An Experiment on Process Model Understandability Using Textual Work Instructions and BPMN Models

R. D. Rodrigues, M. Barros, K. Revoredo, L. Azevedo, H. Leopold
{"title":"An Experiment on Process Model Understandability Using Textual Work Instructions and BPMN Models","authors":"R. D. Rodrigues, M. Barros, K. Revoredo, L. Azevedo, H. Leopold","doi":"10.1109/SBES.2015.12","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"It is widely accepted that presenting data in the form of pictures or models can enhance comprehension, decision making and communication of the underlying information. However, there are few systematic studies that examine whether graphical models are more effective than other representation (such as textual descriptions). Process models provide an abstract graphical view of organizational procedures by reducing the complex reality of the work performed by a company to its most important activities. Such models are useful to train new employees, to document and allow improving organizational procedures and policies. This paper describes an experiment to address if there are significant differences in terms of process understand ability depending on whether textual work instructions or process models are used to represent a business process. We compared a control group of subjects that received textual work instructions to a second group, which received process models, in terms of their ability to understand the process. We found empirical support that using textual work instructions or process models do not influence process understand ability for non-expert users but do influence for experienced users.","PeriodicalId":329313,"journal":{"name":"2015 29th Brazilian Symposium on Software Engineering","volume":"5 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-09-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"20","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2015 29th Brazilian Symposium on Software Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/SBES.2015.12","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 20

Abstract

It is widely accepted that presenting data in the form of pictures or models can enhance comprehension, decision making and communication of the underlying information. However, there are few systematic studies that examine whether graphical models are more effective than other representation (such as textual descriptions). Process models provide an abstract graphical view of organizational procedures by reducing the complex reality of the work performed by a company to its most important activities. Such models are useful to train new employees, to document and allow improving organizational procedures and policies. This paper describes an experiment to address if there are significant differences in terms of process understand ability depending on whether textual work instructions or process models are used to represent a business process. We compared a control group of subjects that received textual work instructions to a second group, which received process models, in terms of their ability to understand the process. We found empirical support that using textual work instructions or process models do not influence process understand ability for non-expert users but do influence for experienced users.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
基于文本工作指令和BPMN模型的流程模型可理解性实验
人们普遍认为,以图片或模型的形式呈现数据可以增强对底层信息的理解、决策和交流。然而,很少有系统的研究检查图形模型是否比其他表示(如文本描述)更有效。过程模型通过将公司执行的工作的复杂现实简化为其最重要的活动,提供了组织过程的抽象图形化视图。这些模型对于培训新员工、记录和改进组织程序和政策都很有用。本文描述了一个实验,以解决是否在过程理解能力方面存在显著差异,这取决于是否使用文本工作指令或过程模型来表示业务过程。我们比较了一组接受文本工作指导的控制组和另一组接受过程模型的控制组,就他们理解过程的能力而言。我们发现经验支持,使用文本工作说明或过程模型不影响非专业用户的过程理解能力,但对有经验的用户有影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
A Bayesian Network Model to Assess Agile Teams' Teamwork Quality Evaluating Collaborative Practices in Acquiring Programming Skills: Findings of a Controlled Experiment A Method to Derive Metric Thresholds for Software Product Lines An Experiment on Process Model Understandability Using Textual Work Instructions and BPMN Models Influence of the Review of Executed Activities Utilizing Planning Poker
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1