The influence of the European Public Prosecutor’s Office on French criminal law

Maria Slimani
{"title":"The influence of the European Public Prosecutor’s Office on French criminal law","authors":"Maria Slimani","doi":"10.1177/20322844231179866","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The Regulation of 12 October 2017 establishing the EPPO was adopted by 22 Member States and entered into force on 1 June 2021. Being a considerable step towards a more integrated European Union, this new Community body sends a strong message as regards the sovereignty of the Member States. Indeed, it has imposed a transfer of power from the states to the EU, even though the European Delegated Prosecutors are the same magistrates than the national prosecutors who were already exercising their functions under national law. Moreover, as there is no criminal court at the EU level, offenders are prosecuted in front of the Member States’ courts. It is precisely because prosecutions are carried out at national level that the creation of EPPO has directly imposed changes in national criminal law. Therefore, more than a year after its establishment, it is interesting to look at the changes in French criminal law imposed by the creation of the EPPO. Beyond the changes brought about by the law, this article also looks at the challenges involved in the creation of this body, in that it identifies difficulties which urgently need to be reflected upon before considering any extension of the EPPO. Indeed, a reflection is necessary on the protection of the rights of the defense in the procedures carried out by this body as well as on the role of the judge considering the disappearance of the investigating judges and especially the problematic relating to the French prosecutor' status.","PeriodicalId":448100,"journal":{"name":"New Journal of European Criminal Law","volume":"94 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"New Journal of European Criminal Law","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/20322844231179866","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

The Regulation of 12 October 2017 establishing the EPPO was adopted by 22 Member States and entered into force on 1 June 2021. Being a considerable step towards a more integrated European Union, this new Community body sends a strong message as regards the sovereignty of the Member States. Indeed, it has imposed a transfer of power from the states to the EU, even though the European Delegated Prosecutors are the same magistrates than the national prosecutors who were already exercising their functions under national law. Moreover, as there is no criminal court at the EU level, offenders are prosecuted in front of the Member States’ courts. It is precisely because prosecutions are carried out at national level that the creation of EPPO has directly imposed changes in national criminal law. Therefore, more than a year after its establishment, it is interesting to look at the changes in French criminal law imposed by the creation of the EPPO. Beyond the changes brought about by the law, this article also looks at the challenges involved in the creation of this body, in that it identifies difficulties which urgently need to be reflected upon before considering any extension of the EPPO. Indeed, a reflection is necessary on the protection of the rights of the defense in the procedures carried out by this body as well as on the role of the judge considering the disappearance of the investigating judges and especially the problematic relating to the French prosecutor' status.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
欧洲检察官办公室对法国刑法的影响
2017年10月12日,22个成员国通过了建立EPPO的法规,并于2021年6月1日生效。作为朝着更加一体化的欧洲联盟迈出的重要一步,这个新的共同体机构发出了关于成员国主权的强烈信息。事实上,它已经将权力从国家转移到欧盟,尽管欧洲授权检察官与已经根据国家法律行使其职能的国家检察官是相同的地方法官。此外,由于欧盟一级没有刑事法院,违法者在成员国的法院前被起诉。正是因为检控是在国家一级进行的,所以EPPO的成立直接改变了国家刑法。因此,在成立一年多后,看看EPPO的成立给法国刑法带来的变化是很有趣的。除了法律带来的变化之外,本文还探讨了创建该机构所涉及的挑战,因为它确定了在考虑延长EPPO之前迫切需要反思的困难。的确,考虑到调查法官的失踪,特别是与法国检察官地位有关的问题,有必要反思在本机构所执行的程序中保护辩护人权利的问题,以及法官的作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Regulation (EU) 2018/1805: Mutual recognition of freezing and confiscation orders between efficiency and safeguards. “Proceedings in criminal matters” and non-conviction based confiscation Reforming EU Criminal Law on the Facilitation of Unauthorised Entry: The new Commission proposal in the light of the Kinshasa litigation Independence of the European Public Prosecutor’s Office in the context of the appointment procedures The judgment of the CJEU in Inspektor (Purposes of the processing of personal data – criminal investigations) of 8 December 2022 and the concept of further processing under the Law Enforcement Directive Editorial: A trialogue on regulating data-driven criminal procedure
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1