Assessing Perceived Sentiment in Pull Requests with Emoji: Evidence from Tools and Developer Eye Movements

Kang-il Park, Bonita Sharif
{"title":"Assessing Perceived Sentiment in Pull Requests with Emoji: Evidence from Tools and Developer Eye Movements","authors":"Kang-il Park, Bonita Sharif","doi":"10.1109/SEmotion52567.2021.00009","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The paper presents an eye tracking pilot study on understanding how developers read and assess sentiment in twenty-four GitHub pull requests containing emoji randomly selected from five different open source applications. Gaze data was collected on various elements of the pull request page in Google Chrome while the developers were tasked with determining perceived sentiment. The developer perceived sentiment was compared with sentiment output from five state-of-the-art sentiment analysis tools. SentiStrength-SE had the highest performance, with 55.56% of its predictions being agreed upon by study participants. On the other hand, Stanford CoreNLP fared the worst, with only 5.56% of its predictions matching that of the participants’. Gaze data shows the top three areas that developers looked at the most were the comment body, added lines of code, and username (the person writing the comment). The results also show high attention given to emoji in the pull request comment body compared to the rest of the comment text. These results can help provide additional guidelines on the pull request review process.","PeriodicalId":432937,"journal":{"name":"2021 IEEE/ACM Sixth International Workshop on Emotion Awareness in Software Engineering (SEmotion)","volume":"72 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2021 IEEE/ACM Sixth International Workshop on Emotion Awareness in Software Engineering (SEmotion)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/SEmotion52567.2021.00009","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

The paper presents an eye tracking pilot study on understanding how developers read and assess sentiment in twenty-four GitHub pull requests containing emoji randomly selected from five different open source applications. Gaze data was collected on various elements of the pull request page in Google Chrome while the developers were tasked with determining perceived sentiment. The developer perceived sentiment was compared with sentiment output from five state-of-the-art sentiment analysis tools. SentiStrength-SE had the highest performance, with 55.56% of its predictions being agreed upon by study participants. On the other hand, Stanford CoreNLP fared the worst, with only 5.56% of its predictions matching that of the participants’. Gaze data shows the top three areas that developers looked at the most were the comment body, added lines of code, and username (the person writing the comment). The results also show high attention given to emoji in the pull request comment body compared to the rest of the comment text. These results can help provide additional guidelines on the pull request review process.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
用表情符号评估拉请求中的感知情绪:来自工具和开发者眼球运动的证据
本文介绍了一项眼动追踪试点研究,旨在了解开发人员如何阅读和评估24个GitHub拉取请求中的情绪,这些请求包含从五个不同的开源应用程序中随机选择的表情符号。凝视数据是在Google Chrome浏览器的拉取请求页面的各种元素上收集的,而开发人员的任务是确定感知情绪。开发者感知的情绪与五个最先进的情绪分析工具的情绪输出进行了比较。SentiStrength-SE具有最高的性能,其预测的55.56%得到了研究参与者的同意。另一方面,斯坦福大学的CoreNLP表现最差,只有5.56%的预测与参与者的预测相符。Gaze数据显示,开发人员最关注的三个方面是评论主体、添加的代码行和用户名(撰写评论的人)。结果还显示,与其他评论文本相比,拉取请求评论正文中的表情符号受到的关注程度更高。这些结果有助于为拉取请求审查过程提供额外的指导方针。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Program Committee Members Analyzing Emotions in Conceptual Models Verification Tasks performed in Online Contests How Developers and Tools Categorize Sentiment in Stack Overflow Questions - A Pilot Study Emotions in Computer Vision Service Q&A Assessing Perceived Sentiment in Pull Requests with Emoji: Evidence from Tools and Developer Eye Movements
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1