New Essays on Human Understanding

M. Bolton
{"title":"New Essays on Human Understanding","authors":"M. Bolton","doi":"10.1093/oso/9780198844983.003.0008","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n New Essays explicates Leibniz’s doctrines in response to John Locke’s Essay. The Preface anticipates the most important disagreements. The body of the work is a dialogue between an admirer of Locke, who retells the Essay and his friend who is impressed with Leibniz’s system. They compare views under somewhat artificial rules, with the result that many of Locke’s doctrines discredited in favour of Leibniz’s. I argue that these results have modest but legitimate rational ground. New Essays is tailored to readers influenced by Locke, stressing the inseparable connection between sense perception and intellect. It maintains in detail that the nature of substances is best understood by considering them as concrete individuals that are metaphysically complete down to their spatial and temporal relations to everything in the universe. However, New Essays also contains a wealth of philosophical views regarding language, logic, mathematics, physics, morals, persons, society, history, and more.","PeriodicalId":129475,"journal":{"name":"Leibniz's Key Philosophical Writings","volume":"242 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-10-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Leibniz's Key Philosophical Writings","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198844983.003.0008","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

New Essays explicates Leibniz’s doctrines in response to John Locke’s Essay. The Preface anticipates the most important disagreements. The body of the work is a dialogue between an admirer of Locke, who retells the Essay and his friend who is impressed with Leibniz’s system. They compare views under somewhat artificial rules, with the result that many of Locke’s doctrines discredited in favour of Leibniz’s. I argue that these results have modest but legitimate rational ground. New Essays is tailored to readers influenced by Locke, stressing the inseparable connection between sense perception and intellect. It maintains in detail that the nature of substances is best understood by considering them as concrete individuals that are metaphysically complete down to their spatial and temporal relations to everything in the universe. However, New Essays also contains a wealth of philosophical views regarding language, logic, mathematics, physics, morals, persons, society, history, and more.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
《人类理解新论文集
《新随笔》解释了莱布尼茨的学说,以回应约翰·洛克的随笔。前言预料到了最重要的分歧。这部作品的主体是洛克的崇拜者之间的对话,他重述了《随笔》他的朋友对莱布尼茨的体系印象深刻。他们在一些人为的规则下比较观点,结果洛克的许多学说被莱布尼茨的学说所推翻。我认为,这些结果有适度但合理的理性依据。《新随笔》是为受洛克影响的读者量身定做的,强调感官与智力之间不可分割的联系。它详细地认为,要理解物质的本质,最好将它们视为具体的个体,它们在形而上学上是完整的,直到它们与宇宙中一切事物的空间和时间关系。然而,《新散文》也包含了丰富的哲学观点,涉及语言、逻辑、数学、物理、道德、人、社会、历史等方面。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The Theodicy New Essays on Human Understanding “Confessio philosophi” The “Monadology” The Correspondence with Clarke
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1