{"title":"Anarcha’s Science of the Flesh: Towards an Afropessimist Theory of Science","authors":"J. Gillespie","doi":"10.28968/cftt.v8i1.35229","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This essay re-examines the life of the three enslaved Black “women” Anarcha, Lucy and Betsy at the hands of the acclaimed “Father of Modern Gynecology” J. Marion Sims through the lens of Afropessimism as a means of developing a new analytics of seeing modern scientific development. Through a critical Black studies engagement with the work of Bruno Latour and Steve Woolgar, the paper sets out to explain and expand the concept of ‘primitive accreditation’ as it relates to the foundational narratives and performances of violence constitutive of the modern scientific conceptual economy. Through paradigmatic analysis, the essay aims to antagonize the ease in which anti-Blackness coheres bio-centric notions of gender, sexuality, and humanity as well as suggest that science studies as a field has not yet wrestled with the gender/genre question of Blackness as a problem for the axioms of thought and being.","PeriodicalId":316008,"journal":{"name":"Catalyst: Feminism, Theory, Technoscience","volume":"18 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-04-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Catalyst: Feminism, Theory, Technoscience","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.28968/cftt.v8i1.35229","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
Abstract
This essay re-examines the life of the three enslaved Black “women” Anarcha, Lucy and Betsy at the hands of the acclaimed “Father of Modern Gynecology” J. Marion Sims through the lens of Afropessimism as a means of developing a new analytics of seeing modern scientific development. Through a critical Black studies engagement with the work of Bruno Latour and Steve Woolgar, the paper sets out to explain and expand the concept of ‘primitive accreditation’ as it relates to the foundational narratives and performances of violence constitutive of the modern scientific conceptual economy. Through paradigmatic analysis, the essay aims to antagonize the ease in which anti-Blackness coheres bio-centric notions of gender, sexuality, and humanity as well as suggest that science studies as a field has not yet wrestled with the gender/genre question of Blackness as a problem for the axioms of thought and being.
本文通过非洲悲观主义的视角,重新审视了“现代妇科之父”马里昂·西姆斯(J. Marion Sims)手中三个被奴役的黑人“女性”安那卡、露西和贝特西的生活,并以此作为一种看待现代科学发展的新分析方法。通过对布鲁诺·拉图尔(Bruno Latour)和史蒂夫·伍尔加(Steve Woolgar)的作品进行批判性的黑人研究,本文开始解释和扩展“原始认可”的概念,因为它与构成现代科学概念经济的暴力的基本叙述和表现有关。通过范式分析,本文旨在对抗反黑性将性别、性和人性等生物中心概念凝聚在一起的轻松,并表明科学研究作为一个领域尚未将黑性的性别/类型问题作为思想和存在公理的问题进行斗争。