‘n most…’: Internet rating as a speech genre

V. Dementyev
{"title":"‘n most…’: Internet rating as a speech genre","authors":"V. Dementyev","doi":"10.18500/2311-0740-2021-3-31-226-244","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The research is focused on the genre of Internet rating (an article representing a group of homogeneous objects in the form of a ranked, most often numbered list) and is based on approx. 600 texts of Internet rankings (2019–2020) from approx. 120 sites. The article analyzes the following characteristics of the Internet rating: general speech-genre, structural, thematic (thematic areas, key lexemes, semantics and pragmatics), evaluative (ranking principles, author’s subjectivity, values) ones. A lot of attention is paid to such speech-genre dominants of the Internet rating as the principles of assessment / ranking, author’s subjectivity, expression, as well as some factors of cultural borrowing (“ratingness”). Three parts of the Internet rating structure have been identified: 1) the heading, which the content aggregator brings to the news browser; 2) a description of the Internet rating; 3) the ranked objects themselves. The article singles out and describes the linguistic markers of the Internet rating genre and its main structural types, as well as the most common topics of Internet ratings: cinema (TV shows, cartoons, anime), books / writers, signs of the Zodiac, the world of cats and dogs, tourism; the most common numbers (10, 5, no number, 3, 7, 1, 6, 4, 20); illocutionary types of Internet ratings (entertaining ones prevail, among non-entertaining ones advice and (presumably) hidden advertising stand out) / The author offers their quantitative indicators as well. The article analyzes the principles of ranking objects of Internet ratings and their relationship with the image of the author and addressee of the Internet rating. Particular attention is paid to the ways in which the author tries, on the one hand, to prove the objectivity of the rating (to refer to the conducted research, survey, authoritative opinion, etc.), on the other hand, to explicate their subjectivity (for example, to encourage readers to express their own opinions).","PeriodicalId":169339,"journal":{"name":"International Journal “Speech Genres”","volume":"22 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal “Speech Genres”","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18500/2311-0740-2021-3-31-226-244","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The research is focused on the genre of Internet rating (an article representing a group of homogeneous objects in the form of a ranked, most often numbered list) and is based on approx. 600 texts of Internet rankings (2019–2020) from approx. 120 sites. The article analyzes the following characteristics of the Internet rating: general speech-genre, structural, thematic (thematic areas, key lexemes, semantics and pragmatics), evaluative (ranking principles, author’s subjectivity, values) ones. A lot of attention is paid to such speech-genre dominants of the Internet rating as the principles of assessment / ranking, author’s subjectivity, expression, as well as some factors of cultural borrowing (“ratingness”). Three parts of the Internet rating structure have been identified: 1) the heading, which the content aggregator brings to the news browser; 2) a description of the Internet rating; 3) the ranked objects themselves. The article singles out and describes the linguistic markers of the Internet rating genre and its main structural types, as well as the most common topics of Internet ratings: cinema (TV shows, cartoons, anime), books / writers, signs of the Zodiac, the world of cats and dogs, tourism; the most common numbers (10, 5, no number, 3, 7, 1, 6, 4, 20); illocutionary types of Internet ratings (entertaining ones prevail, among non-entertaining ones advice and (presumably) hidden advertising stand out) / The author offers their quantitative indicators as well. The article analyzes the principles of ranking objects of Internet ratings and their relationship with the image of the author and addressee of the Internet rating. Particular attention is paid to the ways in which the author tries, on the one hand, to prove the objectivity of the rating (to refer to the conducted research, survey, authoritative opinion, etc.), on the other hand, to explicate their subjectivity (for example, to encourage readers to express their own opinions).
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
“n most…”:网络对演讲类型的评价
这项研究的重点是互联网评级的类型(一篇文章代表一组同质的对象,以排名的形式,通常是编号的列表),并基于大约。600个文本的互联网排名(2019-2020)从大约。120网站。文章分析了网络评比的以下特征:一般言语类型、结构、专题(专题领域、关键词汇、语义和语用)、评比(评比原则、作者主体性、价值观)。在网络评分中占据主导地位的语言类型,如评价/排名原则、作者主体性、表达以及一些文化借用因素(“评分”)等,受到了很多关注。已经确定了互联网评级结构的三个部分:1)标题,内容聚合器将其带到新闻浏览器中;2)对互联网评级的描述;3)排名对象本身。文章对网络评分体裁的语言标记、主要结构类型以及网络评分最常见的话题进行了梳理和描述:电影(电视节目,漫画,动漫),书籍/作家,黄道十二宫,猫狗世界,旅游;最常见的数字(10,5,no number, 3,7,1,6,4,20);言外之语类型的互联网评级(娱乐性的占多数,非娱乐性的建议和(可能)隐藏的广告突出)/作者也提供了它们的定量指标。文章分析了网络评价的排序对象的原则,以及它们与网络评价的作者形象和收件人形象的关系。特别要注意的是,作者一方面试图证明评级的客观性(参考所进行的研究、调查、权威意见等),另一方面试图阐明其主观性(例如,鼓励读者表达自己的意见)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
On the problem of integral description of speech genres Genre of a scientific article on the Internet: Structural and semiotic transformation Reader’s comment as a genre of the modern Russian blog sphere Open talk in the oral discourse of reproductive medicine: Peculiarities of professional refraction Motivational speech: Specifics of the speech genre functioning
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1