The Effectiveness of Community-Based Interventions in Improving Activities of Daily Living and Quality of Life Outcomes in Persons Living with Stroke: a Systematic Review

Raymond M. Tosoc, R. Lazaro
{"title":"The Effectiveness of Community-Based Interventions in Improving Activities of Daily Living and Quality of Life Outcomes in Persons Living with Stroke: a Systematic Review","authors":"Raymond M. Tosoc, R. Lazaro","doi":"10.47985/dcidj.503","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose: Despite the growth of literature regarding community-based interventions (CBI) in low-to middle-income and high-income countries, its effectiveness in improving outcomes related to activities of daily living (ADL) and quality of life (QOL) in people with stroke is inconclusive. This systematic review compared the effectiveness of community-based interventions with the usual or hospital-based treatments in improving ADL and QOL outcomes in this population. Method: Four databases were systematically searched from inception until December 31, 2020, for relevant experimental studies from high-income and low-to middle-income countries that compared CBI with the usual/hospital rehabilitation on outcomes related to ADLs and QOL in clients with stroke. Results: All the 10 experimental studies that were included came from high-income countries (Italy, United Kingdom, South Korea, Canada, and Australia), involving 1575 participants (806 males, 656 females, 113 not classified) with age range from 22-103 years. Seven articles measured ADL performance, and 10 measured QOL. Results indicated that CBI generally demonstrates improvement in ADL and QOL values similar to usual or hospital-based care. There was wide variability in the interventions described and the outcome measures used for both groups. Risk of bias assessment revealed issues with randomisation, blinding and follow-up. Stroke-specific baseline characteristics such as length of time since diagnosis and laterality varied considerably in all of the studies.","PeriodicalId":127712,"journal":{"name":"Disability, CBR & Inclusive Development","volume":"283 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Disability, CBR & Inclusive Development","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.47985/dcidj.503","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: Despite the growth of literature regarding community-based interventions (CBI) in low-to middle-income and high-income countries, its effectiveness in improving outcomes related to activities of daily living (ADL) and quality of life (QOL) in people with stroke is inconclusive. This systematic review compared the effectiveness of community-based interventions with the usual or hospital-based treatments in improving ADL and QOL outcomes in this population. Method: Four databases were systematically searched from inception until December 31, 2020, for relevant experimental studies from high-income and low-to middle-income countries that compared CBI with the usual/hospital rehabilitation on outcomes related to ADLs and QOL in clients with stroke. Results: All the 10 experimental studies that were included came from high-income countries (Italy, United Kingdom, South Korea, Canada, and Australia), involving 1575 participants (806 males, 656 females, 113 not classified) with age range from 22-103 years. Seven articles measured ADL performance, and 10 measured QOL. Results indicated that CBI generally demonstrates improvement in ADL and QOL values similar to usual or hospital-based care. There was wide variability in the interventions described and the outcome measures used for both groups. Risk of bias assessment revealed issues with randomisation, blinding and follow-up. Stroke-specific baseline characteristics such as length of time since diagnosis and laterality varied considerably in all of the studies.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
基于社区的干预措施在改善中风患者日常生活活动和生活质量方面的有效性:一项系统综述
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Appropriate Screen Time Use to Prevent Speech and Language Delay in Toddlers during the Covid-19 Pandemic: a Brief Report Implementation of the United Nations Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities in Africa: a Scoping Review International Continuing Education for Rehabilitation Workers in Honduras: a Pre-test Post-test Evaluation The Effectiveness of Community-Based Interventions in Improving Activities of Daily Living and Quality of Life Outcomes in Persons Living with Stroke: a Systematic Review Extra-Institutional Factors Limiting Access to Rehabilitation Services for Children with Cerebral Palsy: Perspectives of Caregivers in Marsabit County, Kenya
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1