A Phenomenological Study on How University Employees Experienced Working From Home During a Pandemic

Amy Hill
{"title":"A Phenomenological Study on How University Employees Experienced Working From Home During a Pandemic","authors":"Amy Hill","doi":"10.3138/jehr-2022-0039","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The purpose of this qualitative study was to explore how employees at a midsized public university in the U.S. South experienced working from home during the coronavirus pandemic of 2020–2021. Most employees in higher education settings were affected by the pandemic. Administrative and clerical and support staff had to determine how to provide the university with services while working from home. Now that we have experienced working from home, will that experience change the future of how staff work in higher education? For many, this was a first-time experience working from home, and it created a new set of challenges to completing everyday work tasks. Most participants found that working from home did not increase their overall productivity or job satisfaction, and few participants felt lonely or isolated when working from home. Overall, the negative aspects and benefits seemed to balance out in a series of trade-offs. The majority of participants would want to work from home again or at least be given the option to work from home part-time or on a hybrid schedule. Recommendations for further research include (a) developing scales of productivity and employee satisfaction among at-home employees, (2) interviewing the same participants from this study who were still working from home in the future to determine if their feelings about the experience changed, (c) asking more in-depth questions on the supervisors’ style during the work-from-home experience, (d) pursuing questions on worker engagement.","PeriodicalId":269791,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Education Human Resources","volume":"37 1-2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Education Human Resources","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3138/jehr-2022-0039","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The purpose of this qualitative study was to explore how employees at a midsized public university in the U.S. South experienced working from home during the coronavirus pandemic of 2020–2021. Most employees in higher education settings were affected by the pandemic. Administrative and clerical and support staff had to determine how to provide the university with services while working from home. Now that we have experienced working from home, will that experience change the future of how staff work in higher education? For many, this was a first-time experience working from home, and it created a new set of challenges to completing everyday work tasks. Most participants found that working from home did not increase their overall productivity or job satisfaction, and few participants felt lonely or isolated when working from home. Overall, the negative aspects and benefits seemed to balance out in a series of trade-offs. The majority of participants would want to work from home again or at least be given the option to work from home part-time or on a hybrid schedule. Recommendations for further research include (a) developing scales of productivity and employee satisfaction among at-home employees, (2) interviewing the same participants from this study who were still working from home in the future to determine if their feelings about the experience changed, (c) asking more in-depth questions on the supervisors’ style during the work-from-home experience, (d) pursuing questions on worker engagement.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
关于大学员工如何体验大流行病期间在家工作的现象学研究
本定性研究旨在探讨美国南部一所中型公立大学的员工在 2020-2021 年冠状病毒大流行期间在家工作的经历。大多数高等教育机构的员工都受到了大流行病的影响。行政、文秘和支持人员必须确定如何在在家工作的同时为大学提供服务。既然我们已经体验过在家工作,那么这种体验是否会改变高等教育机构员工的未来工作方式?对许多人来说,这是第一次在家工作,这给完成日常工作任务带来了一系列新的挑战。大多数参与者发现,在家工作并没有提高他们的整体工作效率或工作满意度,很少有人在家工作时感到孤独或孤立。总的来说,在一系列的权衡中,负面影响和好处似乎达到了平衡。大多数参与者都希望再次在家工作,或者至少可以选择兼职在家工作或混合时间安排在家工作。对进一步研究的建议包括:(a)制定在家工作员工的生产率和员工满意度量表;(2)采访本研究中的同一批参与者,如果他们今后仍在家工作,以确定他们对在家工作经历的感受是否发生了变化;(c)就在家工作经历中主管的风格提出更深入的问题;(d)继续就员工参与度提出问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
A Phenomenological Study on How University Employees Experienced Working From Home During a Pandemic A Phenomenological Study on How University Employees Experienced Working From Home During a Pandemic Community College Human Resource Issues in the Rural Context Diversifying the Teaching Profession Development and Preliminary Validation of Administrative Support Using House’s Theoretical Framework
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1