Comparison of knowledge management application among librarians of medical universities based on Williams and Bukowitz model

Anahita Giti, ileen fasihi, Z. Faraji, M. Golchin
{"title":"Comparison of knowledge management application among librarians of medical universities based on Williams and Bukowitz model","authors":"Anahita Giti, ileen fasihi, Z. Faraji, M. Golchin","doi":"10.29252/JMIS.6.4.50","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Aim: Knowledge, as one of the assets, plays a pivotal role in gaining the competitive advantage of the organization and institutions and is considered the ultimate alternative to production, wealth, and monetary capital. This study aimed to compare the application of knowledge management among librarians of University of Medical Sciences of Hamadan, Iran, and University of Welfare and Rehabilitation Sciences based on Williams and Bukowitz's models. Methods: In this descriptive-analytical study the statistical population includes all librarians (81 individuals) working in libraries of Medical Sciences Universities of Hamadan and Iran, and Universit of welfare and rehabilitation sciences. The method of data collection is Bukowitz and William's seven-component questionnaire. SPSS statistical software 17 and analysis of variance, Tukey and Kruskal tests were used to analyze the data. Results: The mean of the studied components at Hamadan University of Medical sciences is about 41units higher than the mean score in the University of Welfare Sciences and at Iran university of medical sciences the maen score is 28 units higher than the Welfare University. Also, the mean for female employees is about 20 units less than male employees (with constant consideration of other variables effect). The other variables did not have a statistically significant effect on this mean. Conclusion: By summing the scores of all components, this score was statistically significant in the three studied universities and the mean score of Hamedan University library staff was more than the other two universities and the mean score of the staff of Welfare Sciences University was less than the others. It seems that knowledge management has better conditions at Hamadan University of Medical Sciences.","PeriodicalId":231482,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Modern Medical Information Sciences","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Modern Medical Information Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.29252/JMIS.6.4.50","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aim: Knowledge, as one of the assets, plays a pivotal role in gaining the competitive advantage of the organization and institutions and is considered the ultimate alternative to production, wealth, and monetary capital. This study aimed to compare the application of knowledge management among librarians of University of Medical Sciences of Hamadan, Iran, and University of Welfare and Rehabilitation Sciences based on Williams and Bukowitz's models. Methods: In this descriptive-analytical study the statistical population includes all librarians (81 individuals) working in libraries of Medical Sciences Universities of Hamadan and Iran, and Universit of welfare and rehabilitation sciences. The method of data collection is Bukowitz and William's seven-component questionnaire. SPSS statistical software 17 and analysis of variance, Tukey and Kruskal tests were used to analyze the data. Results: The mean of the studied components at Hamadan University of Medical sciences is about 41units higher than the mean score in the University of Welfare Sciences and at Iran university of medical sciences the maen score is 28 units higher than the Welfare University. Also, the mean for female employees is about 20 units less than male employees (with constant consideration of other variables effect). The other variables did not have a statistically significant effect on this mean. Conclusion: By summing the scores of all components, this score was statistically significant in the three studied universities and the mean score of Hamedan University library staff was more than the other two universities and the mean score of the staff of Welfare Sciences University was less than the others. It seems that knowledge management has better conditions at Hamadan University of Medical Sciences.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
基于Williams和Bukowitz模型的医学院校图书馆员知识管理应用比较
目的:知识作为一种资产,在组织和机构获得竞争优势中起着举足轻重的作用,被认为是生产、财富和货币资本的最终替代品。本研究以Williams和Bukowitz的模型为基础,比较伊朗哈马丹医学大学和福利与康复科学大学图书馆员在知识管理方面的应用。方法:本描述性分析研究的统计人群包括在伊朗哈马丹医学大学和福利与康复科学大学图书馆工作的所有图书馆员(81人)。数据收集的方法是Bukowitz和William的七分量问卷。采用SPSS统计软件17和方差分析,采用Tukey和Kruskal检验对数据进行分析。结果:哈马丹医学大学的研究成分的平均值比福利大学高41个单位,伊朗医学大学的研究成分的平均值比福利大学高28个单位。此外,女性员工的平均值比男性员工低20个单位左右(持续考虑其他变量的影响)。其他变量对该平均值没有统计学意义上的显著影响。结论:综合各组成部分的得分,三所大学图书馆工作人员的平均得分均有统计学意义,其中哈马丹大学图书馆工作人员的平均得分高于其他两所大学,福利科学大学图书馆工作人员的平均得分低于其他两所大学。在哈马丹医科大学,知识管理的条件似乎比较好。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Recognizing the factors affecting the satisfaction of students of Hormozgan University of Medical Sciences: A qualitative study Advanced cardiopulmonary resuscitation updates 2020: a narrative review Design and implementation of tools for rapid assessment of the status of documentation of emergency department' physicians The acceptance model of e-learning during the coronavirus pandemic Investigating Barriers and Providing an Appropriate Model for Establishing Total Quality Management: A Case Study in Hospitals
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1