C. Goodin, Lucas Cagle, Greg Henley, Rhett Fereday, Justin Carrillo, Peilin Song, David P. McInnis
{"title":"Evaluating Tradeoffs for Swarm Reconnaissance with Autonomous Ground Vehicles","authors":"C. Goodin, Lucas Cagle, Greg Henley, Rhett Fereday, Justin Carrillo, Peilin Song, David P. McInnis","doi":"10.1115/1.4054581","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n Autonomous ground vehicles (AGV) operating collaboratively have several advantages over vehicles operating alone. An AGV team may be more resilient and efficient than a single AGV. Other advantages of AGV teams include increased coverage and multiple viewing angles of terrain features as well as resistance to failure from any single AGV. Additionally, AGV teams can explore large terrains more quickly and thoroughly than a single system. In this work, the feasibility of using a team of high-mobility AGV to explore a navigation corridor, map the terrain, and autonomously flag obstacles for future navigation is evaluated. Focusing on negative obstacles, the value of using multiple vehicles to map a navigation corridor is quantified. This study is the first to evaluate large teams of AGV collaborating in realistic off-road, 3D environments. The feasibility of the large-scale AGV team is demonstrated while avoiding the high cost of purchasing and testing large numbers of vehicles by using the MSU Autonomous Vehicle Simulator (MAVS), a high-fidelity, physics-based simulation tool. The cost and benefits of increasing the AGV team size are evaluated. The simulation results show how factors like fuel use, map coverage, and obstacle detection are influenced by increasing numbers of AGV in the team. The simulation architecture is presented and experiments quantifying the performance of the simulator are shown. Finally, a model for evaluating the tradeoff between mission effectiveness and fuel use is developed and presented to demonstrate the utility of this approach.","PeriodicalId":164923,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Autonomous Vehicles and Systems","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-05-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Autonomous Vehicles and Systems","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4054581","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Autonomous ground vehicles (AGV) operating collaboratively have several advantages over vehicles operating alone. An AGV team may be more resilient and efficient than a single AGV. Other advantages of AGV teams include increased coverage and multiple viewing angles of terrain features as well as resistance to failure from any single AGV. Additionally, AGV teams can explore large terrains more quickly and thoroughly than a single system. In this work, the feasibility of using a team of high-mobility AGV to explore a navigation corridor, map the terrain, and autonomously flag obstacles for future navigation is evaluated. Focusing on negative obstacles, the value of using multiple vehicles to map a navigation corridor is quantified. This study is the first to evaluate large teams of AGV collaborating in realistic off-road, 3D environments. The feasibility of the large-scale AGV team is demonstrated while avoiding the high cost of purchasing and testing large numbers of vehicles by using the MSU Autonomous Vehicle Simulator (MAVS), a high-fidelity, physics-based simulation tool. The cost and benefits of increasing the AGV team size are evaluated. The simulation results show how factors like fuel use, map coverage, and obstacle detection are influenced by increasing numbers of AGV in the team. The simulation architecture is presented and experiments quantifying the performance of the simulator are shown. Finally, a model for evaluating the tradeoff between mission effectiveness and fuel use is developed and presented to demonstrate the utility of this approach.