When to Use European Consensus

D. Kagiaros
{"title":"When to Use European Consensus","authors":"D. Kagiaros","doi":"10.1017/9781108564779.014","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"European consensus (EuC) is an interpretative tool employed by the European Court of Human Rights (henceforth ‘the Court’) and constitutes a fundamental aspect of its decision-making process. At a time when the legitimacy of the Court as the ultimate arbiter of human rights protection in Europe is under challenge by many of the Contracting Parties to the European Convention on Human Rights (‘ECHR’ or ‘the Convention’), consensus-based interpretation provides a useful means to legitimise the Court’s judgments and ensure their enforcement.","PeriodicalId":192738,"journal":{"name":"Building Consensus on European Consensus","volume":"2 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-01-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Building Consensus on European Consensus","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108564779.014","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

European consensus (EuC) is an interpretative tool employed by the European Court of Human Rights (henceforth ‘the Court’) and constitutes a fundamental aspect of its decision-making process. At a time when the legitimacy of the Court as the ultimate arbiter of human rights protection in Europe is under challenge by many of the Contracting Parties to the European Convention on Human Rights (‘ECHR’ or ‘the Convention’), consensus-based interpretation provides a useful means to legitimise the Court’s judgments and ensure their enforcement.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
何时使用欧洲共识
欧洲协商一致是欧洲人权法院(以下简称“法院”)使用的一种解释性工具,是其决策过程的一个基本方面。当欧洲法院作为欧洲人权保护的最终仲裁者的合法性受到《欧洲人权公约》(ECHR或《公约》)的许多缔约国的挑战时,基于共识的解释提供了一种有用的手段,使法院的判决合法化并确保其执行。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The Consensus Argument in NGOs’Amicus CuriaeBriefs When to Use European Consensus Determining the Content of the European Consensus Concept Levels of Generality in the Comparative Reasoning of the European Court of Human Rights and the European Court of Justice European Consensus
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1