Segmental muscle innervation as a basic anatomophysiological knowledge for diagnostic procedure of neuromuscular disorders and thus, a way for accurate EMG diagnosis of single root injury. Retrospective study in patients with radicular symptoms

Olga Kwast-Rabben, H. Heikkilä, M. Fagerlund, E. Nordh
{"title":"Segmental muscle innervation as a basic anatomophysiological knowledge for diagnostic procedure of neuromuscular disorders and thus, a way for accurate EMG diagnosis of single root injury. Retrospective study in patients with radicular symptoms","authors":"Olga Kwast-Rabben, H. Heikkilä, M. Fagerlund, E. Nordh","doi":"10.33425/2768-4598.1021","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: An accurate identification of the injured nerve roots by EMG in patients with symptomatic CSD requires that the examined muscles are innervated by a single nerve root. In the present retrospective study, the authors address the question of whether such innervation of chosen muscles in the upper extremity can be identified. Methods: Scored EMG results of chosen muscles with the hypothesized innervation by C6, C7 or C8 nerve roots, collected from 42 patients, were compiled as single EMG variables and compared with the respective MRI data, possibly responsible for injury of those roots, using Spearman’s rho (SRC) analysis. Subsequently, each EMG variable was adopted as specific diagnostic method for single root injury and tested for its specificity and then sensitivity in relation to the data of the highest ranked MRI, used as a ‘gold standard method’ Results: SRC results showed positive rank correlation, with the highest p-values, between EMG and the respective MRI variables, in 64 included extremities. Consequently, the assumed EMG-C6, -C7 and -C8 methods showed a high specificity (97% - 100%) against the respective highest ranked MRI. The relative sensitivity of the EMG methods calculated in this way were 38% for the C6-root, 87% for the C7 and 50% for the C8. Conclusions: The results corroborate the presumed innervation of the chosens muscles by single C6, C7, or C8 nerve root, thus allowing the use of needle EMG examination of those muscles for accurate identification of injured single nerve roots in patients with symptomatic CSD.","PeriodicalId":371381,"journal":{"name":"Archives of Clinical Trials","volume":"12 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-11-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archives of Clinical Trials","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.33425/2768-4598.1021","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: An accurate identification of the injured nerve roots by EMG in patients with symptomatic CSD requires that the examined muscles are innervated by a single nerve root. In the present retrospective study, the authors address the question of whether such innervation of chosen muscles in the upper extremity can be identified. Methods: Scored EMG results of chosen muscles with the hypothesized innervation by C6, C7 or C8 nerve roots, collected from 42 patients, were compiled as single EMG variables and compared with the respective MRI data, possibly responsible for injury of those roots, using Spearman’s rho (SRC) analysis. Subsequently, each EMG variable was adopted as specific diagnostic method for single root injury and tested for its specificity and then sensitivity in relation to the data of the highest ranked MRI, used as a ‘gold standard method’ Results: SRC results showed positive rank correlation, with the highest p-values, between EMG and the respective MRI variables, in 64 included extremities. Consequently, the assumed EMG-C6, -C7 and -C8 methods showed a high specificity (97% - 100%) against the respective highest ranked MRI. The relative sensitivity of the EMG methods calculated in this way were 38% for the C6-root, 87% for the C7 and 50% for the C8. Conclusions: The results corroborate the presumed innervation of the chosens muscles by single C6, C7, or C8 nerve root, thus allowing the use of needle EMG examination of those muscles for accurate identification of injured single nerve roots in patients with symptomatic CSD.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
节段性肌肉神经支配是神经肌肉疾病诊断的基本解剖生理学知识,是准确诊断单根损伤的一种方法。根状症状患者的回顾性研究
背景:在症状性CSD患者中,肌电图准确识别损伤的神经根需要被检查的肌肉受单一神经根支配。在目前的回顾性研究中,作者讨论了上肢选定肌肉的神经支配是否可以识别的问题。方法:收集42例患者,选取假设受C6、C7或C8神经根支配的肌肉,采用Spearman’s rho (SRC)分析,将其EMG评分结果汇编为单个EMG变量,并与可能导致这些神经根损伤的相应MRI数据进行比较。随后,采用每个肌电图变量作为单根损伤的特异性诊断方法,并根据最高等级MRI数据测试其特异性和敏感性,作为“金标准方法”。结果:SRC结果显示,在64个被纳入的肢体中,肌电图与各自的MRI变量之间的等级呈正相关,p值最高。因此,假设的肌电图- c6, - c7和- c8方法对各自最高级的MRI显示出高特异性(97% - 100%)。用这种方法计算的肌电图方法对c6根的相对灵敏度为38%,对C7根的相对灵敏度为87%,对C8根的相对灵敏度为50%。结论:本研究结果证实了所选肌肉受C6、C7或C8神经根支配的假设,因此可以使用肌电针检查这些肌肉,准确识别有症状的CSD患者损伤的单神经根。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Clinical Diagnosis of Pleuroparenchymal Fibroelastosis The Matryoshka code of COVID-19 mRNA vaccines: overlapping viral sequences? Risk of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome in infertile patients with PCOS treated by HP HMG Segmental muscle innervation as a basic anatomophysiological knowledge for diagnostic procedure of neuromuscular disorders and thus, a way for accurate EMG diagnosis of single root injury. Retrospective study in patients with radicular symptoms Total Wrist Replacement: State of the Art, Challenges and Pitfalls: A Comparative Review
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1