The Effect of Retirement Incentives on Retirement Behavior: Evidence from the Self-Employed in the United States and England

Julie M. Zissimopoulos, Nicole Maestas, Lynn A. Karoly
{"title":"The Effect of Retirement Incentives on Retirement Behavior: Evidence from the Self-Employed in the United States and England","authors":"Julie M. Zissimopoulos, Nicole Maestas, Lynn A. Karoly","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.1022430","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The authors examine how public and private pension and health insurance systems affect retirement transitions. In many countries, public and private pension eligibility, as well as access to health insurance varies between self-employed and wage and salary workers, and these differences are likely to cause differential retirement patterns both within and across countries. They use the variation in these institutional features within and across the United States and England to analyze retirement patterns. Based on longitudinal data from the Health and Retirement Study (HRS) in the United States and the English Longitudinal Survey of Ageing (ELSA) they find that the higher labor force exit rate of wage and salary workers compared to self-employed workers is due to defined benefit pension incentives created by the public and private pension systems. Higher rates of labor force exit at ages 55 and older in England compared to the United States are due in part to the availability of publicly provided health insurance.","PeriodicalId":340671,"journal":{"name":"RAND Corporation Law","volume":"304 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2007-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"24","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"RAND Corporation Law","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1022430","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 24

Abstract

The authors examine how public and private pension and health insurance systems affect retirement transitions. In many countries, public and private pension eligibility, as well as access to health insurance varies between self-employed and wage and salary workers, and these differences are likely to cause differential retirement patterns both within and across countries. They use the variation in these institutional features within and across the United States and England to analyze retirement patterns. Based on longitudinal data from the Health and Retirement Study (HRS) in the United States and the English Longitudinal Survey of Ageing (ELSA) they find that the higher labor force exit rate of wage and salary workers compared to self-employed workers is due to defined benefit pension incentives created by the public and private pension systems. Higher rates of labor force exit at ages 55 and older in England compared to the United States are due in part to the availability of publicly provided health insurance.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
退休激励对退休行为的影响:来自美国和英国个体经营者的证据
作者研究了公共和私人养老金和医疗保险制度如何影响退休过渡。在许多国家,公共和私人养恤金资格以及获得医疗保险的机会在自营职业者和工资和薪金工人之间有所不同,这些差异可能导致国家内部和国家之间的不同退休模式。他们利用这些制度特征在美国和英国内部和之间的差异来分析退休模式。基于美国健康与退休研究(HRS)和英国老龄化纵向调查(ELSA)的纵向数据,他们发现,与个体经营者相比,工资和薪水工人的劳动力退出率更高是由于公共和私人养老金制度创造的固定收益养老金激励。与美国相比,英国55岁及以上的劳动力退出率更高,部分原因是公共提供的医疗保险的可用性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The Labor Supply Consequences of the Opioid Crisis Who Gets Counted as Part of America’s STEM Workforce? The Implications of Different Classification Approaches for Understanding the Gender Gap in STEM Re-Evaluating the Returns to Language Skills Using Latent Trait Estimates Lessons Learned from Stabilization Initiatives in Afghanistan: A Systematic Review of Existing Research Characterization of Fertility Levels in Brazil, 1970-2010
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1