The effect of grass leaf height on the impact behaviour of natural turf sports field surfaces

M. Caple, I. James, M. Bartlett
{"title":"The effect of grass leaf height on the impact behaviour of natural turf sports field surfaces","authors":"M. Caple, I. James, M. Bartlett","doi":"10.1080/19346182.2012.663537","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The effect of three grass leaf height treatments (50 mm, 25 mm, < 1 mm) of two sports field rootzones (clay loam, sand) was assessed under controlled conditions using the 0.5 kg and 2.25 kg Clegg Impact Soil Testers (CIST) and the Dynamic Surface Tester (DST) device. Results were dependent upon the test device, impact energy, and drop number of the impact. The presence of grass was shown to be more important than specific grass heights in regulating impact behaviour, with no differences detected between 50 mm and 25 mm treatments. Peak deceleration was reduced (P < 0.05) by the presence of grass (50 mm and 25 mm treatments) for drop one, but not drop three of the 0.5 kg CIST missile, indicating grass leaves absorb some impact energy on lower energy single impacts but not when leaves are flattened under repeated loading. There was no difference in peak deceleration of the higher energy 2.25 kg CIST among leaf treatments for first drop, but was significantly lower (P < 0.05) for third drop on the < 1 mm treatment where the soil exhibited greater (P < 0.05) plastic displacement. Surface loading rate and energy absorption did not differ across treatments under athlete-specific impact stresses measured with the DST, suggesting grass leaves may not affect athlete impacts. Greater consideration is required for future impact testing to assess surfaces to specific impacts that occur in game situations through the use of appropriate test devices.","PeriodicalId":237335,"journal":{"name":"Sports Technology","volume":"318 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2011-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"7","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sports Technology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/19346182.2012.663537","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7

Abstract

The effect of three grass leaf height treatments (50 mm, 25 mm, < 1 mm) of two sports field rootzones (clay loam, sand) was assessed under controlled conditions using the 0.5 kg and 2.25 kg Clegg Impact Soil Testers (CIST) and the Dynamic Surface Tester (DST) device. Results were dependent upon the test device, impact energy, and drop number of the impact. The presence of grass was shown to be more important than specific grass heights in regulating impact behaviour, with no differences detected between 50 mm and 25 mm treatments. Peak deceleration was reduced (P < 0.05) by the presence of grass (50 mm and 25 mm treatments) for drop one, but not drop three of the 0.5 kg CIST missile, indicating grass leaves absorb some impact energy on lower energy single impacts but not when leaves are flattened under repeated loading. There was no difference in peak deceleration of the higher energy 2.25 kg CIST among leaf treatments for first drop, but was significantly lower (P < 0.05) for third drop on the < 1 mm treatment where the soil exhibited greater (P < 0.05) plastic displacement. Surface loading rate and energy absorption did not differ across treatments under athlete-specific impact stresses measured with the DST, suggesting grass leaves may not affect athlete impacts. Greater consideration is required for future impact testing to assess surfaces to specific impacts that occur in game situations through the use of appropriate test devices.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
草叶高度对天然草坪运动场地表面冲击特性的影响
采用0.5 kg和2.25 kg克莱格冲击土壤测试仪(CIST)和动态表面测试仪(DST)装置,在受控条件下评估了2个运动场根区(粘土壤土、砂土)3种草叶高度处理(50 mm、25 mm、< 1 mm)的效果。结果取决于测试装置、冲击能量和冲击落点数。在调节冲击行为方面,草的存在被证明比特定草高更重要,在50毫米和25毫米处理之间没有发现差异。在0.5 kg CIST导弹的第一次降落时,草叶(50 mm和25 mm处理)降低了峰值减速度(P < 0.05),而在第3次降落时,草叶没有吸收峰值减速度(P < 0.05),这表明在低能量单次撞击时,草叶吸收了一些冲击能量,而在叶片被反复加载压扁时,草叶吸收了一些冲击能量。高能量2.25 kg CIST的峰值减速度在叶片第一次滴下无显著差异,但在< 1 mm处理的第三次滴下显著降低(P < 0.05),土壤表现出较大的塑性位移(P < 0.05)。在DST测量的运动员特异性冲击应力下,不同处理的表面加载率和能量吸收没有差异,表明草叶可能不会影响运动员的冲击。未来的冲击测试需要更多的考虑,通过使用适当的测试设备来评估在游戏环境中发生的特定冲击表面。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Video capture and post-processing technique for approximating 3D projectile trajectory Reliability of an electromagnetic tracking system in describing pitching mechanics Body position and technique effects on displacement in the dyno maneuver in rock climbing Virtual and “real-life” wall/rock climbing: motor movement comparisons and video gaming pedagogical perceptions A fencing robot for performance testing in elite fencers
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1