Copyright Law Protection Competence in Paying Royalty as Exclusive Rights Substance

E. Israhadi
{"title":"Copyright Law Protection Competence in Paying Royalty as Exclusive Rights Substance","authors":"E. Israhadi","doi":"10.14505/jarle.v11.3(49).20","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Copyright is considered as a moving and intangible object; therefore, a copyright devolution cannot be done verbally but must be with an authentic deed or Underhand deed. Problem Identification: 1. How does the song copyright devolution mechanism make economic interest for a composer or Copyright Holder? 2. What is the system of song copyright royalty payment in Indonesia? and 3. What should be done by the parties to resolve the royalty payment execution dispute? It is a normative juridical method that must be used. Research Result: It is true that copyright license mechanism, fee retaining or royalty payment is considered as logic consequences that must be done by a licensee over a licenser (Copyright holder). It is because the licensee gets material profits due to the economic rights exploitation over the copyright itself.  There are many varieties or different ways of compensation payment system or indemnification from the licensee to the licenser over one copyright object to another, for instance in song/music is known two different ways such as royalty and flat systems, while in music or song is known several ways, namely by percentage system, period system, profit sharing system,  compensation or  copyright selling system. Royalty payment dispute resolving may come in many ways, and, generally, the dispute resolving forums are available into two forms, such as litigation forum through courts and non-litigation forum out of court.","PeriodicalId":163930,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Advanced Research in Law and Economics","volume":"88 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-06-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Advanced Research in Law and Economics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14505/jarle.v11.3(49).20","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Copyright is considered as a moving and intangible object; therefore, a copyright devolution cannot be done verbally but must be with an authentic deed or Underhand deed. Problem Identification: 1. How does the song copyright devolution mechanism make economic interest for a composer or Copyright Holder? 2. What is the system of song copyright royalty payment in Indonesia? and 3. What should be done by the parties to resolve the royalty payment execution dispute? It is a normative juridical method that must be used. Research Result: It is true that copyright license mechanism, fee retaining or royalty payment is considered as logic consequences that must be done by a licensee over a licenser (Copyright holder). It is because the licensee gets material profits due to the economic rights exploitation over the copyright itself.  There are many varieties or different ways of compensation payment system or indemnification from the licensee to the licenser over one copyright object to another, for instance in song/music is known two different ways such as royalty and flat systems, while in music or song is known several ways, namely by percentage system, period system, profit sharing system,  compensation or  copyright selling system. Royalty payment dispute resolving may come in many ways, and, generally, the dispute resolving forums are available into two forms, such as litigation forum through courts and non-litigation forum out of court.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
版权法对支付特许权使用费作为专有权实质的保护能力
版权被认为是一种移动的无形物体;因此,版权转让不能口头进行,而必须有真实的契据或暗中契据。问题识别:歌曲版权下放机制如何为作曲家或版权持有人带来经济利益?2. 印尼的歌曲版税支付制度是怎样的?和3。如何解决特许权使用费执行纠纷?这是一种必须使用的规范性司法方法。研究结果:确实,版权许可机制、费用保留或版税支付被认为是被许可方对许可方(版权所有者)必须完成的逻辑后果。这是因为被许可方通过对版权本身的经济权利利用而获得了物质利益。从被许可人到许可人就一个版权对象对另一个版权对象的补偿支付制度或赔偿有许多品种或不同的方式,例如在歌曲/音乐中有两种不同的方式,如版税和扁平制度,而在音乐或歌曲中有几种方式,即百分比制度,期限制度,利润分成制度,补偿或版权出售制度。版税纠纷的解决方式有很多种,一般来说,纠纷解决的途径有两种,即通过法院的诉讼途径和庭外的非诉讼途径。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Using e-Services in Slovak Criminal Proceedings Obligation to Prove Appearer Document Authenticity as Deelneming Claim Exception Entrepreneurship Development Trends in Perm and Sverdlovsk Region Prospective Directions of e-Commerce Development The Range of Applying the Foreign Law in the Jordanian Judiciary Against the Civil Proceedings Caused Due to a Crime
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1