Hurst Methods for Fractal Analysis of Electrocardiographical Signals

Evgeniya Gospodinova
{"title":"Hurst Methods for Fractal Analysis of Electrocardiographical Signals","authors":"Evgeniya Gospodinova","doi":"10.33422/researchconf.2019.12.895","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article is devoted to the fractal analysis of the intervals between heart beats (RR intervals) obtained from electrocardiographical signals. The following methods are used to determine the fractal behavior of the studied signals by the Hurst exponent: Rescaled range, wavelet method, Detrended Fluctuation Analysis. The Hurst exponent value determined by the proposed methods depends on a number of factors: the estimation method, the size of the data, the type of wavelet function, etc. To solve the problem associated with finding the optimal Hurst method, fractal Gaussian noise (FGN) was simulated with different inputs of the Hurst exponent (0.6, 0.7, 0.8, 0.9) and with different data lengths (1000, 10000, 100000). The testing results of the accuracy of the Hurst exponent when applying those three methods is that at a data length of 100000 points, the relative error of the Hurst exponent is the smallest. The Detrended Fluctuation Analysis and wavelet method for estimating the Hurst exponents with respect to the precision parameter have a relative error of less than 1.4%. These two methods have been applied to examine the Holter recordings of two groups of people: healthy and unhealthy subjects. The results show that the Hurst values in healthy and diseased individuals differ. Another marker used to distinguish between the two groups is the generalized Hurst exponent, with diseased subjects having monofractal behavior and healthy subjects-multifractal. In the conclusion, based on the obtained results, it follows that fractal analysis is appropriate for estimating the fuction state of the human body.","PeriodicalId":346784,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of The International Conference on Research in Engineering and Technology","volume":"3 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-12-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of The International Conference on Research in Engineering and Technology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.33422/researchconf.2019.12.895","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This article is devoted to the fractal analysis of the intervals between heart beats (RR intervals) obtained from electrocardiographical signals. The following methods are used to determine the fractal behavior of the studied signals by the Hurst exponent: Rescaled range, wavelet method, Detrended Fluctuation Analysis. The Hurst exponent value determined by the proposed methods depends on a number of factors: the estimation method, the size of the data, the type of wavelet function, etc. To solve the problem associated with finding the optimal Hurst method, fractal Gaussian noise (FGN) was simulated with different inputs of the Hurst exponent (0.6, 0.7, 0.8, 0.9) and with different data lengths (1000, 10000, 100000). The testing results of the accuracy of the Hurst exponent when applying those three methods is that at a data length of 100000 points, the relative error of the Hurst exponent is the smallest. The Detrended Fluctuation Analysis and wavelet method for estimating the Hurst exponents with respect to the precision parameter have a relative error of less than 1.4%. These two methods have been applied to examine the Holter recordings of two groups of people: healthy and unhealthy subjects. The results show that the Hurst values in healthy and diseased individuals differ. Another marker used to distinguish between the two groups is the generalized Hurst exponent, with diseased subjects having monofractal behavior and healthy subjects-multifractal. In the conclusion, based on the obtained results, it follows that fractal analysis is appropriate for estimating the fuction state of the human body.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
心电图信号分形分析的Hurst方法
本文研究了从心电图信号中得到的心跳间隔(RR间隔)的分形分析。利用赫斯特指数确定研究信号的分形行为的方法有:重标量程法、小波法、去趋势波动分析法。所提方法确定的Hurst指数值取决于许多因素:估计方法、数据的大小、小波函数的类型等。为了解决寻找最优Hurst方法的问题,采用不同的Hurst指数输入(0.6、0.7、0.8、0.9)和不同的数据长度(1000、10000、100000)对分形高斯噪声(FGN)进行了模拟。应用这三种方法对Hurst指数精度的测试结果是,在100000点的数据长度下,Hurst指数的相对误差最小。消趋势波动分析法和小波法估计Hurst指数相对于精度参数的相对误差小于1.4%。这两种方法已被应用于检查两组人的霍尔特记录:健康和不健康的受试者。结果表明,健康个体和患病个体的Hurst值存在差异。另一个用于区分两组的标记是广义赫斯特指数,患病受试者具有单分形行为,而健康受试者具有多重分形行为。综上所述,根据所获得的结果,分形分析适合于人体功能状态的估计。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Hurst Methods for Fractal Analysis of Electrocardiographical Signals Median and Maximum Frequency Analysis of Vibration Signals on Human Face Free convection characteristics in a vertical minichannel with two grooves Spectral Analysis of Heart Rate Variability of Holter Records
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1