Comparison of Learning Method Effectiveness Between Jigsaw and Team Game Tournament on Achievement and Interpersonal Relationship Skill in Nursing Freshmen

Made Indra Ayu Astarini, Linda Juwita, A. Setiawan
{"title":"Comparison of Learning Method Effectiveness Between Jigsaw and Team Game Tournament on Achievement and Interpersonal Relationship Skill in Nursing Freshmen","authors":"Made Indra Ayu Astarini, Linda Juwita, A. Setiawan","doi":"10.24990/INJEC.V3I1.205","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: Evaluation results every semester about biochemical obtained by students the average value below 50. Cooperative learning method jigsaw and team game tournament (TGT) were an alternative learning method that can improved student learning outcomes. The purpose of this research was to understand the effectiveness of applied of jigsaw learning method compared to TGT to interpersonal relationship skill and achievement. Methods: This research used pre-experiment with research design Pretest-Posttest Comparison Group Design. Target population was all nursing students in two nursing institutions in Surabaya. Sample size were 208 chosen by total sampling. Independent variables were jigsaw and TGT and dependent variables were interpersonal relationship skill and achievement. Study instruments were interpersonal relationship skill questionnaire and objective test. Data analysis uses paired t test with α ≤ 0.05, prior normality test will be conducted.  Results: Most respondents were 19 years old, single, female and lived with their parents. There was different result in student achievement between TGT and Jigsaw method (p = 0,005), TGT mean rank was 97,89 than jigsaw was 76,52. There was no different interpersonal relationship ability between TGT and jigsaw method (p = 0,263). Conclusions: TGT more effective than jigsaw to increase student learning achievement in biochemical. Those method has not different for student interpersonal relationship ability, because the student has been in good criteria for interpersonal relationship ability. Further implementation could be broad, other object in nursing could be the target, difficult subject would be underlined.","PeriodicalId":431220,"journal":{"name":"INDONESIAN NURSING JOURNAL OF EDUCATION AND CLINIC (INJEC)","volume":"28 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-01-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"INDONESIAN NURSING JOURNAL OF EDUCATION AND CLINIC (INJEC)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24990/INJEC.V3I1.205","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Introduction: Evaluation results every semester about biochemical obtained by students the average value below 50. Cooperative learning method jigsaw and team game tournament (TGT) were an alternative learning method that can improved student learning outcomes. The purpose of this research was to understand the effectiveness of applied of jigsaw learning method compared to TGT to interpersonal relationship skill and achievement. Methods: This research used pre-experiment with research design Pretest-Posttest Comparison Group Design. Target population was all nursing students in two nursing institutions in Surabaya. Sample size were 208 chosen by total sampling. Independent variables were jigsaw and TGT and dependent variables were interpersonal relationship skill and achievement. Study instruments were interpersonal relationship skill questionnaire and objective test. Data analysis uses paired t test with α ≤ 0.05, prior normality test will be conducted.  Results: Most respondents were 19 years old, single, female and lived with their parents. There was different result in student achievement between TGT and Jigsaw method (p = 0,005), TGT mean rank was 97,89 than jigsaw was 76,52. There was no different interpersonal relationship ability between TGT and jigsaw method (p = 0,263). Conclusions: TGT more effective than jigsaw to increase student learning achievement in biochemical. Those method has not different for student interpersonal relationship ability, because the student has been in good criteria for interpersonal relationship ability. Further implementation could be broad, other object in nursing could be the target, difficult subject would be underlined.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
拼图与团队游戏比赛学习方法对护理新生学业成就及人际关系技能的效果比较
简介:每学期学生取得的生化测评成绩平均分在50分以下。合作学习方法拼图和团队游戏比赛(TGT)是另一种可以提高学生学习效果的学习方法。本研究的目的是了解拼图学习方法在人际关系技能和成就方面的应用效果。方法:本研究采用预实验设计,采用前测后测比较组设计。目标人群为泗水两所护理机构的护生。总样本量为208例。自变量为拼图和TGT,因变量为人际关系技能和成就。研究工具为人际关系技能问卷和客观测验。数据分析采用配对t检验,α≤0.05,进行先验正态性检验。结果:大多数被调查者为19岁,单身,女性,与父母同住。TGT法与拼图法在学生成绩上有差异(p = 0.005), TGT法的平均排名为97、89,拼图法的平均排名为76、52。TGT与拼图法的人际关系能力差异无统计学意义(p = 0.263)。结论:TGT比拼图更能提高学生生化学习成绩。这些方法对学生的人际关系能力没有什么不同,因为学生已经处于良好的人际关系能力标准中。进一步的实施可以是广泛的,护理中的其他对象可以作为目标,困难的主题将被强调。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Web-Based Triage Game Application Development as A Disaster Triage Learning Tools During The Covid-19 Pandemic for Nursing Students Correlation between Psychological Distress and Coping Mechanism Strategy among Health Workers with Confirmed COVID-19 The Effect of Discovery Learning Method on Students’ Self-Motivation Through Online Learning During The Covid-19 Pandemic Effect of Positive Self-Talk on Anxiety Among Patients with Covid-19 The Relationship between the Degree of Stressors and the Coping Strategies of Older Adult Living in Nursing Home
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1