Funding Allocations and Human Resources: Identifying Opportunity Gaps for English Language Learners in “Low-Achieving” and “High-Achieving” Districts in California

M. Olivares
{"title":"Funding Allocations and Human Resources: Identifying Opportunity Gaps for English Language Learners in “Low-Achieving” and “High-Achieving” Districts in California","authors":"M. Olivares","doi":"10.3138/jehr-2021-0060","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"English language learners (ELs) often attend schools where there are (1) inequitable access to appropriately trained teachers and limited professional development opportunities, (2) inadequate instructional time, and (3) inequitable access to instructional materials and curriculum. These conditions place ELs at a considerable disadvantage. Research aimed at analyzing budget accountability plans can help us gain a better understanding of EL-specific allocations that are most associated with student achievement. This qualitative research analyzed six California districts’ locally controlled budget plans to determine differences in funding allocations and targeted personnel funding for English language learners. Budget analysis revealed that all six districts dedicated the largest portion of their budgets to teachers and staff. Different allocation trends were seen between high- and low-achieving districts; but overall, districts did not have a major focus on the academic and personnel needs of ELs and their college and career readiness. Four districts dedicated at least some funding to ELs (0.09–2% of total budget), but there is a lack of targeted hiring for the quality staffing needs of ELs. Without access to appropriate resources and personnel, ELs cannot be expected to have the same opportunities as their non-EL peers.","PeriodicalId":269791,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Education Human Resources","volume":"7 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Education Human Resources","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3138/jehr-2021-0060","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

English language learners (ELs) often attend schools where there are (1) inequitable access to appropriately trained teachers and limited professional development opportunities, (2) inadequate instructional time, and (3) inequitable access to instructional materials and curriculum. These conditions place ELs at a considerable disadvantage. Research aimed at analyzing budget accountability plans can help us gain a better understanding of EL-specific allocations that are most associated with student achievement. This qualitative research analyzed six California districts’ locally controlled budget plans to determine differences in funding allocations and targeted personnel funding for English language learners. Budget analysis revealed that all six districts dedicated the largest portion of their budgets to teachers and staff. Different allocation trends were seen between high- and low-achieving districts; but overall, districts did not have a major focus on the academic and personnel needs of ELs and their college and career readiness. Four districts dedicated at least some funding to ELs (0.09–2% of total budget), but there is a lack of targeted hiring for the quality staffing needs of ELs. Without access to appropriate resources and personnel, ELs cannot be expected to have the same opportunities as their non-EL peers.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
资金分配和人力资源:识别加利福尼亚“低成就”和“高成就”地区英语学习者的机会差距
英语学习者所就读的学校通常存在以下情况:(1)获得受过适当培训的教师的机会不公平,专业发展机会有限;(2)教学时间不足;(3)获得教学材料和课程的机会不公平。这些情况使ELs处于相当不利的地位。旨在分析预算问责制计划的研究可以帮助我们更好地了解与学生成绩最相关的el特定拨款。这项定性研究分析了加州六个地区的地方控制预算计划,以确定资金分配和针对英语学习者的人员资助的差异。预算分析显示,所有六个地区都将预算的大部分用于教师和员工。高、低成绩地区的分配趋势不同;但总的来说,各学区并没有把重点放在学习助理的学术和人才需求以及他们的大学和职业准备上。4个地区至少为教育助理提供了一些资金(占总预算的0.09-2%),但缺乏针对教育助理高质量人员需求的有针对性的招聘。如果不能获得适当的资源和人员,就不能指望高收入者与非高收入者有同样的机会。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
A Phenomenological Study on How University Employees Experienced Working From Home During a Pandemic A Phenomenological Study on How University Employees Experienced Working From Home During a Pandemic Community College Human Resource Issues in the Rural Context Diversifying the Teaching Profession Development and Preliminary Validation of Administrative Support Using House’s Theoretical Framework
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1