical public investment. The conference dispersed to study the federal proposals, reassembling nine months later on April 29, 1946. Despite liberalization of federal payments, no general agreement could be reached chiefly because of the opposition of Ontario and Quebec. The next step came on June 27 when Mr. Ilsley presented his budget to the House of Commons. He then offered to negotiate with individual provinces agreements to run for five years by which an agreeing province would levy (a) no personal income tax, (b) a 5 percent tax, federally collected, on net corporate income, (c) either no succession duties, or if levied, an appropriate reduction in its subsidies. The in lieu subsidies were to be those offered at the last DominionProvincial Conference.10 Agreements on this basis have been signed by several provinces and all may be expected to sign except Ontario and Quebec. The opposition of Ontario rests primarily on economic grounds. The federal plan would lead to a net transfer of income from its residents to other Canadians. The opposition of Quebec rests on cultural and demographic features which make this province oppose centralization.","PeriodicalId":162826,"journal":{"name":"The Bulletin of the National Tax Association","volume":"65 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1947-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Bulletin of the National Tax Association","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1086/bullnattax41787493","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

this question as well as the large issue of post-war fiscal policy. The federal government at once submitted a far-reaching set of proposals of which the focus was not merely revision of Dominion-Provincial relations according to the recommendations of the earlier Royal Commission, but rather maintenance of a high level of employment and income. The provinces were asked to give! up income taxation and succession duties for a term of years in return foi unconditional subsidies which would vary with gross national production. These subsidies were to be more generous than those given under the wartime tax agreements and they were not, as were those recommended by the Royal Commission, to rest explicitly upon fiscal need. The federal government also offered to carry a larger share of the cost of a social security program, and it proposed a coordinated program of counter-cyclical public investment. The conference dispersed to study the federal proposals, reassembling nine months later on April 29, 1946. Despite liberalization of federal payments, no general agreement could be reached chiefly because of the opposition of Ontario and Quebec. The next step came on June 27 when Mr. Ilsley presented his budget to the House of Commons. He then offered to negotiate with individual provinces agreements to run for five years by which an agreeing province would levy (a) no personal income tax, (b) a 5 percent tax, federally collected, on net corporate income, (c) either no succession duties, or if levied, an appropriate reduction in its subsidies. The in lieu subsidies were to be those offered at the last DominionProvincial Conference.10 Agreements on this basis have been signed by several provinces and all may be expected to sign except Ontario and Quebec. The opposition of Ontario rests primarily on economic grounds. The federal plan would lead to a net transfer of income from its residents to other Canadians. The opposition of Quebec rests on cultural and demographic features which make this province oppose centralization.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
科罗拉多州对老年养老金领取者的奖金计划
这个问题以及战后财政政策的大问题。联邦政府立即提出了一套意义深远的建议,其重点不仅是根据早先皇家委员会的建议修改自治领与省的关系,而且是维持高水平的就业和收入。各省都被要求给!在一定期限内提高所得税和继承税,以换取随国民生产总值变化的无条件补贴。这些补贴将比战时税收协议下的补贴更为慷慨,而且不像皇家委员会建议的那样,明确以财政需要为依据。联邦政府还提出承担一项社会保障计划的更大份额成本,并提出了一项反周期公共投资的协调计划。会议散去研究联邦政府的提案,九个月后于1946年4月29日重新召开。尽管放宽了联邦支付,但由于安大略省和魁北克省的反对,未能达成普遍协议。6月27日,伊尔斯利向下议院提交了预算案,迈出了下一步。然后,他提出与各省协商一项为期五年的协议,其中同意的省份将不征收(a)个人所得税,(b)对企业净收入征收5%的联邦税,(c)不征收继承税,或者如果征收,适当减少补贴。代替补贴将是上次自治领省会议上提供的补贴。在此基础上已由几个省签署了协议,除安大略省和魁北克省外,预计所有省都将签署。安大略省的反对主要基于经济方面的理由。这项联邦计划将导致居民收入的净转移给其他加拿大人。魁北克的反对基于文化和人口特征,这使得该省反对中央集权。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
THE PHILADELPHIA INCOME TAX: A SOLUTION TO MUNICIPAL FINANCIAL DIFFICULTIES THE ISSUE OF FEDERAL TAX REDUCTION DURING INFLATION FEDERAL EXCISE TAXATION THE AUSTRALIAN GRANTS-IN-AID SYSTEM CENSUS BUREAU PUBLICATIONS ON GOVERNMENTS
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1