Steam-Foam Assessment Using Native Cores from the Ratqa Lower Fars RQLF Heavy Oil Reservoir in Kuwait to De-Risk Field-Scale Deployment

M. T. Al-Murayri, A. Hassan, Dawood S. Kamal, G. Batôt, A. Cuenca, Jessica Butron, A. Kantzas, G. Suzanne
{"title":"Steam-Foam Assessment Using Native Cores from the Ratqa Lower Fars RQLF Heavy Oil Reservoir in Kuwait to De-Risk Field-Scale Deployment","authors":"M. T. Al-Murayri, A. Hassan, Dawood S. Kamal, G. Batôt, A. Cuenca, Jessica Butron, A. Kantzas, G. Suzanne","doi":"10.2118/191190-MS","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n Foam has been extensively investigated as a method to improve the mobility control of non-condensable gases in the EOR context. Recently, there has been renewed interest in foam applied to steam injections. However, steam is a condensable gas and thus steam-foam requires special analyses that differ from classical foam assessments. This work presents the coreflood results of a steam-foam process evaluation for the Ratqa Lower Fars (RQLF) heavy oil reservoir in Kuwait.\n Using specifically designed foaming surfactants, coreflood tests in the absence and presence of heavy crude oil are performed in native sandpack cores under RQLF reservoir conditions (220°C; 360 psi). In order to limit steam condensation due to the build-up of the foam pressure, steam has been supplemented with a small amount of non-condensable gas (nitrogen, about 1 - 5 mol.%). Interstitial velocity was decreased from 40 ft/day down to 1 ft/day (CWE). Phase equilibria at the core inlet were estimated based on thermodynamics flash calculations. From these calculations inlet steam quality was varied from 10 to 70 wt.%. In absence of oil, the apparent viscosity of the generated steam-foam is measured between 25 and 50 cP, depending on the interstitial velocity and inlet steam quality. Indeed, beside the classical shear-thickening behaviour observed with the decreasing flow rates, the critical or optimal steam quality is found to be closed to 30 wt.%. Furthermore, even at higher steam quality the foam is still stable and efficient with a viscosity higher than 25 cP. Experiments in the presence of crude oil were carried out under the same conditions in native cores at a steam residual oil saturation of 7% and 13%. These experiments showed that the optimal steam quality is shifted to approximatively 10 wt.%. Furthermore, the foam flow curve shows a shear-thinning behavior that is elaborated upon. Finally, the viscosity in the presence of heavy crude oil of the generated steam-foam is within the range of 7 to 22 cP, depending on the oil saturation and on the injection conditions. Considering the oil viscosity (2 to 3 cP) under the same conditions, this means that the foam effect should translate into efficient improved conformance control of the steam within the reservoir.\n For the first time, an efficient and stable steam-foam is generated in coreflood experiments. The generated foam achieved high apparent viscosities, even in the presence of oil, and this has not been reported in the literature to date. The results presented here are far more than a proof of concept as they bring new evidences regarding steam-foam efficiency and mechanisms with heavy crude oil.","PeriodicalId":415543,"journal":{"name":"Day 2 Tue, June 26, 2018","volume":"160 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-06-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Day 2 Tue, June 26, 2018","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2118/191190-MS","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Foam has been extensively investigated as a method to improve the mobility control of non-condensable gases in the EOR context. Recently, there has been renewed interest in foam applied to steam injections. However, steam is a condensable gas and thus steam-foam requires special analyses that differ from classical foam assessments. This work presents the coreflood results of a steam-foam process evaluation for the Ratqa Lower Fars (RQLF) heavy oil reservoir in Kuwait. Using specifically designed foaming surfactants, coreflood tests in the absence and presence of heavy crude oil are performed in native sandpack cores under RQLF reservoir conditions (220°C; 360 psi). In order to limit steam condensation due to the build-up of the foam pressure, steam has been supplemented with a small amount of non-condensable gas (nitrogen, about 1 - 5 mol.