Shear bond strength of ceramic brackets bonded to glazed lithium disilicate using different bonding protocols

Aly Aboushady, A. Zaher, E. Abdullah
{"title":"Shear bond strength of ceramic brackets bonded to glazed lithium disilicate using different bonding protocols","authors":"Aly Aboushady, A. Zaher, E. Abdullah","doi":"10.21608/eos.2021.79240.1018","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objectives: To evaluate the shear bond strength (SBS) of ceramic brackets to lithium disilicate using different bonding protocols. Materials and methods: Forty five lithium disilicate discs were embedded into acrylic resin. and randomly assigned to three equal groups (n=15), according to bonding protocol into: (A)Air abrasion with 50μm aluminum oxide particles + Assure Plus, (B) air abrasion with 50μm aluminum oxide particles + silane + Assure Plus (C) air abrasion with 50μm aluminum oxide particles + hydrofluoric acid etching + silane + Transbond XT Primer. Ceramic brackets were then bonded to the lithium disilicate discs using light curecomposite resin. Following thermocycling (500 cycles, 5° 55° C), shear bond strength(SBS) testing was performed with a universal testing machine. After bracket debonding Failure mode and Adhesive Remnant Index were assessed under a stereomicroscope. Results: No significant differences were found among the three groups regarding SBS, Group B showed the highest SBS values. Most specimens in Group B and Group C showed a failure at the bracket adhesive interface. Specimens in Group A showed a mixed cohesive-adhesive failure pattern Conclusion: All 3 groups exhibited shear bond strengths within the clinically acceptable level, samples recieving Air abrasion + Assure plus only displayed better debonding characteristic.","PeriodicalId":305086,"journal":{"name":"Egyptian Orthodontic Journal","volume":"74 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Egyptian Orthodontic Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21608/eos.2021.79240.1018","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Objectives: To evaluate the shear bond strength (SBS) of ceramic brackets to lithium disilicate using different bonding protocols. Materials and methods: Forty five lithium disilicate discs were embedded into acrylic resin. and randomly assigned to three equal groups (n=15), according to bonding protocol into: (A)Air abrasion with 50μm aluminum oxide particles + Assure Plus, (B) air abrasion with 50μm aluminum oxide particles + silane + Assure Plus (C) air abrasion with 50μm aluminum oxide particles + hydrofluoric acid etching + silane + Transbond XT Primer. Ceramic brackets were then bonded to the lithium disilicate discs using light curecomposite resin. Following thermocycling (500 cycles, 5° 55° C), shear bond strength(SBS) testing was performed with a universal testing machine. After bracket debonding Failure mode and Adhesive Remnant Index were assessed under a stereomicroscope. Results: No significant differences were found among the three groups regarding SBS, Group B showed the highest SBS values. Most specimens in Group B and Group C showed a failure at the bracket adhesive interface. Specimens in Group A showed a mixed cohesive-adhesive failure pattern Conclusion: All 3 groups exhibited shear bond strengths within the clinically acceptable level, samples recieving Air abrasion + Assure plus only displayed better debonding characteristic.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
陶瓷支架与釉面二硅酸锂不同粘结方式的剪切粘结强度
目的:评价不同粘接方式下陶瓷支架与二硅酸锂的剪切粘接强度。材料与方法:将45个二硅酸锂片嵌入丙烯酸树脂中。随机分为三组(n=15),根据键合方案分为:(A) 50μm氧化铝颗粒空气磨损+ Assure Plus, (B) 50μm氧化铝颗粒空气磨损+硅烷+ Assure Plus (C) 50μm氧化铝颗粒空气磨损+氢氟酸蚀刻+硅烷+跨键XT底漆。然后使用光固化复合树脂将陶瓷支架粘合到二硅酸锂圆盘上。热循环(500次,5°55°C)后,在通用试验机上进行剪切粘结强度(SBS)测试。在体视显微镜下观察支架脱粘后的破坏模式和粘结残余指数。结果:三组间SBS值无显著性差异,B组SBS值最高。B组和C组大部分试件在支架粘结界面处出现破坏。结论:3组试样的剪切结合强度均在临床可接受的水平内,Air abrasion + Assure + only试样表现出较好的脱粘特性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Comparison Of Different Imaging Software For Measuring Volume Of The Maxillary Sinus Splint-Supported Forsus Fatigue Resistant Device Versus Class II Intermaxillary elastics For The Correction Of Class II Malocclusion ; A Retrospective Study Effect Of White Spot Lesion Pretreatment With Silver Diamine Fluoride Compared To Diode Laser On The Shear Bond Strength Of Orthodontic Brackets. An In-Vitro Study Association Of Soft Tissue Facial Form & Dental Arch Form: A Cross Sectional Comparative Study Association Of Molar Angulation With Anterior Crowding And Dental Inclinations
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1