Flow Diagnostics in High Rate Gas Condensate Well Using Distributed Fiber-Optic Sensing and its Validation with Conventional Production Log

Fuad Atakishiyev, Alessandro Delfino, C. Cerrahoglu, Z. Hasanov, I. Yusifov, Anne Wallace, Alberto Mendoza
{"title":"Flow Diagnostics in High Rate Gas Condensate Well Using Distributed Fiber-Optic Sensing and its Validation with Conventional Production Log","authors":"Fuad Atakishiyev, Alessandro Delfino, C. Cerrahoglu, Z. Hasanov, I. Yusifov, Anne Wallace, Alberto Mendoza","doi":"10.2118/205435-ms","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n We introduce a novel Machine Learning (ML) approach for processing distributed fiber-optic sensing (DFOS) data that enables dynamic flow profile monitoring using a fiber-optic e-line cable deployed in a gas condensate well and compare it to a conventional approach. DFOS technology has the potential to provide more efficient and dynamic flow profiles compared to traditional methods, particularly in high rate gas wells where production logs (PL) are recorded at reduced rates to avoid tool lifting.\n Distributed acoustic and temperature sensing (DAS & DTS) data were acquired simultaneously while the well was producing ~70 MMSCF/D gas. Conventional PL data was also acquired under the same condition to validate the flow profiling results obtained from DFOS measurements. This paper describes a novel data processing approach where ML based models for pattern recognition were applied to obtain the signatures of different fluid types. Flow profiling is achieved by applying multiple data models to address three key questions for inflow profiling: (1) which zones are producing? (2) what is the phase? and (3) what is the flow rate?\n A blind test was set up to avoid results contamination. The processing and interpretation of DFOS data and PL data were carried out independently and results were compared only when the work on both datasets was completed. The comparison demonstrates a good match between two measurements for gas inflow profile with an average error of about 1% in relative gas rate allocation along the four producing perforated intervals. Flow profile in a single-phase gas producing well was accurately determined by DFOS data analysis and the liquid production rate was then re-calculated using condensate-gas ratio (CGR) to obtain liquid and gas production rates at standard surface condition. The well was connected to a test separator during the entire acquisition period, and accurate gas, condensate and water production rates were obtained in real-time at surface condition.\n The hybrid processing technique was applied for the first time among our well stock and resulted in accurate gas inflow profiling. To further validate the performance of the presented approach, the authors intend to repeat the test in other high rate gas producing wells, including wells with permanently installed fiber. Multi-disciplinary teamwork involved collaboration between operator and vendor and allowed for efficient operational execution. The result of the risk assessment ensured the selection of the best candidate well ensuring minimum sand production at the optimum production rate, optimization of stationary time for DFOS data acquisition and cable armor erosion model.","PeriodicalId":421935,"journal":{"name":"Day 1 Tue, September 07, 2021","volume":"6 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-09-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Day 1 Tue, September 07, 2021","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2118/205435-ms","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

We introduce a novel Machine Learning (ML) approach for processing distributed fiber-optic sensing (DFOS) data that enables dynamic flow profile monitoring using a fiber-optic e-line cable deployed in a gas condensate well and compare it to a conventional approach. DFOS technology has the potential to provide more efficient and dynamic flow profiles compared to traditional methods, particularly in high rate gas wells where production logs (PL) are recorded at reduced rates to avoid tool lifting. Distributed acoustic and temperature sensing (DAS & DTS) data were acquired simultaneously while the well was producing ~70 MMSCF/D gas. Conventional PL data was also acquired under the same condition to validate the flow profiling results obtained from DFOS measurements. This paper describes a novel data processing approach where ML based models for pattern recognition were applied to obtain the signatures of different fluid types. Flow profiling is achieved by applying multiple data models to address three key questions for inflow profiling: (1) which zones are producing? (2) what is the phase? and (3) what is the flow rate? A blind test was set up to avoid results contamination. The processing and interpretation of DFOS data and PL data were carried out independently and results were compared only when the work on both datasets was completed. The comparison demonstrates a good match between two measurements for gas inflow profile with an average error of about 1% in relative gas rate allocation along the four producing perforated intervals. Flow profile in a single-phase gas producing well was accurately determined by DFOS data analysis and the liquid production rate was then re-calculated using condensate-gas ratio (CGR) to obtain liquid and gas production rates at standard surface condition. The well was connected to a test separator during the entire acquisition period, and accurate gas, condensate and water production rates were obtained in real-time at surface condition. The hybrid processing technique was applied for the first time among our well stock and resulted in accurate gas inflow profiling. To further validate the performance of the presented approach, the authors intend to repeat the test in other high rate gas producing wells, including wells with permanently installed fiber. Multi-disciplinary teamwork involved collaboration between operator and vendor and allowed for efficient operational execution. The result of the risk assessment ensured the selection of the best candidate well ensuring minimum sand production at the optimum production rate, optimization of stationary time for DFOS data acquisition and cable armor erosion model.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
分布式光纤传感在高速率凝析气井中的流量诊断及常规生产测井验证
我们引入了一种新的机器学习(ML)方法来处理分布式光纤传感(DFOS)数据,该方法可以使用部署在凝析气井中的光纤电缆进行动态流量剖面监测,并将其与传统方法进行比较。与传统方法相比,DFOS技术有可能提供更高效、更动态的流动曲线,特别是在高速率气井中,以较低的速率记录生产测井(PL),以避免工具抬起。分布式声学和温度传感(DAS和DTS)数据是在该井产量为70 MMSCF/D时同时采集的。在相同的条件下,还获得了常规的PL数据,以验证从DFOS测量中获得的流动剖面结果。本文描述了一种新的数据处理方法,将基于机器学习的模式识别模型应用于获取不同流体类型的特征。流动剖面是通过应用多种数据模型来解决流入剖面的三个关键问题来实现的:(1)哪些区域在生产?(2)相是什么?(3)流量是多少?为避免结果污染,设置了盲测。DFOS数据和PL数据的处理和解释是独立进行的,只有在两个数据集的工作完成后才对结果进行比较。对比结果表明,两种测量结果吻合良好,在四个生产射孔段的相对含气量分配上平均误差约为1%。通过DFOS数据分析,准确确定了单相产气井的流动剖面,然后利用凝析气比(CGR)重新计算出产液速率,得到标准地面条件下的产液速率和产气速率。在整个采集过程中,该井与测试分离器相连,在地面条件下实时获得准确的气、凝析油和水产量。该混合处理技术首次在我们的井群中应用,并获得了准确的气体流入剖面。为了进一步验证该方法的性能,作者打算在其他高产气井(包括永久安装光纤的井)中重复该测试。多学科团队合作涉及运营商和供应商之间的协作,并允许有效的操作执行。风险评估结果保证了最佳候选井的选择,保证了在最佳产量下最小出砂量,优化了DFOS数据采集的静止时间和电缆装甲侵蚀模型。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Downhole Monitoring of Fractures in a Waterflood Development – Part 1 Flow Diagnostics in High Rate Gas Condensate Well Using Distributed Fiber-Optic Sensing and its Validation with Conventional Production Log Optimizing Wellbore Trajectories for Closed Loop Geothermal Operations A Road Map for Renewable Energy Integration with Subsea Processing Systems Real Time Cloud-Based Automation for Formation Evaluation Optimization, Risk Mitigation and Decarbonization
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1