%). Interstitial velocity was decreased from 40 ft/day down to 1 ft/day (CWE). Phase equilibria at the core inlet were estimated based on thermodynamics flash calculations. From these calculations inlet steam quality was varied from 10 to 70 wt.%. In absence of oil, the apparent viscosity of the generated steam-foam is measured between 25 and 50 cP, depending on the interstitial velocity and inlet steam quality. Indeed, beside the classical shear-thickening behaviour observed with the decreasing flow rates, the critical or optimal steam quality is found to be closed to 30 wt.%. Furthermore, even at higher steam quality the foam is still stable and efficient with a viscosity higher than 25 cP. Experiments in the presence of crude oil were carried out under the same conditions in native cores at a steam residual oil saturation of 7% and 13%. These experiments showed that the optimal steam quality is shifted to approximatively 10 wt.%. Furthermore, the foam flow curve shows a shear-thinning behavior that is elaborated upon. Finally, the viscosity in the presence of heavy crude oil of the generated steam-foam is within the range of 7 to 22 cP, depending on the oil saturation and on the injection conditions. Considering the oil viscosity (2 to 3 cP) under the same conditions, this means that the foam effect should translate into efficient improved conformance control of the steam within the reservoir. For the first time, an efficient and stable steam-foam is generated in coreflood experiments. The generated foam achieved high apparent viscosities, even in the presence of oil, and this has not been reported in the literature to date. The results presented here are far more than a proof of concept as they bring new evidences regarding steam-foam efficiency and mechanisms with heavy crude oil.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
利用科威特Ratqa Lower Fars RQLF稠油油藏的原生岩心进行蒸汽泡沫评估,降低油田规模部署的风险
在提高采收率的背景下,泡沫作为一种改善不凝性气体流动性控制的方法已经得到了广泛的研究。最近,人们对泡沫应用于蒸汽注入又产生了新的兴趣。然而,蒸汽是一种可冷凝气体,因此蒸汽泡沫需要与经典泡沫评估不同的特殊分析。本文介绍了科威特Ratqa Lower Fars (RQLF)稠油油藏蒸汽泡沫工艺评价的岩心驱油结果。使用专门设计的发泡表面活性剂,在RQLF油藏条件下(220℃;360 psi)。为了限制由于泡沫压力积聚而产生的蒸汽冷凝,在蒸汽中加入少量不可冷凝气体(氮,约1 - 5 mol.%)。间隙速度从40英尺/天降至1英尺/天(CWE)。根据热力学闪速计算,估算了堆芯入口的相平衡。根据这些计算,进口蒸汽质量从10%到70%不等。在没有油的情况下,根据间隙速度和进口蒸汽质量,所产生的蒸汽泡沫的表观粘度在25到50 cP之间进行测量。事实上,除了随着流量减少而观察到的经典剪切增厚行为外,发现临界或最佳蒸汽质量接近30wt .%。此外,即使在较高的蒸汽质量下,泡沫仍然稳定有效,粘度高于25 cP。在相同条件下,在原生岩心中进行了原油存在的实验,蒸汽残余油饱和度为7%和13%。这些实验表明,最佳蒸汽质量约为10 wt.%。此外,泡沫流动曲线表现出剪切变薄的行为。最后,根据含油饱和度和注入条件的不同,在稠油存在的情况下,蒸汽泡沫的粘度在7到22 cP之间。考虑到相同条件下的油粘度(2 ~ 3cp),这意味着泡沫效应应该转化为有效改善储层内蒸汽的一致性控制。首次在岩心驱油实验中产生了高效稳定的蒸汽泡沫。所产生的泡沫达到了很高的表观粘度,即使在存在油的情况下,这在迄今为止的文献中还没有报道。本文提出的结果不仅仅是一个概念的证明,因为它们为重质原油的蒸汽泡沫效率和机制提供了新的证据。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Optimization under Uncertainty for Reliable Unconventional Play Evaluation. A Case Study in Vaca Muerta Shale Gas Blocks, Argentina Stability Improvement of CO2 Foam for Enhanced Oil Recovery Applications Using Nanoparticles and Viscoelastic Surfactants Effect of Temperature, Phase Change, and Chemical Additive on Wettability Alteration During Steam Applications in Sands and Carbonates Application of the Capacitance Model in Primary Production Period before IOR Implementation Transient and Boundary Dominated Flow Temperature Analysis under Variable Rate Conditions
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1