Moral Sanctions in the Ethics of O.G. Drobnitskii

A. Prokofyev
{"title":"Moral Sanctions in the Ethics of O.G. Drobnitskii","authors":"A. Prokofyev","doi":"10.21146/2074-4870-2022-22-1-5-18","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The paper reconstructs O.G. Drobnitskii’s view on moral sanctions and fits it into the history of studying this phenomenon in ethics, sociology and anthropology. The description of moral sanction proposed by O.G. Drobnitskii generally coincides with the tradition of its un­derstanding that links it with public condemnation of a transgressor. In his first analysis of the problem, in The Short Dictionary of Ethics, he defines moral sanction as a spiritual im­pact on a transgressor that does not affect her real position and material interest. Here moral sanction consists in censure. In his monograph The Concept of Morality: Historical-Critical Essay, he further develops this idea and proposes the conception of the be-polar character of moral sanction: the first pole is external (the public condemnation itself), and the second pole is internal (the acceptance of the condemnation by a transgressor and her feelings of shame, repentance, and remorse). This is what makes morality different from custom which rests upon the sheer ‘emotional-volitional pressure’. So the ‘ideal character’ of moral sanc­tion reveals itself not only in the absence of physical coercion but in the proper ‘subjective attitude [of a transgressor] to herself’. The second tradition of understanding of moral sanc­tions includes among them the very self-condemnation of a transgressor and her negative emotions of self-appraisal. Drobnitskii got closer to this tradition in a few fragments of his dissertational thesis.","PeriodicalId":360102,"journal":{"name":"Ethical Thought","volume":"71 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ethical Thought","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21146/2074-4870-2022-22-1-5-18","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The paper reconstructs O.G. Drobnitskii’s view on moral sanctions and fits it into the history of studying this phenomenon in ethics, sociology and anthropology. The description of moral sanction proposed by O.G. Drobnitskii generally coincides with the tradition of its un­derstanding that links it with public condemnation of a transgressor. In his first analysis of the problem, in The Short Dictionary of Ethics, he defines moral sanction as a spiritual im­pact on a transgressor that does not affect her real position and material interest. Here moral sanction consists in censure. In his monograph The Concept of Morality: Historical-Critical Essay, he further develops this idea and proposes the conception of the be-polar character of moral sanction: the first pole is external (the public condemnation itself), and the second pole is internal (the acceptance of the condemnation by a transgressor and her feelings of shame, repentance, and remorse). This is what makes morality different from custom which rests upon the sheer ‘emotional-volitional pressure’. So the ‘ideal character’ of moral sanc­tion reveals itself not only in the absence of physical coercion but in the proper ‘subjective attitude [of a transgressor] to herself’. The second tradition of understanding of moral sanc­tions includes among them the very self-condemnation of a transgressor and her negative emotions of self-appraisal. Drobnitskii got closer to this tradition in a few fragments of his dissertational thesis.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
《德罗勃尼茨基伦理学》中的道德制裁
本文重构了德罗布尼茨基的道德制裁观,并将其纳入伦理学、社会学和人类学对这一现象的研究历史。O.G. Drobnitskii对道德制裁的描述大体上与传统的理解一致,即将其与对违法者的公开谴责联系起来。在他对这个问题的第一次分析中,在《伦理学短词典》中,他将道德制裁定义为对违法者的精神影响,而不影响她的实际地位和物质利益。在这里,道德制裁包括谴责。在他的专著《道德概念:历史批判文章》中,他进一步发展了这一观点,并提出了道德制裁的两极特征的概念:第一极是外部的(公众谴责本身),第二极是内部的(接受违法者的谴责以及她的羞耻、忏悔和悔恨的感觉)。这就是使道德不同于纯粹依赖于“情感-意志压力”的习俗的原因。因此,道德制裁的“理想品格”不仅在没有身体强制的情况下表现出来,而且在(违法者)对自己的适当“主观态度”中表现出来。理解道德制裁的第二种传统包括对违法者的自我谴责以及她对自我评价的负面情绪。德罗勃尼茨基在他的论文片段中更接近这个传统。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
On the Ethical, Moral and Pragmatic Justification of Political Decisions The Idea of Just War in the Western Ethical Tradition (from Antiquity to the Mid-18th Century) Proceedings of a Discussion on the Paper “Moral Philosophy and Ethics”, by Abduslam Guseynov, a Member of Russian Academy of Sciences Aristotle in the Moral Philosophy of the Early Modern Period (Treatise of H. Grotius «On the Law of War and Peace») Jus Post Bellum in Just War Theory
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1