The "Echo Chamber"

Réda Bensmaïa
{"title":"The \"Echo Chamber\"","authors":"Réda Bensmaïa","doi":"10.3138/YCL.62.002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract:Is it possible to write something new about an author who has always accompanied his work with his own commentary? In this article, I tried to rise to the challenge by avoiding two pitfalls: on the one hand, that of Psittacism—which consists of repeating the author's theses by forcing them into a system—and, on the other hand, that of the Reduction to a unified line of thought that would have been underplaying the heterogeneity and pluralism of the theses in question. This led me to highlight some of the issues related to the tactics that Roland Barthes developed in his work: a tactics that will have no other objective than to free oneself from the blackmail of the theory and the delirium that alienate its pretenders.","PeriodicalId":342699,"journal":{"name":"The Yearbook of Comparative Literature","volume":"9 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Yearbook of Comparative Literature","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3138/YCL.62.002","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract:Is it possible to write something new about an author who has always accompanied his work with his own commentary? In this article, I tried to rise to the challenge by avoiding two pitfalls: on the one hand, that of Psittacism—which consists of repeating the author's theses by forcing them into a system—and, on the other hand, that of the Reduction to a unified line of thought that would have been underplaying the heterogeneity and pluralism of the theses in question. This led me to highlight some of the issues related to the tactics that Roland Barthes developed in his work: a tactics that will have no other objective than to free oneself from the blackmail of the theory and the delirium that alienate its pretenders.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
“回音室”
摘要:对于一个总是在作品中伴随着自己的评论的作家,有可能写出一些新的东西吗?在这篇文章中,我试图通过避免两个陷阱来迎接挑战:一方面,这是一种唯心主义——它通过将作者的论点强行纳入一个系统来重复作者的论点;另一方面,这是一种对统一思想路线的还原,这将低估所讨论的论点的异质性和多元性。这让我强调了一些与罗兰·巴特在他的作品中发展的策略相关的问题:一种策略,除了将自己从理论的勒索和疏远其伪装者的谵妄中解放出来之外,没有其他目标。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
“A Stratagem for Self-Oblivion”: Rosselli, Real Talk, and the Abolition of the “I” Foreign Poems Damage and Repair in Environmental Assessment A Seafloor for the Disaster Receding Margins: Black Rice and the Rhythms of Tidal Transfer
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1