Clinical outcomes of critically ill infants requiring interhospital transport to a paediatric tertiary centre in Hong Kong

Karen Ka Yan Leung, So Lee, M. Wong, W. Wong, T. Yung
{"title":"Clinical outcomes of critically ill infants requiring interhospital transport to a paediatric tertiary centre in Hong Kong","authors":"Karen Ka Yan Leung, So Lee, M. Wong, W. Wong, T. Yung","doi":"10.4103/prcm.prcm_6_19","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Specialised transport teams are associated with fewer complications during interhospital transport. Such teams are currently unavailable in Hong Kong. The aim of this study was to review the clinical outcomes of critically ill infants requiring interhospital transport in Hong Kong. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed the characteristics and clinical outcomes of all infants transported from the neonatal units of regional or private hospitals into the neonatal or cardiac intensive care unit (ICU) of Queen Mary Hospital, a tertiary-wide academic centre in Hong Kong from 1st August 2013 to 31st July 2016. Results: A total of 256 infants with a mean gestational age of 31.7 ± 5.5 weeks and birth weight of 1732 ± 1007 g were included in the study. While 143 (55.9%) patients were intubated during transport, there was no documentation of close monitoring of physiological parameters for 91.4% of the patients. Close to half of the patients (44.1%) had complications on admission and 23.4% required significant interventions immediately after the transfer. The median length of stay in the ICU was 3.3 (range: 0.5–342.6) days. Five patients died of non-transport-related causes within 7 days of admission. Multiple logistic regression analysis showed that intubated patient (P = 0.001) or patient requiring inotropic support during transport (P = 0.027) were more likely to develop complications. Higher birth weight (P = 0.022) and younger chronological age at transfer (P = 0.030) were also significant risk factors for complications. Conclusions: Complications and interventions are considerable during interhospital neonatal transport in Hong Kong. The complication rate was higher than medical infrastructures that provided a specialised team for this process. Documentation during transport was inadequate.","PeriodicalId":273845,"journal":{"name":"Pediatric Respirology and Critical Care Medicine","volume":"8 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"10","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pediatric Respirology and Critical Care Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/prcm.prcm_6_19","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 10

Abstract

Background: Specialised transport teams are associated with fewer complications during interhospital transport. Such teams are currently unavailable in Hong Kong. The aim of this study was to review the clinical outcomes of critically ill infants requiring interhospital transport in Hong Kong. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed the characteristics and clinical outcomes of all infants transported from the neonatal units of regional or private hospitals into the neonatal or cardiac intensive care unit (ICU) of Queen Mary Hospital, a tertiary-wide academic centre in Hong Kong from 1st August 2013 to 31st July 2016. Results: A total of 256 infants with a mean gestational age of 31.7 ± 5.5 weeks and birth weight of 1732 ± 1007 g were included in the study. While 143 (55.9%) patients were intubated during transport, there was no documentation of close monitoring of physiological parameters for 91.4% of the patients. Close to half of the patients (44.1%) had complications on admission and 23.4% required significant interventions immediately after the transfer. The median length of stay in the ICU was 3.3 (range: 0.5–342.6) days. Five patients died of non-transport-related causes within 7 days of admission. Multiple logistic regression analysis showed that intubated patient (P = 0.001) or patient requiring inotropic support during transport (P = 0.027) were more likely to develop complications. Higher birth weight (P = 0.022) and younger chronological age at transfer (P = 0.030) were also significant risk factors for complications. Conclusions: Complications and interventions are considerable during interhospital neonatal transport in Hong Kong. The complication rate was higher than medical infrastructures that provided a specialised team for this process. Documentation during transport was inadequate.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
需要在医院间转送至香港第三儿科中心的危重婴儿的临床结果
背景:专门的运输团队在医院间运输中并发症较少。香港目前没有这样的团队。本研究的目的是回顾香港需要医院间转运的危重婴儿的临床结果。方法:我们回顾性分析了2013年8月1日至2016年7月31日期间从地区或私立医院新生儿病房转至玛丽医院新生儿或心脏重症监护室(ICU)的所有婴儿的特征和临床结果。玛丽医院是香港的一家三级学术中心。结果:共纳入256例婴儿,平均胎龄31.7±5.5周,出生体重1732±1007 g。143例(55.9%)患者在转运过程中插管,91.4%的患者没有密切监测生理参数的记录。接近一半的患者(44.1%)在入院时出现并发症,23.4%的患者在转院后立即需要进行重大干预。ICU的中位住院时间为3.3天(范围:0.5-342.6天)。5例患者在入院7天内死于非运输相关原因。多元logistic回归分析显示,插管患者(P = 0.001)或运输过程中需要肌力支持的患者(P = 0.027)更容易发生并发症。较高的出生体重(P = 0.022)和较年轻的移植时实足年龄(P = 0.030)也是发生并发症的重要危险因素。结论:香港新生儿院间转运的并发症和干预措施相当多。并发症发生率高于为这一过程提供专门小组的医疗基础设施。运输过程中的文件不充分。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The Asian pediatric respirology medicine: A vibrant field Epidemiology and risk factors of pediatric pneumonia in a tertiary center in Taiwan Failed intubation in a COVID-positive syndromic neonate Pneumomediastinum following immunization of BioNTech COVID-19 vaccine: A coincidence? Virus infection and severe asthma exacerbations: A cross-sectional study in Children’s Hospital 1, Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1