Do Student Success Courses Actually Help Community College Students Succeed? CCRC Brief. Number 36.

M. Zeidenberg, Davis Jenkins, Juan Carlos Calcagno
{"title":"Do Student Success Courses Actually Help Community College Students Succeed? CCRC Brief. Number 36.","authors":"M. Zeidenberg, Davis Jenkins, Juan Carlos Calcagno","doi":"10.7916/D80K26M6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Many first-time college students arrive on campus unprepared to succeed in college. This is especially the case at community colleges, which pursue an “open door” mission of serving all students, regardless of prior educational background. According to a survey of degree-granting institutions by the National Center for Education Statistics (2003), 42 percent of entering first-time students at public two-year colleges in fall 2000 took at least one remedial course (or one “developmental” course; we use these terms interchangeably), compared to 20 percent of entering students at public four-year institutions. Among recent high school graduates who entered higher education through community colleges in the mid-1990s, over 60 percent took at least one remedial course (authors’ calculations based on the National Education Longitudinal Survey of 1988 [NELS: 88]). Underpreparation is typically viewed in terms of deficiencies in students’ basic academic skills, specifically in those skills integral to the reading, writing, and mathematics subject areas. Community college educators maintain, however, that many entering students are also unprepared in other important ways. It is widely believed that many students have poor study habits and lack clear goals for college and careers. Some experts contend that helping students address these non-academic deficiencies is just as important as helping them acquire basic academic skills through remedial classes, which typically do not address issues such as study skills, goal setting, and the like (Boylan, 2002; Pascarella & Terenzini, 1991). In response to this increasingly acknowledged need, community colleges now offer “student success” courses that teach students how to write notes, take tests, and manage their time; that help students explore their learning styles; and that encourage students to develop plans for college and careers (Derby & Smith, 2004). A wide spectrum of students may find these courses useful. Although such courses are not themselves considered to be remedial, sometimes colleges require that they be taken by students who need academic remediation. Student success courses have certainly become wellestablished. Indeed, several publishers offer textbooks for these courses, in some cases allowing colleges to customize the course material with institution-specific information such as support services available on a given campus. Student success courses, and their effectiveness, are the focus of this Brief. Despite the prevalence of these courses at community colleges, little research has been conducted on their effectiveness. Recently a research team headed by Dr. Patricia Windham at the Florida Department of Education compared the outcomes of students who completed a student success course — which in Florida is known as a “student life skills,” or “SLS,” course — with those of students who did not take or complete such a course (Florida Department of Education, 2006). They found that SLS course completers were more likely than non-completers to achieve one of the following three indicators of success: earning a community college credential, transferring to the state university system, or remaining enrolled in college after five years. Results of this study are shown in Figure 1. Among students who needed at least one remedial course, those who passed an SLS course were more likely to achieve these milestones than were those who did not take or complete an SLS course. The same pattern holds for students who were required to take remedial courses in all three subject areas — students who are generally plagued by high rates of failure. In Florida’s 28 community colleges, SLS courses are open to all students, but some of the colleges require that certain students take them. According to an earlier study (Florida Department of Education, 2005), 13 colleges have no requirement that any particular students take an SLS course; it is, rather, an elective course. Most of the other colleges tie a requirement to enroll in SLS to enrollment in developmental courses, although the rule varies in terms of which, and how many, developmental courses students need to enroll in before they are required to take SLS. One college requires all students NUMBER 36 JUNE 2007 ISSN 1526-2049","PeriodicalId":218750,"journal":{"name":"Community College Research Center, Columbia University","volume":"51 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2007-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"144","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Community College Research Center, Columbia University","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7916/D80K26M6","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 144

