Discrimination in Sport’s Sphere: Concept, Legal Nature and Methods of Counteraction

A. Sergeeva
{"title":"Discrimination in Sport’s Sphere: Concept, Legal Nature and Methods of Counteraction","authors":"A. Sergeeva","doi":"10.21639/2313-6715.2022.2.8.","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The authors of the article analyze current issues of how to qualify discrimination manifestations in relations to sports events. The authors distinguish two forms of the discrimination behavior; one of them represents the demeaning of dignity of the person on the ground of the person’s belonging to a certain social group. The second form relates to creating the restrictions to access to sports events participation based on the wrong interpretation of the equal opportunities of sportsmen. The first form of discrimination can be viewed as an actual component of extremism whereas the second one, being atypical, has complicated medical and legal nature that is not appropriately reflected in the legal norms of the sports legislation. Counteraction to the ordinary form of discrimination is feasible when one uses administrative and criminal legal instruments. The authors summarize significant volume of empirical material that shows the need for optimization of the law enforcement practice in this field. In the system of current law regulation of sports events, the priority is in imposing penalties on sports organizations if their members or participants of sports events allow manifestation of discrimination. People who are directly accountable for the discrimination manifestations rarely are found personally responsible for that which is not related at all to the character and degree of the social danger of discriminatory behavior.","PeriodicalId":433311,"journal":{"name":"Prologue: Law Journal","volume":"30 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Prologue: Law Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21639/2313-6715.2022.2.8.","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The authors of the article analyze current issues of how to qualify discrimination manifestations in relations to sports events. The authors distinguish two forms of the discrimination behavior; one of them represents the demeaning of dignity of the person on the ground of the person’s belonging to a certain social group. The second form relates to creating the restrictions to access to sports events participation based on the wrong interpretation of the equal opportunities of sportsmen. The first form of discrimination can be viewed as an actual component of extremism whereas the second one, being atypical, has complicated medical and legal nature that is not appropriately reflected in the legal norms of the sports legislation. Counteraction to the ordinary form of discrimination is feasible when one uses administrative and criminal legal instruments. The authors summarize significant volume of empirical material that shows the need for optimization of the law enforcement practice in this field. In the system of current law regulation of sports events, the priority is in imposing penalties on sports organizations if their members or participants of sports events allow manifestation of discrimination. People who are directly accountable for the discrimination manifestations rarely are found personally responsible for that which is not related at all to the character and degree of the social danger of discriminatory behavior.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
体育领域的歧视:概念、法律性质及应对方法
本文作者分析了当前体育赛事中歧视表现如何限定的问题。作者区分了两种形式的歧视行为;其中一种是基于一个人属于某个社会群体而贬低他的尊严。第二种形式是基于对运动员平等机会的错误解释,对参与体育赛事的机会设置限制。第一种形式的歧视可被视为极端主义的实际组成部分,而第二种形式的歧视是非典型的,具有复杂的医学和法律性质,没有适当地反映在体育立法的法律规范中。当使用行政和刑事法律文书时,对普通形式的歧视的反击是可行的。作者总结了大量的经验材料,表明需要优化这一领域的执法实践。在现行的体育赛事法律规制体系中,如果体育组织的成员或参与者允许表现出歧视行为,首先要对其进行处罚。对歧视表现负有直接责任的人很少被发现对那些与歧视行为的性质和社会危险程度完全无关的行为负有个人责任。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Party Acts` Role and Significance in the Prosecutor's Supervision Implementation in the USSR in the 1920s-1930s SPECIALTY 12.00.15: A STATISTICAL STUDY OF SUBJECT MATTERS AND THE NUMBER OF DISSERTATIONS PRESENTED TO DEFENSE Electronic Investigation Technologies and Modern Format of Technical and Criminalistic Support for Criminal Cases Investigation ACTUAL PROBLEMS OF DEFINITION OF THE AIM OF CRIMINAL PROCEDURAL ACTIVITY AND MEANS OF ITS ACHIEVEMENT To the Issue of Business Trips in Labour Law of the Russian Federation
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1