Characterization of Fertility Levels in Brazil, 1970-2010

Ernesto F. L. Amaral, Mariana Eugenio Almeida, Guilherme Quaresma Gonçalves
{"title":"Characterization of Fertility Levels in Brazil, 1970-2010","authors":"Ernesto F. L. Amaral, Mariana Eugenio Almeida, Guilherme Quaresma Gonçalves","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.2798918","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"We analyze the 1970, 1980, 1991, 2000, and 2010 Brazilian Demographic Censuses, in order to investigate the associated factors with a woman having had a live birth during the year prior to each census. We estimated logistic regression models for women aged 10-49 years. As independent variables, we selected region of residence, rural/urban location, presence of electricity, color/race, religion, marital status, labor market participation, time of residence in the municipality, information about whether they had a stillbirth, age, education, and parity. Our findings confirm that the probability a woman had a child is higher in the North and Northeast regions, as well as in households without electricity. Women that have a greater chance of having had a child are black/brown, Catholic, married, non-labor market participants, short-term migrants, experienced a stillbirth, between 20-29 years of age, have less education, and have higher parity. Patterns have been changing throughout time, thus posing questions for further analyses.","PeriodicalId":340671,"journal":{"name":"RAND Corporation Law","volume":"12 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-04-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"RAND Corporation Law","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2798918","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

We analyze the 1970, 1980, 1991, 2000, and 2010 Brazilian Demographic Censuses, in order to investigate the associated factors with a woman having had a live birth during the year prior to each census. We estimated logistic regression models for women aged 10-49 years. As independent variables, we selected region of residence, rural/urban location, presence of electricity, color/race, religion, marital status, labor market participation, time of residence in the municipality, information about whether they had a stillbirth, age, education, and parity. Our findings confirm that the probability a woman had a child is higher in the North and Northeast regions, as well as in households without electricity. Women that have a greater chance of having had a child are black/brown, Catholic, married, non-labor market participants, short-term migrants, experienced a stillbirth, between 20-29 years of age, have less education, and have higher parity. Patterns have been changing throughout time, thus posing questions for further analyses.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
1970-2010年巴西生育水平特征
我们分析了1970年、1980年、1991年、2000年和2010年的巴西人口普查,以调查在每次人口普查前一年女性活产的相关因素。我们估计了10-49岁女性的logistic回归模型。作为自变量,我们选择了居住地区、农村/城市位置、电力供应、肤色/种族、宗教、婚姻状况、劳动力市场参与、在市政当局居住的时间、是否有死胎、年龄、教育程度和胎次等信息。我们的研究结果证实,在北部和东北部地区,以及在没有电的家庭,女性生育孩子的可能性更高。有更大机会生育孩子的女性是黑人/棕色人种、天主教徒、已婚、非劳动力市场参与者、短期移民、经历过死产、年龄在20-29岁之间、受教育程度较低、性别平等程度较高。随着时间的推移,模式一直在变化,因此提出了进一步分析的问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The Labor Supply Consequences of the Opioid Crisis Who Gets Counted as Part of America’s STEM Workforce? The Implications of Different Classification Approaches for Understanding the Gender Gap in STEM Re-Evaluating the Returns to Language Skills Using Latent Trait Estimates Lessons Learned from Stabilization Initiatives in Afghanistan: A Systematic Review of Existing Research Characterization of Fertility Levels in Brazil, 1970-2010
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1