{"title":"Our Study of Comparison of Oticon Digisonic and Cochlear Limited Implants in North India","authors":"R. Mehrotra","doi":"10.33552/ojor.2020.02.000548","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: This study is a comparitive study between oticon Digisonic and Cochlear limited implants outcomes in 200 implant surgeries at late Dr S N Mehrotra charitable ENT foundation between 2016 to 2019. Material and methods: 100 children of Digisonic and 100 of Cochlear Ltd who were implanted between 2016-2019 in Mehrotra ENT hospital, were included in the study. Outcomes of all the implanted children in both groups were analyzed. Scoring system for auditory performance, speech rehabilitation and quality of life were also taken into account for every child implanted. Results of both groups were compared. Results: Highest CAP level attained in cochlear group was 10 whereas in Digisonic group 5. 23% in Cochlear group had CAP level of 5 and above compared to only 1% in Digisonic group. 88% of children in Cochlear group had highest SIR of 5 and 6 compared to 75% in Digisonic group. 87% of cochlear group had GCBI index greater than 80(maximum benefit) compared to 41% of Digisonic group. Only 1% belongs to mild benefit in Cochlear group whereas in Digisonic 29% in minimal benefit group. Conclusion: Cochlear LTD group results were better when compared to Digisonic group in terms of hearing, speech and quality of life index. Digisonic implants had easier insertion. Cochlear proved to be better than Digisonic owing to superior hearing, speech and quality of life outcomes.","PeriodicalId":365490,"journal":{"name":"Online Journal of Otolaryngology and Rhinology","volume":"2 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-07-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Online Journal of Otolaryngology and Rhinology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.33552/ojor.2020.02.000548","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Introduction: This study is a comparitive study between oticon Digisonic and Cochlear limited implants outcomes in 200 implant surgeries at late Dr S N Mehrotra charitable ENT foundation between 2016 to 2019. Material and methods: 100 children of Digisonic and 100 of Cochlear Ltd who were implanted between 2016-2019 in Mehrotra ENT hospital, were included in the study. Outcomes of all the implanted children in both groups were analyzed. Scoring system for auditory performance, speech rehabilitation and quality of life were also taken into account for every child implanted. Results of both groups were compared. Results: Highest CAP level attained in cochlear group was 10 whereas in Digisonic group 5. 23% in Cochlear group had CAP level of 5 and above compared to only 1% in Digisonic group. 88% of children in Cochlear group had highest SIR of 5 and 6 compared to 75% in Digisonic group. 87% of cochlear group had GCBI index greater than 80(maximum benefit) compared to 41% of Digisonic group. Only 1% belongs to mild benefit in Cochlear group whereas in Digisonic 29% in minimal benefit group. Conclusion: Cochlear LTD group results were better when compared to Digisonic group in terms of hearing, speech and quality of life index. Digisonic implants had easier insertion. Cochlear proved to be better than Digisonic owing to superior hearing, speech and quality of life outcomes.
本研究是对2016年至2019年Dr S N Mehrotra慈善耳鼻喉科基金会200例人工耳蜗植入手术中Digisonic耳蜗与Cochlear有限耳蜗植入结果的比较研究。材料与方法:选取2016-2019年在Mehrotra ENT医院植入Digisonic和Cochlear Ltd的100名儿童作为研究对象。对两组患儿全部植入后的结果进行分析。每个植入儿童的听觉表现、语言康复和生活质量评分系统也被考虑在内。比较两组结果。结果:人工耳蜗组CAP水平最高,为10,而双音组CAP水平最高,为5。耳蜗组23%的患者CAP水平在5级及以上,而Digisonic组仅有1%。耳蜗组患儿SIR最高为5、6分的占88%,而Digisonic组患儿SIR最高为75%。耳蜗组有87%的患者GCBI指数大于80(最大效益),而Digisonic组有41%。在人工耳蜗组中只有1%属于轻度获益,而在Digisonic组中只有29%属于轻度获益。结论:与Digisonic组相比,Cochlear LTD组在听力、言语及生活质量指标上均优于Digisonic组。双超声植入物更容易植入。人工耳蜗在听力、语言和生活质量方面优于Digisonic。