Abstract

Many first-time college students arrive on campus unprepared to succeed in college. This is especially the case at community colleges, which pursue an “open door” mission of serving all students, regardless of prior educational background. According to a survey of degree-granting institutions by the National Center for Education Statistics (2003), 42 percent of entering first-time students at public two-year colleges in fall 2000 took at least one remedial course (or one “developmental” course; we use these terms interchangeably), compared to 20 percent of entering students at public four-year institutions. Among recent high school graduates who entered higher education through community colleges in the mid-1990s, over 60 percent took at least one remedial course (authors’ calculations based on the National Education Longitudinal Survey of 1988 [NELS: 88]). Underpreparation is typically viewed in terms of deficiencies in students’ basic academic skills, specifically in those skills integral to the reading, writing, and mathematics subject areas. Community college educators maintain, however, that many entering students are also unprepared in other important ways. It is widely believed that many students have poor study habits and lack clear goals for college and careers. Some experts contend that helping students address these non-academic deficiencies is just as important as helping them acquire basic academic skills through remedial classes, which typically do not address issues such as study skills, goal setting, and the like (Boylan, 2002; Pascarella & Terenzini, 1991). In response to this increasingly acknowledged need, community colleges now offer “student success” courses that teach students how to write notes, take tests, and manage their time; that help students explore their learning styles; and that encourage students to develop plans for college and careers (Derby & Smith, 2004). A wide spectrum of students may find these courses useful. Although such courses are not themselves considered to be remedial, sometimes colleges require that they be taken by students who need academic remediation. Student success courses have certainly become wellestablished. Indeed, several publishers offer textbooks for these courses, in some cases allowing colleges to customize the course material with institution-specific information such as support services available on a given campus. Student success courses, and their effectiveness, are the focus of this Brief. Despite the prevalence of these courses at community colleges, little research has been conducted on their effectiveness. Recently a research team headed by Dr. Patricia Windham at the Florida Department of Education compared the outcomes of students who completed a student success course — which in Florida is known as a “student life skills,” or “SLS,” course — with those of students who did not take or complete such a course (Florida Department of Education, 2006). They found that SLS course completers were more likely than non-completers to achieve one of the following three indicators of success: earning a community college credential, transferring to the state university system, or remaining enrolled in college after five years. Results of this study are shown in Figure 1. Among students who needed at least one remedial course, those who passed an SLS course were more likely to achieve these milestones than were those who did not take or complete an SLS course. The same pattern holds for students who were required to take remedial courses in all three subject areas — students who are generally plagued by high rates of failure. In Florida’s 28 community colleges, SLS courses are open to all students, but some of the colleges require that certain students take them. According to an earlier study (Florida Department of Education, 2005), 13 colleges have no requirement that any particular students take an SLS course; it is, rather, an elective course. Most of the other colleges tie a requirement to enroll in SLS to enrollment in developmental courses, although the rule varies in terms of which, and how many, developmental courses students need to enroll in before they are required to take SLS. One college requires all students NUMBER 36 JUNE 2007 ISSN 1526-2049
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
学生成功课程真的能帮助社区大学学生成功吗?CCRC简短。36号。
许多第一次上大学的学生没有准备好在大学里取得成功。社区大学尤其如此,因为社区大学奉行“门户开放”的使命,为所有学生提供服务,无论他们之前的教育背景如何。根据国家教育统计中心(2003)对学位授予机构的调查,2000年秋季,42%的公立两年制大学新生至少选修了一门补习课程(或一门“发展性”课程;我们交替使用这两个术语),相比之下,公立四年制大学的新生中有20%是这样。在20世纪90年代中期通过社区大学进入高等教育的高中毕业生中,超过60%的人至少参加了一门补习课程(作者的计算基于1988年全国教育纵向调查[NELS: 88])。准备不足通常被认为是学生基本学术技能的不足,特别是在阅读、写作和数学学科领域不可或缺的技能方面。然而,社区大学的教育工作者坚持认为,许多入学的学生在其他重要方面也没有做好准备。人们普遍认为,许多学生有不良的学习习惯,对大学和职业缺乏明确的目标。一些专家认为,帮助学生解决这些非学术缺陷与通过辅导班帮助他们获得基本的学术技能同样重要,辅导班通常不解决学习技巧、目标设定等问题(Boylan, 2002;Pascarella & Terenzini, 1991)。为了回应这种日益被承认的需求,社区大学现在开设了“学生成功”课程,教学生如何写笔记、参加考试和管理时间;帮助学生探索自己的学习方式;并鼓励学生制定大学和职业规划(Derby & Smith, 2004)。广泛的学生可能会发现这些课程很有用。虽然这些课程本身不被认为是补课,但有时大学会要求需要补课的学生选修这些课程。学生成功课程当然已经建立起来了。事实上,一些出版商为这些课程提供教科书,在某些情况下,允许大学根据特定机构的信息定制课程材料,例如特定校园的支持服务。学生成功课程及其有效性是本文的重点。尽管这些课程在社区大学很普遍,但对其有效性的研究却很少。最近,佛罗里达教育部帕特里夏·温德姆博士领导的一个研究小组比较了完成学生成功课程(在佛罗里达被称为“学生生活技能”或“SLS”课程)的学生与没有参加或完成这类课程的学生的结果(佛罗里达教育部,2006年)。他们发现,完成SLS课程的学生比未完成课程的学生更有可能达到以下三个成功指标之一:获得社区学院证书,转入州立大学系统,或在五年后继续在大学就读。本研究结果如图1所示。在需要至少一门补习课程的学生中,那些通过SLS课程的学生比那些没有参加或完成SLS课程的学生更有可能达到这些里程碑。同样的模式也适用于那些被要求参加所有三个学科领域的补习课程的学生——这些学生通常被高失败率所困扰。在佛罗里达州的28所社区学院中,SLS课程对所有学生开放,但有些学院要求某些学生选修这些课程。根据一项较早的研究(Florida Department of Education, 2005), 13所大学没有要求任何特定的学生参加SLS课程;更确切地说,这是一门选修课。大多数其他学院都将参加SLS的要求与参加发展课程的要求联系在一起,尽管在要求学生参加SLS之前需要参加哪些和多少发展课程方面,规则有所不同。一个学院要求所有学生编号36 2007年6月ISSN 1526-2049
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Redefining Full-Time in College: Evidence on 15-Credit Strategies A Growing Culture of Evidence? Findings From a Survey on Data Use at Achieving the Dream Colleges in Washington State Characterizing the Effectiveness of Developmental Education: A Response to Recent Criticism Acceleration Through a Holistic Support Model: An Implementation and Outcomes Analysis of FastStart@CCD Adaptability to Online Learning: Differences across Types of Students and Academic Subject Areas. CCRC Working Paper No. 54.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1